View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in photosynthesis did not have a corresponding decrease in transpiration rate.
Sangiovese Grapevine t0 transpiration rate e0 Verbatim
t0 “Sangiovese Grapevine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–112 e0 “A corresponding reduction in the transpiration rate was not observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–747 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
At lower light, root cooling did not decrease whole-plant photosynthesis .
A of the whole plant e0 did not cause a decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “At lower PPFD, root cooling did not cause a decrease in A of the whole plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1294 t0 “Artemisia tridentata
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–64 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Photosynthesis of grapevine did not decrease much under drought.
did not decrease very much e2 Verbatim
e1 “In both grapevine varieties, early drought decrease d leaf conductance and transpiration under both CATA and CETE conditions and more markedly in +M plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1430 e2 “Photosynthesis did not decrease very much, so the instantaneous water use efficiency (WUE) increased, especially in drought +M plants under CETE conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1587 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Without drought, early-successional species did not show the decrease in net photosynthesis at the warmest site.
not in ES species e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “An under non-drought conditions decrease d in trees grown at the warmest, low-elevation site, in LS but not in ES species ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1596 t0 “Tropical Trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–78 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Three days after the CO2 decrease , net photosynthesis of Ficus benjamina reached the same level as at high CO2.
A decrease in the CO2 concentration from 700 to 350 μmol mol−1 e3 reached the same level e4 Verbatim
e2 “Ficus benjamina L., cultivar Cleo
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 43–76 e3 “A decrease in the CO2 concentration from 700 to 350 μmol mol−1after six days at high CO2 first significantly decrease d the photosynthesis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 810–947 e4 “but three days later it reached the same level as that at high CO2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1015 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
On cloudy days spruce photosynthesis scarcely decrease d with the same water supply.
intensity of photosynthesis e0 practically does not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “On cloudy days, spruce with the same water supply practically does not decrease the intensity of photosynthesis during the whole day ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1300 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Photosynthesis , stomatal conductance and transpiration did not decrease in the se cultivars at EC 10 in El Paso.
net photosynthetic rate (P n ), stomatal conductance ( g S ), and transpiration (E) e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The net photosynthetic rate (P n ), stomatal conductance ( g S ), and transpiration (E) did not decrease in the se two cultivars at EC 10 in El Paso. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1084 t0 “Rose Cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–41 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect Belinda’s Dream under EC 10 showed no or little reduction in shoot growth, flower number, and leaf SPAD readings Intervention effect Climbing Pinkie under EC 10 showed no or little reduction in shoot growth, flower number, and leaf SPAD readings Intervention effect Mrs. Dudley Cross under EC 10 showed no or little reduction in shoot growth, flower number, and leaf SPAD readings Intervention effect Reve d’Or under EC 10 showed no or little reduction in shoot growth, flower number, and leaf SPAD readings Intervention effect Sea Foam under EC 10 showed no or little reduction in shoot growth, flower number, and leaf SPAD readings Intervention effect Cecile Brunner under EC 10 showed greatest reductions in severe visual foliar salt damage, and they had the greatest reductions in shoot growth and flower number Intervention effect Else Poulsen under EC 10 showed greatest reductions in severe visual foliar salt damage, and they had the greatest reductions in shoot growth and flower number Intervention effect Madame Antoine Mari under EC 10 showed lowest in relative shoot dry weight (DW) and flower number Intervention effect Perle d’Or under EC 10 showed lowest in relative shoot dry weight (DW) and flower number Intervention effect Spice under EC 10 showed lowest in relative shoot dry weight (DW) and flower number Intervention effect Souvenir de St. Anne’s under EC 10 showed lowest in relative shoot dry weight (DW) and flower number Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Heat sensitivity in the light adapted state did not decrease .
heat sensitivity e0 light adapted state e0 Verbatim
e0 “the heat sensitivity was not decrease d in light adapted state ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1333 t0 “grapevine leaf photosynthesis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–49 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Protected spruce twigs showed no decrease in photosynthesis or transpiration over four weeks.
prevented from contact with the exhaust emissions e0 photosynthetic or transpiration rates e0 did not show any decrease e0 within four weeks e0 Verbatim
e0 “Twigs from exposed spruce trees, which had been prevented from contact with the exhaust emissions, did not show any decrease of photosynthetic or transpiration rates within four weeks. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–414 Other claims from this paper (2) Mechanism author interpretation original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The twentieth century growth decline indicates no CO2 fertilization effect on photosynthesis .
no CO 2 fertilization effect on photosynthesis e0 unexpected decrease in growth during the 20th century e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The unexpected decrease in growth during the 20th century indicates that the re was no CO 2 fertilization effect on photosynthesis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1470 e1 “tree‐ring data from old‐growth, subalpine forests of western Canada ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–528 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Artemisia tridentata
Vitis
Ficus benjamina
Picea