View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Parasitoid (Cotesia melanoscelus) performance did not vary in relation to CO2 environment (ambient versus elevated).
TaxonCotesia melanoscelus e2 TreatmentCO[sub 2] environment e0 OutcomeParasitoid performance e3 Directionnot in relation e0 Verbatim
e0 “not in relation to CO[sub 2] environment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–922 e1 “grown under ambient or elevated CO[sub 2] conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–277 e2 “the parasitoid Cotesia melanoscelus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–186 e3 “Parasitoid performance varied ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–843 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Parasitoid development time was unaffected under high CO2.
Outcomedevelopment time e0 Verbatim
e0 “development time and adult male size were unaffected ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1295 e1 “Larvae feeding on high CO 2 aspen exhibited the largest reduction in performance , relative to larvae feeding on birch, oak, or maple ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–820 t0 “CO 2 ‐mediated changes in tree chemistry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–100 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Adult male parasitoid size was unaffected under high CO2.
Qualifierdevelopment time and adult male size were unaffected e0 Not reported Treatment
Verbatim
e0 “development time and adult male size were unaffected ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1295 t0 “CO 2 ‐mediated changes in tree chemistry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–100 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Other A. rhopalosiphi performance measures showed no further effects.
Outcomeadult longevity, adult body weight and secondary sex ratio e0 DirectionNo further effects e0 Verbatim
e0 “No further effects were observed in other variables evaluating A. rhopalosiphi performance , such as adult longevity, adult body weight and secondary sex ratio ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1015 t0 “wheat and oat cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–36 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
E. plagiator performance did not differ significantly among cultivars or cereal species.
Outcomevariables analysed e0 Directiondid not show significant differences e0 Verbatim
e0 “E. plagiator did not show significant differences in any of the variables analysed, both between cultivars and cereal species ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1157 t0 “wheat and oat cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–36 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The parasitism effect on gypsy moth performance did not differ between CO2 treatments.
Outcomegypsy moth performance e0 Directiondid not differ e0 ComparatorCO 2 treatments e0 Verbatim
e0 “the effect of parasitism on gypsy moth performance did not differ between CO 2 treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1022 t0 “CO 2 ‐mediated changes in tree chemistry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–100 Other claims from this paper (12) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.