View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Defoliation caused a substantial decrease in wheat root density .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Temporary growth cessation of wheat roots following defoliation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–63 e2 “This caused a substantial decrease in root density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–934 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Under low plant density the overall soybean yield may slightly decrease .
Low plant density e3 may slightly decrease e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–60 e3 “Low plant density helps improve in dividual plant growth and nutrient use efficiency, although the overall yield may slightly decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–421 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Management relaxation was associated with a decrease in vegetation density .
management relaxation e1 vegetation density e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “mountain grasslands ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–88 e1 “A higher butterfly abundance and species richness following management relaxation was mostly driven by a decrease in vegetation density and an in crease in forb cover. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1374 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
High humidity did not decrease stomatal density in barley.
stomatal density e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “decrease d stomatal density in tomato, but not in barley. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–849 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect author interpretation original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
Non-GM pure-line high- density short-season varieties could decrease in secticide use in cotton.
Non-GM pure-line high-density short-season varieties e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e3 “Non-GM pure-line high- density short-season varieties could double rainfed cotton yield, reduce costs, decrease in secticide use, and help ameliorate suicides ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2173–2329 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing cucumber density did not decrease weekly yield per area or total yield.
reducing plant density e0 weekly yield per unit area and total yield e0 did not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “reducing plant density did not significantly affect the photosynthesis of leaves and did not decrease weekly yield per unit area and total yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 701–845 t0 “Cucumber ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–76 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Harvest in dex tended to decrease slightly as sowing density in creased.
sowing density e0 differences were very small e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A tendency of a harvest in dex decrease was detected along with an in crease in the sowing density , but the differences were very small ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1464 t0 “White Lupin ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–28 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Wood changes caused by in sect damage led to a decrease in charcoal density .
damaged by defoliating insects e0 defoliating insects e0 pest healthy condition e0 Verbatim
e0 “Eucalyptus grandis × Eucalyptus urophylla (clone A) and Eucalyptus saligna (clone B) trees, both in healthy condition and damaged by defoliating in sects ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 237–389 e1 “and a decrease in density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–985 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
grain weight and grain size of the panicle was decrease in relation to agrocenosis density .
agrocenosis density e0 grain weight and grain size of the panicle e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “An in crease in agrocenosis density caused to decrease in grain weight and grain size of the panicle, but the 1000 grain weight was relatively stable. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–877 t0 “grain sorghum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–52 Other claims from this paper (17) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher density decrease d stem density in the top layer.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in stem density in the top layer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1067 t0 “Abutilon theophrasti
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–82 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivumt0
Glycine max.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Hordeum vulgare
Gossypium hirsutum
Cucumis sativus.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Eucalyptus
Sorghum bicolor
Abutilon theophrasti