View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought caused a decrease in relative water content .
TreatmentDrought stress e0 Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Drought stress resulted in a sharp decrease of the relative water content and in crease of the membrane permeability and proline content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1095 t0 “Pear Seedling ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The maximum decrease in relative leaf water content and chlorophyll content under salinity was observed in chickpea genotype ICC15868.
Outcomerelative leaf water content and chlorophyll content e0 Verbatim
e0 “Maximum decrease in relative leaf water content and chlorophyll content was observed with ICC15868 and GL26054 among the desi and L552 from the kabuli genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–765 t0 “chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The maximum decrease in relative leaf water content and chlorophyll content under salinity was observed in chickpea genotype GL26054.
Outcomerelative leaf water content and chlorophyll content e0 Verbatim
e0 “Maximum decrease in relative leaf water content and chlorophyll content was observed with ICC15868 and GL26054 among the desi and L552 from the kabuli genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–765 t0 “chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The maximum decrease in relative leaf water content and chlorophyll content under salinity was observed in chickpea genotype L552.
Outcomerelative leaf water content and chlorophyll content e0 Verbatim
e0 “Maximum decrease in relative leaf water content and chlorophyll content was observed with ICC15868 and GL26054 among the desi and L552 from the kabuli genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 605–765 t0 “chickpea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–66 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Shirazi had a greater decrease in water potential and relative water content than Gharashani.
Outcomewater potential and relative water content e0 Directionhigher decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “It also had a higher decrease in water potential and relative water content and a lower in crease in leaf area as compared with Gharashani. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–530 t0 “GRAPE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 e1 “Shirazi showed a higher decrease in shoot and root lengths and fresh weights than Gharashani ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–390 e2 “2-week salinity (25, 50 and 100 mM NaCl) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–172 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought decrease d chlorophyll content and relative water content .
Treatmentdrought condition e0 Outcomechlorophyll content and relative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “chlorophyll content and relative water content (RWC) decrease in the drought condition ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–464 t0 “Durum Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–58 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit decrease d banana leaf relative water content .
Treatmentdecreased in water content e0 Outcomeleaf relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “There was decrease in the leaf relative water content and soluble protein content in plants with decrease d in water content . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1709–1833 t0 “banana cultivars and hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–70 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf rust decrease relative water content in wheat by -11.42.
Interactorleaf rust e0 pathogen Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “BREAD WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–95 e0 “there was -42.92, -23.72, -23.01, and -11.42, % decrease in chlorophyll content , flag leaf area, specific flag leaf area and relative water content in leaf rust (diseased) plot respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–809 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity decrease s pigment content and relative water content .
TreatmentSalinity stress e1 Outcomephotosynthetic pigments contents and relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in the photosynthetic pigments content s and relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–815 e1 “Salinity stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–538 t0 “Carpinus turczaninowii L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–55 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative water content decrease d to a basal level after drought treatments.
Treatmentdrought treatments e0 Outcomerelative water content e0 Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in relative water content to a basal level in response to drought treatments was observed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–821 t0 “SOYBEANS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–56 Other claims from this paper (11) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.