View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Weed-free plots had the highest gross return of Rs.133878/ha.
Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Weed free recorded the highest gross return (Rs.133878/ha) and net return (Rs.57311/ha) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1330 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Bouncer 10WP at 150g ha -1 gave the highest gross return and gross margin.
Bouncer 10WP @ 150g ha -1 e0 gross return and gross margin e0 other weed control treatments e0 Verbatim
e0 “application of Bouncer 10WP @ 150g ha -1 gave highest gross return and gross margin than other weed control treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1270 e1 “rice cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–342 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Weedy check produced the lowest gross return , net return and benefit-cost ratio.
gross return, net return and B:C ratio e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the lowest gross return , net return and B:C ratio were received under weedy check ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1626–1707 t0 “lentil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–80 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Hand weeding gave the highest gross return , net return and benefit-to-cost ratio.
gross return, net return, and benefit-to-cost ratio e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Indian mustard (Brassica juncea ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–32 e1 “hand weeding demonstrated the highest gross return , net return , and benefit-to-cost ratio ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1710–1799 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
W5 gave the maximum gross return .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the maximum gross return was obtained in W5 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1073 t0 “aromatic rice ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 76–89 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Weed seed return across the barley cultivars ranged from 10 to 83% of gross yield.
weed seed return e0 10 to 83% of gross yield e0 Verbatim
e0 “weed seed return ranged from 10 to 83% of gross yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1006 t0 “barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–24 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
cost of cultivation and higher gross return
cost of cultivation and higher gross return e0 Verbatim
e0 “hand weeding and IWM involving penoxsulam + butachloar fb mechanical weeding recorded higher cost of cultivation and higher gross return ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1535–1671 t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–85 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
75% RDF with Azotobacter and PSB gave higher gross return , net return and BC ratio.
75% RDF+ Azotobacter + PSB e0 PSB e0 symbiont gross return, net return and BC ratio e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Higher values of gross return , net return and BC ratio were found with the combination of 75% RDF+ Azotobacter + PSB (F1B3). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–1072 e1 “linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–303 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Two hand weedings produced significantly greater gross return , net return , and benefit to cost ratio.
two hand weeding e0 gross return, net return and B:C ratio e0 other herbicide treatments e0 Verbatim
e0 “two hand weeding highest significantly in plant height, grain yield, gross return , net return and B:C ratio to other herbicide treatments. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 478–616 t0 “Summer Green Gram (Vigna radiata L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–98 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Pre-emergence butachlor gave gross return of Rs. 167.51thousand/ha.
butachlor as pre-emergence (T7) e0 Rs. 167.51thousand/ha e0 Not reported Comparator Setting
Verbatim
e0 “butachlor as pre-emergence (T7), showed that significantly higher gross return (Rs. 167.51thousand/ha) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–954 t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–54 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Oryza sativa
Lens culinaris
Brassica juncea.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Hordeum vulgare
Azotobacter.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Vigna radiata