View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Crop loss was complete when damage occurred at later growth stages.
damage occurs at later growth stages e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Maize and Sorghum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–81 e0 “the loss is complete when damage occurs at later growth stages ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1130 Other claims from this paper (8) Recommendation author interpretation original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Chemical applications may be unnecessary when leafminer damage does not complete ly remove foliage.
leafminer e0 pest applications of chemicals may be unnecessary e0 leafminer damage is less than complete foliage loss e0 Verbatim
e0 “in seasons when leafminer damage is less than complete foliage loss, applications of chemicals may be unnecessary. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–499 t0 “Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–63 Other claims from this paper (2) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Cell damage ranged from greater endoplasmic reticulum and vacuolation under mild symptoms to complete organelle disintegration under severe symptoms.
Grasses and Cereals t0 Ultrastructural effects e0 Verbatim
t0 “Grasses and Cereals ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–47 e0 “Ultrastructural effects ranged from an increase in endoplasmic reticulum and vacuolation of the cytoplasm in the cells of plants with mild symptoms, to the total disintegration of all cell organelles in plants with the severest symptoms. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1345 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Complete storage-tissue removal lowered seed germination rate.
Complete removal e0 germination rate e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Complete removal lowered the germination rate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–377 t0 “Pea (Pisum sativum L.) and Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–106 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
A complete DNA macromolecule was not essential for repair.
a complete DNA macromolecule was not essential e0 Verbatim
e0 “in the process of reparation the presence of a complete DNA macromolecule was not essential. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–978 e1 “meristematic cells ofVicia faba primary roots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–120 Other claims from this paper (1) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Complete removal reduced the number of vegetative nodes in pea by two.
Complete removal e1 number of vegetative nodes e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The number of vegetative nodes in the pea was lowered by two nodes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–810 e1 “Complete removal lowered the germination rate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–377 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
A complete DNA macromolecule was not essential for the repair effect.
presence of a complete DNA macromolecule was not essential e0 Verbatim
e0 “in the process of reparation the presence of a complete DNA macromolecule was not essential. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–978 e1 “meristematic cells ofVicia faba primary roots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–120 Other claims from this paper (1) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Seed dressing did not counteract complete testa removal; naked seeds had about 10% emergence.
without dressing e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “naked seeds, with and without dressing, gave c. 10% emergence. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–990 t0 “groundnut ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–82 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Complete removal raised the number of vegetative nodes in wheat by one.
Complete removal e2 number of vegetative nodes e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “it was raised by one in the wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–852 e1 “The number of vegetative nodes in the pea was lowered by two nodes whereas it was raised by one in the wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–852 e2 “Complete removal lowered the germination rate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–377 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Complete removal doubled time to flower initiation relative to control, delaying it 20 days.
Complete removal e1 time to flower initiation e0 Verbatim
e0 “This treatment doubled the time to flower initiation (20 d later) compared with the control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–614 e1 “Complete removal lowered the germination rate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–377 t0 “Pea (Pisum sativum L.) and Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–106 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Sorghum
Zea mays
Solanum lycopersicum
Lathyrus oleraceus
Triticum aestivum
Vicia faba
Arachis hypogaea