View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Stimulate® spraying lessened the decrease in relative water content under water limitation.
Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “relative water content had a less decrease , due to osmotic adjustment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1085 t0 “Eucalyptus urophylla ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–47 t1 “plants sprayed with Stimulate® ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–978 Other claims from this paper (5) Mechanism author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Osmotic adjustment was presented as the cause of the smaller decrease in relative water content .
Outcomerelative water content e0 Qualifierosmotic adjustment e0 Verbatim
e0 “relative water content had a less decrease , due to osmotic adjustment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1085 t0 “Eucalyptus urophylla ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–47 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
H6 and Gharashani showed a smaller decrease in relative water content under salinity than sensitive genotypes.
MaterialH6 and Gharashani e0 Outcomerelative water content e0 Directionlower decrease e0 Comparatorsensitive ones (Shirazi and GhezelUzum) e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “H6 and Gharashani that showed lower decrease in water potential, leaf area, leaf growth rate and relative water content under salinity, were selected as tolerant genotypes compared to sensitive ones (Shirazi and GhezelUzum) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–540 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Calcium treatment reduced the decrease in relative water content of leaves under osmotic stress.
TaxonHemerocallis middendorfii t0 Treatmentcalcium treatment e2 Outcomerelative water content of leaves e1 Comparatorosmotic stress e1 Verbatim
t0 “Hemerocallis middendorfii under Osmotic Stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–137 e1 “under osmotic stress,the relative water content of leaves decrease d significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–340 e2 “while the decrease reduced after calcium treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–391 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Under water stress, YS-1L had a smaller decrease in leaf relative water content than other wheat species.
TreatmentStress treatment e0 Directionmuch smaller decrease e0 Comparatorother wheat species e0 Verbatim
e0 “Stress treatment caused a much smaller decrease in the leaf RWC and rise in MDA content in YS-1L compared to the other wheat species. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1417 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Paclobutrazol pretreatment mitigated drought decrease s in relative water and chlorophyll content .
TreatmentPre-treatment of paclobutra201 e1 Outcomerelative water content and chlorophyll content e0 Directionmitigated the decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “mitigated the decrease of photosynthetic rate,transpiration rate, relative water content and chlorophyll content under drought stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–731 e1 “Pre-treatment of paclobutra201 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–476 t0 “blueberry ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 63–72 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
ZnSO4 before seven days without water minimized the drought decrease in relative water content (RWC).
MaterialTV-1, TV-17, and TV-29 e0 Treatmentzinc sulfate (ZnSO4) treatment e0 Outcomerelative water content (RWC) e0 Qualifierwater withholding for 7 days e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “drought- in duced decrease in relative water content (RWC), dry mass of leaf, and antioxidants such as ascorbate and glutathione in the tested tea clones (TV-1, TV-17, and TV-29) was minimized by zinc sulfate (ZnSO4) treatment before water withholding for 7 days. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–631 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought significantly decrease d leaf relative water content across cultivars.
Outcomeleaf relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A significant decrease of leaf relative water content was found in tested cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–453 e1 “drought stress was in itiated by withholding water for 14 d ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–338 t0 “yellow lupin ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–55 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought hardening alleviated decrease s in relative water content , net photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll content under drought.
Treatmentdrought hardening e0 Outcomerelative water content (RWC), net photosynthetic rate (Pn) and chlorophyll content e0 Directionalleviated the decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “drought hardening alleviated the decrease in relative water content (RWC), net photosynthetic rate (Pn) and chlorophyll content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 384–511 t0 “potato seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–79 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Genotype BB24 showed a smaller decrease in relative water content with more negative leaf water potential than BB04.
Verbatim
e0 “common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–123 e4 “The genotype BB24 showed a smaller decrease in RWC with more negative LWP than BB04 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1017 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.