View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Spatial variability was below temporal variability and frequently below 1 mm.
Spatial variability e0 Verbatim
e0 “Spatial variability was less than temporal variability , and frequently less than 1 mm ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1319 t0 “crop yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–89 e1 “by corn and soybean phenological phase ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1073 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield gaps of the four legumes showed large spatial and temporal variability across the production zones.
Large spatial and temporal variability e3 Verbatim
e3 “Large spatial and temporal variability was observed in the yield gaps of the four legumes across the production zones ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1683–1800 Other claims from this paper (13) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Temporal precipitation variability was 0.17 to 3.40 mm·day−1.
Median absolute deviation from a reference year e0 0.17 to 3.40 mm·day−1 e0 Verbatim
e0 “Median absolute deviation from a reference year was 0.17 to 3.40 mm·day−1 ( temporal /year-to-year variability ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1232 t0 “crop yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–89 e1 “by corn and soybean phenological phase ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1035–1073 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Organic soybean yield variability was highest, at 48%.
Temporal yield variability e1 Verbatim
e0 “was highest in the ORG system during the soybean (CV = 48%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1735–1794 e1 “Temporal yield variability differed among management systems and rotation phases and was highest in the ORG system during the soybean (CV = 48%) and winter wheat (CV = 33%) phases of the rotation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1845 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
At a nonmanured site, temporal yield stability across dry years was associated with spatial yield difference variability in response to N (r = 0.96).
temporal yield stability across dry years e4 At a nonmanured site e4 Verbatim
e0 “We evaluated two corn ( Zea mays L.) hybrids at two N rates ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 116–175 e4 “At a nonmanured site, spatial yield difference variability in response to N existed with temporal yield stability across dry years ( r = 0.96) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–918 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation reduced spatial and temporal yield variability .
variability both spatially and temporally e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Irrigation improved yield by at least 1000 kg ha-1 in half of the years simulated, and alsoshowed to have less variability both spatially and temporal ly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1067–1219 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–77 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Temporal variability in biomass and LAI was mapped for the study area and individual farms.
Temporal variability in biomass and LAI e0 Verbatim
e0 “Temporal variability in biomass and LAI were mapped for the study area and highlighted for individual farms. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1619 e1 “six crops (wheat, barley, chickpea, lentil, vetch and cumin) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–350 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Organic winter wheat yield variability was highest, at 33%.
yield variability e1 Verbatim
e0 “winter wheat (CV = 33%) phases of the rotation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1799–1845 e1 “Temporal yield variability differed among management systems and rotation phases and was highest in the ORG system during the soybean (CV = 48%) and winter wheat (CV = 33%) phases of the rotation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1845 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Clustering identified stable spatial and temporal yield clusters.
stable, physically meaningful clusters with recognizable spatial and temporal structure e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The clustering procedure successfully identified stable, physically meaningful clusters with recognizable spatial and temporal structure ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1090 e1 “rice fields ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–558 Other claims from this paper (2) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Patterns of winegrape yield variation were temporal ly stable across seasons.
patterns of yield variation e2 temporal stability e2 Verbatim
e0 “Spatial variability in winegrape yield was studied over several vintages ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–72 e2 “temporal stability in the patterns of yield variation was demonstrated ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–725 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Zea mays subsp. mayse1
Glycine max
Triticum aestivum
Oryza sativa
Vitis vinifera