View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Zea mays ✕
A claim can belong to several research areas, so group counts add up to more than the total.
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salt stress similarly reduced leaf relative water content in both maize cultivars.
leaf relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “salt stress caused a similar decrease in leaf relative water content in both maize cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1089 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought significantly decrease d maize relative water content .
drought condition e0 relative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “drought condition caused a significant decrease in biomass, total chlorophyll, relative water content (RWC) of the plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–983 t0 “Zea mays seedlings
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Osmotic stress decrease d seedling relative water content .
osmotic stress t0 seedling relative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in seedling relative water content (RWC) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1153 t0 “osmotic stress resistance by improving leaf photosynthetic physiology and antioxidant capacity in maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–144 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Longer irrigation cycles decrease d ear leaf area and relative water content .
increasing irrigation cycle e0 ear leaf area and relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “by in creasing irrigation cycle and as a result decreasing water using in four levels of irrigation, traits like forage yield, ear weight, plant height, stem and leaf weight, ear leaf area and relative water content have decrease in treatment according to decrease in water used. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1240 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–64 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Deficit irrigation significantly reduced chlorophyll a, b and relative water content .
deficit irrigation e0 chlorophyll a, b and relative water content e0 normal irrigation e1 Verbatim
e0 “deficit irrigation caused a significant decrease in grain yield and other agronomic traits, physiological characteristics (chlorophyll a, b and relative water content ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 635–802 e1 “normal irrigation, 80% of maximum daily crop evapotranspiration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–503 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–95 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect Deficit irrigation significantly reduced maize grain yield and agronomic traits. Intervention effect Deficit irrigation significantly reduced leaf area index, crop growth rate and relative growth rate. Intervention effect Water deficit increased leaf rolling percentage. Intervention effect With stronger deficit, SC705 chlorophyll a, b and relative water content fell more than in SC703 and SC704. Observation At severe stress, SC705 leaf rolling reached 60%. Observation SC705 had the highest grain yield, 8.51 t/ha, under normal irrigation. Observation SC705 had the highest biomass, 19.36 t/ha, under normal irrigation. Observation SC705 had minimum grain yield and biomass at 50% ETc. Intervention effect Increasing deficit from normal irrigation to 50% ETc significantly reduced SC705 leaf area index, plant growth rate and relative growth rate. Intervention effect Increasing deficit from normal irrigation to 50% ETc significantly reduced SC705 net photosynthesis rate. Recommendation The authors recommend preventing water deficit at critical maize growth stages. Recommendation The authors advise planting SC705 when enough irrigation water is available. Recommendation The authors consider SC704 suitable for water deficit, especially at 50% ETc. Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought decrease d maize photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, chlorophyll, relative water content , height and yield.
net photosynthesis rate, leaf stomatal conductance, chlorophyll (Chl.) a+b, relative water content (RWC), plant height, and grain yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “drought caused a significant decrease in net photosynthesis rate, leaf stomatal conductance, chlorophyll (Chl.) a+b, relative water content (RWC), plant height, and grain yield of Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1123 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect Increasing drought elevated CAT, SOD, APX, REC and proline. Intervention effect Moderate drought increased WUE by 5.8% relative to control. Intervention effect Severe drought increased WUE by 11.7% relative to control. Observation Clay-loam soil produced the maximum grain yield of 491.8 g. Intervention effect SAP under drought enhanced gas exchange, chlorophyll, water content, height and grain yield. Intervention effect SAP under drought decreased REC, proline, CAT, SOD and APX activity. Observation The 80 kg.ha-1 SAP rate gave the highest photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and chlorophyll, and 10 kg.ha-1 gave the lowest. Intervention effect SAP at 40 and 80 kg.ha-1 increased leaf relative water content. Intervention effect SAP at 10 and 20 kg.ha-1 had no significant effect on leaf relative water content versus control. Recommendation The authors recommend 80 kg.ha-1 SAP for drought in sandy and clay-loam soils. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Reducing ZmHSF10 expression in maize (VIGS-silenced) decrease d chlorophyll content , cell membrane stability and relative water content in leaves under high temperature stress.
Reducing the expression level of ZmHSF10 e0 chlorophyll content, poor cell membrane stability, and lower relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Reducing the expression level of ZmHSF10 leads to a decrease in chlorophyll content , poor cell membrane stability, and lower relative water content in maize leaves under high temperature stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1377 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Of the differentially expressed protein spots, 5 were down-regulated in water -deficient maize plants.
V5 or V6 leaf stage e2 withholding water for 10 days e2 decrease inferred e6 well-watered plants e1 Verbatim
e2 “in bred maize (Zea mays L.) line KS140 was subjected to drought stress by withholding water for 10 days at the V5 or V6 leaf stage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–264 e1 “Water -deficient plants experienced a decrease in relative leaf water content , stomatal conductance, net CO2 assimilation rate, and water use efficiency compared to well- water ed plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–449 e6 “Of the 29 differentially expressed proteins, 24 and 5 protein spots were up- and down-regulated in water -deficient plants, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1255 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Twenty-nine protein spots were differentially expressed between well- water ed and water -deficient maize plants.
V5 or V6 leaf stage e2 withholding water for 10 days e2 Differential expression e5 well-watered plants e1 Verbatim
e2 “in bred maize (Zea mays L.) line KS140 was subjected to drought stress by withholding water for 10 days at the V5 or V6 leaf stage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 135–264 e1 “Water -deficient plants experienced a decrease in relative leaf water content , stomatal conductance, net CO2 assimilation rate, and water use efficiency compared to well- water ed plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–449 e5 “Differential expression was observed for 29 protein spots, and these were identified using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–945 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Azotobacter in creased maize yield and leaf traits under normal and deficit irrigation.
grain yield, Leaf Area Index, leaf chlorophyll contents, the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and Leaf relative water content (RWC) e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Use of Azotobacter and vermicompost signifi cantly in creased these traits in normal and defi cit irrigation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–778 e1 “grain yield, Leaf Area In dex, leaf chlorophyll content s, the normalized difference vegetation in dex (NDVI) and Leaf relative water content (RWC) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 485–629 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–99 t1 “Vermicompost and Azotobacter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Zea mays
Zea mays subsp. mays
Azotobacter