View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Stimulate® spraying lessened the decrease in relative water content under water limitation.
relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “relative water content had a less decrease , due to osmotic adjustment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1085 t0 “Eucalyptus urophylla
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–47 t1 “plants sprayed with Stimulate® ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–978 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought caused a decrease in relative water content .
Drought stress e0 relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Drought stress resulted in a sharp decrease of the relative water content and in crease of the membrane permeability and proline content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1095 t0 “Pear Seedling ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress decrease d leaf area and relative water content in mulberry, with a marked decrease only in severe stress.
leaf area and relative water content e2 a marked decrease was observed only in severe stress treatment e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “in 3-month-old mulberry plants at four levels of water stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–148 e2 “Though leaf area and relative water content decrease d, significantly, a marked decrease was observed only in severe stress treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–380 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity decrease s pigment content and relative water content .
Salinity stress e1 photosynthetic pigments contents and relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in the photosynthetic pigments content s and relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–815 e1 “Salinity stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–538 t0 “Carpinus turczaninowii L.
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–55 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
H6 and Gharashani showed a smaller decrease in relative water content under salinity than sensitive genotypes.
H6 and Gharashani e0 relative water content e0 lower decrease e0 sensitive ones (Shirazi and GhezelUzum) e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “H6 and Gharashani that showed lower decrease in water potential, leaf area, leaf growth rate and relative water content under salinity, were selected as tolerant genotypes compared to sensitive ones (Shirazi and GhezelUzum) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–540 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing salinity substantially decrease d root relative water content .
increase in salinity levels e0 root relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The in crease in salinity levels resulted in a substantial decrease in root relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–481 e1 “Walnut ( J. regia L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–21 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative water content decrease d nearly 16 percent during dehydration.
relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in relative water content of nearly 16% during dehydration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–359 t0 “Parkinsonia aculeata
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–102 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress decrease d relative water content .
watering regimes e1 relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “decrease in relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–554 e1 “The cuttings of Populus deltoides L. (clone Kranti) were exposed to four different water ing regimes (100, 75, 50 and 25% of the field capacity) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–382 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit decrease d leaf area in dex and relative water content .
reduced irrigation e1 leaf area index, and relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The plants experienced a decrease in height, leaf area, number of leaves, leaf area in dex, and relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1084 t0 “Passiflora tripartita var. mollissima
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–79 e1 “reduced irrigation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1153 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salt stress decrease d leaf relative water content , specific leaf area, and soluble sugar content .
Reaumuria soongorica seedlings t0 leaf relative water content (LRWC), specific leaf area (SLA), and soluble sugar content in leaves e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in the leaf relative water content (LRWC), specific leaf area (SLA), and soluble sugar content in leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–824 t0 “Reaumuria soongorica seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–91 e1 “by salt stress, which resulted in a decrease in the leaf relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–754 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect Salt stress inhibited seedling growth. Intervention effect Salt stress elevated superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, and catalase activity. Intervention effect Salt stress accumulated superoxide anion, proline, and malondialdehyde. Intervention effect Salt stress accumulated leaf soluble protein. Intervention effect Salt stress increased LCD activity and endogenous hydrogen sulfide content. Intervention effect NaHS reduced superoxide anion, proline, and malondialdehyde under salt stress. Intervention effect NaHS increased antioxidant enzyme activity under salt stress. Intervention effect NaHS increased soluble sugar and soluble protein content under salt stress. Intervention effect Continued exogenous hydrogen sulfide further increased LCD activity and endogenous hydrogen sulfide content. Intervention effect Exogenous hydrogen sulfide alleviated salt inhibition of height and ground diameter growth rates. Intervention effect Exogenous hydrogen sulfide alleviated salt inhibition of leaf relative water content, biomass, and specific leaf area. Method / resource Leaf relative water content, peroxidase, and proline were identified as main indicators of alleviation. Observation The reported optimal exogenous hydrogen sulfide concentration under salt stress was 0.025 mM. Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Eucalyptus urophyllat0_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Pyrus communis
Carpinus turczaninowii
Parkinsonia aculeata
Populus deltoides
Passiflora tripartita var. mollissima