View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: wheat ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Al-gaimi root dry weight did not decrease under mild deficit.
TreatmentMild water deficit e0 Directionneither decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Mild water deficit affected Sindy-2 and Hab-Ahmar, while Al-gaimi was less affected with neither decrease in root dry weight nor change in dry weight . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–913 t0 “wheat cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–87 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Wheat plant height, leaf length and dry weight continued to decrease after rewatering.
Outcomeplant height, leaf length, and dry weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Even after re-watering, plant height, leaf length, and dry weight continuously decrease d. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1089 e1 “wheat until harvesting ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–589 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl caused the greatest decrease in weed dry weight .
TreatmentFenoxaprop-p-ethyl e0 Outcomedry weight production e0 Directionmaximum decrease e0 Comparatorother chemicals e0 Verbatim
e0 “Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl showed the most potent direct effect and caused maximum decrease in little seed canary grass (P. minor ) population and its dry weight production in comparison to other chemicals ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–544 t0 “in wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–119 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
LU-26s had the smallest decrease in plant height, tiller number, and shoot dry weight under drought.
Outcomeplant height, number of tillers and shoot dry weight e0 Directionminimum decrease e0 Qualifierunder drought condition e0 Verbatim
e0 “genotype LU-26s was found to have best performance under drought condition, with minimum decrease in the growth parameters i.e., plant height, number of tillers and shoot dry weight . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–1038 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–35 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Wheat dry weight decrease d significantly as irrigation salinity increased.
Treatmentsalinity of irrigation water e0 Outcomewheat dry weight e0 Verbatim
e0 “Significant decrease in wheat dry weight was observed with increasing salinity of irrigation water ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1013 t0 “WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Weed management treatments decrease d weed density and dry weight .
Treatmentall treatments e0 Outcomeweed density and dry weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a substantial decrease in weed density and dry weight across all treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1105 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–96 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Aboveground dry weight fell 4.4% for each 10 cm decrease below 100 cm.
OutcomeAbove-ground dry weight e0 Qualifierfor each 10 cm reduction in height below 100 cm e0 Verbatim
e0 “Above-ground dry weight was reduced by 4.4% of the mean weight for each 10 cm reduction in height below 100 cm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1143–1253 t0 “spring wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Shoot dry weight of wheat decrease d with each succeeding delay in seeding date.
Treatmentdelay in seeding date e1 Outcomeshoot dry weight e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “a decrease in shoot dry weight of both wheat and rye occurred with each succeeding delay in seeding date ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–948 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Omission of Ca substantially decrease d wheat top dry weight .
Directionsubstantial decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “For the wheat crop, there was substantial decrease in tops dry weight in the absence of Ca, P, and potassium (K) nutrients. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1043 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Omission of P substantially decrease d wheat top dry weight .
Directionsubstantial decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “For the wheat crop, there was substantial decrease in tops dry weight in the absence of Ca, P, and potassium (K) nutrients. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1043 Other claims from this paper (11) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.