View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Net photosynthesis showed no obvious decrease as temperature rose.
temperature rising e0 net photosynthesis e0 no obvious decrease e0 Verbatim
t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–92 e0 “no obvious decrease pattern in net photosynthesis appeared along with the temperature rising ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–499 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Other native species had no significant decrease in net photosynthesis under water deficit.
caatinga native species t0 net photosynthesis e0 did not suffer significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “caatinga native species ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–40 e0 “The other species can be considered more tolerant to drought, since net photosynthesis did not suffer significant decrease despite the harmful effects of water deficit on transpiration and stomatal conductance. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–1056 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
No lower limit for photosynthesis is evident in the absorption spectra; some experiments down to 300 nm showed no decrease in absorption.
lower limit for photosynthesis e5 Verbatim
e1 “The spectrum of a Fuchsia leaf ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 735–765 e5 “No evidence, however, is to be seen of a lower limit for photosynthesis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1442–1513 e6 “some experiments down to 300 nm still did not show a decrease of the absorption ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1528–1607 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect author interpretation original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Appropriate enhanced UV-B radiation does not decrease photosynthesis of grapevine leaves, which the authors take as strong adaptability.
appropriate enhanced UV-B radiation e5 couldn't decrease e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Leaves of Grapevine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–111 e5 “The grapevine has strong adaptability to UV-B radiation,and appropriate enhanced UV-B radiation couldn't decrease the photosynthesis of grapevine leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1082–1234 Other claims from this paper (11) Association Photosynthetic pigment content in grapevine leaves increased with time under different enhanced UV-B treatments. Intervention effect At 10.8 μW/cm2 UV-B, chlorophyll a increased by 5% relative to control. Intervention effect At 10.8 μW/cm2 UV-B, chlorophyll b increased by 2% relative to control. Intervention effect At 10.8 μW/cm2 UV-B, total chlorophyll increased by 4% relative to control. Intervention effect At 10.8 μW/cm2 UV-B, carotenoid increased by 3% relative to control. Intervention effect At 25.6 μW/cm2 UV-B, chlorophyll a increased by 11% relative to control, a significant increase. Intervention effect At 25.6 μW/cm2 UV-B, chlorophyll b increased by 9% relative to control. Intervention effect At 25.6 μW/cm2 UV-B, total chlorophyll increased by 10% relative to control. Intervention effect At 25.6 μW/cm2 UV-B, carotenoid increased by 7% relative to control. Intervention effect At 10.8 μW/cm2 UV-B, flavonoid content in grapevine leaves increased by 13% relative to control. Intervention effect At 25.6 μW/cm2 UV-B, flavonoid content in grapevine leaves increased by 9% relative to control. Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative stimulation of net photosynthesis under higher CO2 did not decrease at subsaturating light.
increasing the ambient CO2 concentration from 380 to 570 µmol mol-1 e0 relative stimulation of P N e0 did not decrease e0 less than saturating PPFDs e0 Verbatim
e0 “the relative stimulation of P N with increasing the ambient CO2 concentration from 380 to 570 µmol mol-1 did not decrease at less than saturating PPFDs ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1341 t0 “common bean, quinoa, and soybean leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–834 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Photosynthesis , stomatal conductance and transpiration did not decrease in the se cultivars at EC 10 in El Paso.
net photosynthetic rate (P n ), stomatal conductance ( g S ), and transpiration (E) e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The net photosynthetic rate (P n ), stomatal conductance ( g S ), and transpiration (E) did not decrease in the se two cultivars at EC 10 in El Paso. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1084 t0 “Rose Cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–41 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect Belinda’s Dream under EC 10 showed no or little reduction in shoot growth, flower number, and leaf SPAD readings Intervention effect Climbing Pinkie under EC 10 showed no or little reduction in shoot growth, flower number, and leaf SPAD readings Intervention effect Mrs. Dudley Cross under EC 10 showed no or little reduction in shoot growth, flower number, and leaf SPAD readings Intervention effect Reve d’Or under EC 10 showed no or little reduction in shoot growth, flower number, and leaf SPAD readings Intervention effect Sea Foam under EC 10 showed no or little reduction in shoot growth, flower number, and leaf SPAD readings Intervention effect Cecile Brunner under EC 10 showed greatest reductions in severe visual foliar salt damage, and they had the greatest reductions in shoot growth and flower number Intervention effect Else Poulsen under EC 10 showed greatest reductions in severe visual foliar salt damage, and they had the greatest reductions in shoot growth and flower number Intervention effect Madame Antoine Mari under EC 10 showed lowest in relative shoot dry weight (DW) and flower number Intervention effect Perle d’Or under EC 10 showed lowest in relative shoot dry weight (DW) and flower number Intervention effect Spice under EC 10 showed lowest in relative shoot dry weight (DW) and flower number Intervention effect Souvenir de St. Anne’s under EC 10 showed lowest in relative shoot dry weight (DW) and flower number Mechanism author interpretation original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The twentieth century growth decline indicates no CO2 fertilization effect on photosynthesis .
no CO 2 fertilization effect on photosynthesis e0 unexpected decrease in growth during the 20th century e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The unexpected decrease in growth during the 20th century indicates that the re was no CO 2 fertilization effect on photosynthesis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1470 e1 “tree‐ring data from old‐growth, subalpine forests of western Canada ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–528 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Ambient-CO₂ leaf photosynthesis did not differ among genotypes.
Leaf photosynthesis e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Leaf photosynthesis at ambient [CO₂] was not different among the genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–550 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Direct photosynthetic measurements showed no significant decrease under phosphate deprivation.
did not show any significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Direct photosynthetic and respiration measurements did not show any significant decrease under P deprivation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–996 t0 “Lotus japonicus
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–81 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Direct respiration measurements showed no significant decrease under phosphate deprivation.
did not show any significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Direct photosynthetic and respiration measurements did not show any significant decrease under P deprivation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–996 t0 “Lotus japonicus
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–81 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Oryza sativat0
Fuchsia
Vitis
Phaseolus vulgaris
Lotus japonicus