View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Nutrient density unit under ORD did not decrease significantly.
Outcomenutrient density unit (NDU) e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “its nutrient density unit (NDU) did not decrease significantly due to the additional duck yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–635 t0 “rice–duck coculture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–112 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
High humidity did not decrease stomatal density in barley.
Outcomestomatal density e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “decrease d stomatal density in tomato, but not in barley. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–849 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil in oculum density did not significantly decrease from 1 to 12 months after in corporation.
Outcomesoil inoculum density e0 Directionnot a significant decrease e0 Comparator1 and 12 months e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Regardless of treatment, there was not a significant decrease in soil in oculum density between 1 and 12 months after residue was in corporated ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–907 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
High soil bulk density did not decrease Avicennia root growth.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “High BD decrease d root growth of R. stylosa , but not A. marina . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–712 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Rhizosphere bacterial network complexity and density did not decrease in three Bt rice lines relative to the non-Bt line.
Treatmentthree Bt rice lines e0 Outcomenetwork complexity and density e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Verbatim
t0 “Bt-transgenic rice plantings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–51 e0 “network complexity and density for the three Bt rice lines did not decrease compared with those for the non-Bt line ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1321 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
More stale seedbed passes did not decrease weed density in lemon balm after sowing.
Treatmentintensification of the stale seedbed e0 Directionno decreasing effect e0 Not reported Interactor role Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “in tensification of the stale seedbed had no decreasing effect on weed density in lemon balm after sowing ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–901 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
December NSC concentration remained high and did not decrease significantly under high forest density .
OutcomeNSC concentration e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “the NSC concentration in December remained at a high level and did not significantly decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1166 t0 “Vitex negundo Var. heterophylla ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–114 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Shoot formation ability did not decrease at the second cut; density was 300-500 pcs/m.
Outcomeshoot formation ability of herbs e0 Directionwas not observed e0 Verbatim
e0 “A decrease in shoot formation ability of herbs during the second mowing was not observed, the density of agrophytocenoses was at the level of 300-500 pcs/m ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1251 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Applying 112 kg N at high sorghum planting density did not decrease the number, height, or biomass of late-emerging Palmer amaranth.
Treatmentapplying 112 kg N e3 InteractorPalmer amaranth e2 weed OutcomePalmer amaranth’s number, height, and biomass e3 Directionno_change inferred e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e2 “Weedy sorghum was in fested with late-emerging Palmer amaranth only ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–665 e3 “applying 112 kg N ha −1 did not improve grain yield or decrease Palmer amaranth’s number, height, and biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–899 e0 “At the high sorghum planting density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–764 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Reduced in tensity under red light did not in fluence stomatal density .
Treatmentdecrease in light intensity e0 Outcomestomatal density (SD) e0 Directiondid not influence e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in light in tensity did not in fluence the stomatal density (SD), specific leaf weight (SLW) or gopmax under red light ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–705 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.