View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: maize ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Deficit irrigation significantly reduced chlorophyll a, b and relative water content .
Treatmentdeficit irrigation e0 Outcomechlorophyll a, b and relative water content e0 Comparatornormal irrigation e1 Verbatim
e0 “deficit irrigation caused a significant decrease in grain yield and other agronomic traits, physiological characteristics (chlorophyll a, b and relative water content ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–802 e1 “normal irrigation, 80% of maximum daily crop evapotranspiration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–503 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect Deficit irrigation significantly reduced maize grain yield and agronomic traits. Intervention effect Deficit irrigation significantly reduced leaf area index, crop growth rate and relative growth rate. Intervention effect Water deficit increased leaf rolling percentage. Intervention effect With stronger deficit, SC705 chlorophyll a, b and relative water content fell more than in SC703 and SC704. Observation At severe stress, SC705 leaf rolling reached 60%. Observation SC705 had the highest grain yield, 8.51 t/ha, under normal irrigation. Observation SC705 had the highest biomass, 19.36 t/ha, under normal irrigation. Observation SC705 had minimum grain yield and biomass at 50% ETc. Intervention effect Increasing deficit from normal irrigation to 50% ETc significantly reduced SC705 leaf area index, plant growth rate and relative growth rate. Intervention effect Increasing deficit from normal irrigation to 50% ETc significantly reduced SC705 net photosynthesis rate. Recommendation The authors recommend preventing water deficit at critical maize growth stages. Recommendation The authors advise planting SC705 when enough irrigation water is available. Recommendation The authors consider SC704 suitable for water deficit, especially at 50% ETc. Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought decrease d maize photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, chlorophyll, relative water content , height and yield.
Outcomenet photosynthesis rate, leaf stomatal conductance, chlorophyll (Chl.) a+b, relative water content (RWC), plant height, and grain yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “drought caused a significant decrease in net photosynthesis rate, leaf stomatal conductance, chlorophyll (Chl.) a+b, relative water content (RWC), plant height, and grain yield of Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1123 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect Increasing drought elevated CAT, SOD, APX, REC and proline. Intervention effect Moderate drought increased WUE by 5.8% relative to control. Intervention effect Severe drought increased WUE by 11.7% relative to control. Observation Clay-loam soil produced the maximum grain yield of 491.8 g. Intervention effect SAP under drought enhanced gas exchange, chlorophyll, water content, height and grain yield. Intervention effect SAP under drought decreased REC, proline, CAT, SOD and APX activity. Observation The 80 kg.ha-1 SAP rate gave the highest photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and chlorophyll, and 10 kg.ha-1 gave the lowest. Intervention effect SAP at 40 and 80 kg.ha-1 increased leaf relative water content. Intervention effect SAP at 10 and 20 kg.ha-1 had no significant effect on leaf relative water content versus control. Recommendation The authors recommend 80 kg.ha-1 SAP for drought in sandy and clay-loam soils. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Deficit irrigation decrease d maize leaf chlorophyll, NDVI and relative water content .
Treatmentdefi cient irrigation e0 OutcomeLeaf chlorophyll contents, the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and Leaf relative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Leaf chlorophyll content s, the normalized difference vegetation in dex (NDVI) and Leaf relative water content (RWC) were decrease d by defi cient irrigation ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 515–669 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
CML-593 relative water content fell 18% under drought versus control.
Treatmentdrought stress e1 Outcomerelative water content e0 Comparatorcontrol conditions e0 Verbatim
t0 “Maize (Zea mays L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–73 e0 “Compared with control conditions, CML-593 recorded a 21% decrease in plant height, 18% reduction in relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1035 e1 “genotype CML-593 maintained significantly higher physiological performance under drought stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–911 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Elevated soil water content under heat lowered maize canopy temperature by 1-3°C relative to heat treatment.
TreatmentHW treatment e0 e1 Outcomecanopy temperature e0 e1 ComparatorH treatment e0 e1 Verbatim
e0 “Averagely, the net photosynthetic rate (Pn) was improved by 20% in HW treatment and a 1-3°C decrease in canopy temperature compared with H treatment in two years. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–751 e1 “maize hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–545 Other claims from this paper (11) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf aging and declining chlorophyll and absorbance accompanied a decrease in maize Pn.
Qualifierleaves would age, and the gradual decrease of chlorophyll relative content and Ab e0 Verbatim
e0 “As the growth period progressed, the leaves would age, and the gradual decrease of chlorophyll relative content and Ab led to a gradual decrease in maize Pn. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1670–1827 Other claims from this paper (18) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The improved lines had higher relative water content under drought.
Qualifierunder drought stress e0 Verbatim
e0 “This improvement was related to the enhancement of water -retention ability, as in dicated by higher RWC and the reduction in damage, as shown by the decrease in REL, MDA, and H2O2 under drought stress. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1755–1955 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Elevated soil water content under heat raised maize net photosynthetic rate by 20% relative to heat treatment.
TreatmentHW treatment e0 e1 Outcomenet photosynthetic rate (Pn) e0 e1 ComparatorH treatment e0 e1 Verbatim
e0 “Averagely, the net photosynthetic rate (Pn) was improved by 20% in HW treatment and a 1-3°C decrease in canopy temperature compared with H treatment in two years. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–751 e1 “maize hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–545 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Deficit irrigation significantly reduced leaf area in dex, crop growth rate and relative growth rate.
Treatmentdeficit irrigation e0 Outcomeleaf area index, crop growth rate, relative growth rate e0 Comparatornormal irrigation e1 Verbatim
e0 “deficit irrigation caused a significant decrease in grain yield and other agronomic traits, physiological characteristics (chlorophyll a, b and relative water content ) and growth parameters (leaf area in dex, crop growth rate, relative growth rate) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–882 e1 “normal irrigation, 80% of maximum daily crop evapotranspiration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–503 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect Deficit irrigation significantly reduced maize grain yield and agronomic traits. Intervention effect Deficit irrigation significantly reduced chlorophyll a, b and relative water content. Intervention effect Water deficit increased leaf rolling percentage. Intervention effect With stronger deficit, SC705 chlorophyll a, b and relative water content fell more than in SC703 and SC704. Observation At severe stress, SC705 leaf rolling reached 60%. Observation SC705 had the highest grain yield, 8.51 t/ha, under normal irrigation. Observation SC705 had the highest biomass, 19.36 t/ha, under normal irrigation. Observation SC705 had minimum grain yield and biomass at 50% ETc. Intervention effect Increasing deficit from normal irrigation to 50% ETc significantly reduced SC705 leaf area index, plant growth rate and relative growth rate. Intervention effect Increasing deficit from normal irrigation to 50% ETc significantly reduced SC705 net photosynthesis rate. Recommendation The authors recommend preventing water deficit at critical maize growth stages. Recommendation The authors advise planting SC705 when enough irrigation water is available. Recommendation The authors consider SC704 suitable for water deficit, especially at 50% ETc. Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Mulch and more frequent irrigation tended to decrease leaf diffusive resistance.
TreatmentMulch and increase in irrigation frequency e0 Outcomeleaf diffusive resistance e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Mulch and in crease in irrigation frequency tended to in crease in relative water content and transpiration rate while decrease d leaf diffusive resistance ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–968 t0 “maize (Zea mays L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–97 Other claims from this paper (11) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.