View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reanalysis of the earlier study data found no support for the hypothesis of a polyphyletic origin of plant Type I genes.
supporting evidence for this hypothesis e0 reanalyzing the original data e0 Verbatim
t0 “SRF-type MADS-Box Genes in Land Plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–75 e0 “By reanalyzing the original data from that study, we do not find supporting evidence for this hypothesis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1017 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Phylogeny, sequence similarity and structural evidence show no evidence of SRF-derived genes in land plants.
no evidence of SRF-derived genes e0 Verbatim
e0 “using phylogeny, sequence similarity, and structural evidence, we demonstrate that there is no evidence of SRF-derived genes in land plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1029–1168 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Weed seed distribution did not differ between sampling depths.
sampling depths e1 weed seed distribution e1 did not differ e1 Verbatim
t0 “weed flora ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 e1 “weed seed distribution did not differ between sampling depths or fertiliser regimes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1002 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Weed seed distribution did not differ between fertiliser regimes.
fertiliser regimes e1 weed seed distribution e1 did not differ e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “weed flora ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–22 e1 “weed seed distribution did not differ between sampling depths or fertiliser regimes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1002 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
No adverse relationship was observed between carbon content and animal units, under either continuous or rotational grazing.
native high Andean grassland t0 No adverse relationship e4 Verbatim
t0 “native high Andean grassland ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–47 e4 “No adverse relationship was observed between carbon content and animal units, regardless of continuous or rotational grazing system ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–915 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Total ecosystem carbon stock in clear-cut mangrove sites was 149.06 7.56 Mg C ha -1 versus 280.65 16.92 in intact sites, a difference that was not statistically significant.
clear-cut sites e0 total ecosystem carbon stock e0 149.06 7.56 Mg C ha -1 e0 280.65 16.92 Mg C ha -1 e0 Verbatim
t0 “Mangrove Forest ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112 e0 “the total ecosystem carbon stock in clear-cut sites was 149.06 7.56 Mg C ha -1 , compared to 280.65 16.92 Mg C ha -1 in intact sites; however, this difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–1056 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Q. acutissima showed no warming or drought treatment effects.
warming or drought e0 treatment effects e0 no warming or drought treatment effects e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Contrarily, Q. acutissima showed no warming or drought treatment effects ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1213 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Disease resistance phenotypes of the sorghum panel did not cluster strictly by geographic origin.
disease resistance phenotypes e0 did not cluster strictly by geographic origin e0 Verbatim
t0 “sorghum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–117 e0 “disease resistance phenotypes did not cluster strictly by geographic origin ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–575 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Measured differences in water depth were not statistically significant.
Aquatic Vegetation t0 differences in water depth e0 Verbatim
t0 “Aquatic Vegetation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–18 e0 “measured differences in water depth were not statistically significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1318 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The choice of scoring model (linear, non-linear or membership function) had a minimal effect on the final SQI results.
final SQI results e0 scoring model e0 Verbatim
t0 “Miscanthus cultivation enhances soil quality
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–54 e0 “the choice of scoring model had a minimal effect on the final SQI results ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–916 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Quercus acutissima
Sorghum
Miscanthus