View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The proposed model fits the experimental data well.
Comparatorthe experimental data e4 Verbatim
e4 “We propose a model that fits nicely the experimental data ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–491 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Model fits were best for maize, then wheat and potato.
Comparatorwheat and potato e0 Verbatim
e0 “with the best model fits obtained for maize, followed by wheat and potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–842 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The plant also fits into the classification of polysporangiophytes.
TaxonCapesporangites petrkraftii t0 Outcomefits into the classification of polysporangiophytes e1 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “Capesporangites petrkraftii ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–48 e1 “also fits into the classification of polysporangiophytes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1214 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource author interpretation original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
The revised forest parameterisations provide better fits to the underlying data.
Outcomefits to the underlying data e0 Comparatorunderlying data e0 Verbatim
e0 “propose that these provide better fits to the underlying data ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1300 t0 “forest ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Model fits were similar and critical nitrogen rates varied by less than 7%.
Comparatorcritical N rates e0 Verbatim
e0 “model fits were similar, and critical N rates varied by <7% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1076 t0 “goldrush potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–43 Other claims from this paper (11) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Statistical fits to recognized NVC types were often poor.
Outcomestatistical fits e0 Comparatorrecognised NVC vegetation types e0 Verbatim
e0 “statistical fits to recognised NVC vegetation types were often poor. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–924 t0 “Equisetum variegatum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–48 Other claims from this paper (8) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Average power law fits were proposed for broadleaved trees, conifers, shrubs, grasses and forbs.
Taxonbroadleaved trees, conifers, shrubs, grasses and forbs e5 Outcomeaverage power law fits e5 Verbatim
e5 “Average power law fits were proposed for broadleaved trees, conifers, shrubs, grasses and forbs ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1247–1342 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Quinoa showed the most consistent model fits , with several outcomes at R2 above 0.90.
Qualifierseveral outcomes e2 Verbatim
e2 “with quinoa showing the most consistent fits (several outcomes R2>0.90) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1024 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The woody plant assortment fits soil conditions but only partly fits moisture conditions.
Outcomecorresponds to the soil conditions of the territory e0 Qualifieronly partially to the moisture regime e0 Verbatim
e0 “the available assortment of woody plants in the park corresponds to the soil conditions of the territory, but only partially to the moisture regime ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1645–1792 Other claims from this paper (19) Observation The park contains 438 trees belonging to 32 species. Observation Robinia pseudoacacia represents 25% of park trees.Observation Acer platanoides represents 11.19% of park trees.Observation Acer negundo represents 10.05% of park trees.Observation Aesculus hippocastunum was present in sufficient quantities. Observation Aceraceae had four species. Observation Salicaceae had four species. Observation Ulmaceae had three species. Observation Blooming decorative trees made up 52,25 % of park plants. Observation The park biodiversity index was 11,74, high relative to other regional parks. Observation Introduced species made up 71.65% of park trees. Observation Some park trees grow in rows and Spiraea vanhouttei in hedgerow groups. Observation The most numerous diameter classes were 14,1–18,0, 32,1–38,0, and 38,1–42,0. Observation Average trunk diameter was 27 cm. Observation Trees 8,1 to 12,0 m tall comprised 52.09%. Observation Undamaged trees comprised 51,37%. Observation Moderately weakened trees comprised 35,39%. Observation No dead-standing trees were detected. Observation Park phytocenosis was assigned aesthetic class II. Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The standard-parameter HPM decomposition module fits litterbag-derived Sphagnum decomposition rates.
ComparatorSphagnum litterbag datae0 Verbatim
e0 “The HPM decomposition module with standard parameter values fits k0 estimated from Sphagnum litterbag data ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1706–1812 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.