View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Other native species had no significant decrease in net photosynthesis under water deficit.
caatinga native species t0 net photosynthesis e0 did not suffer significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “caatinga native species ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–40 e0 “The other species can be considered more tolerant to drought, since net photosynthesis did not suffer significant decrease despite the harmful effects of water deficit on transpiration and stomatal conductance. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 846–1056 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Net photosynthesis decrease d nonsignificantly in asymptomatic leaves of symptomatic plants.
asymptomatic leaves e0 Bois noir t0 pathogen net photosynthesis (Pn) e0 Verbatim
e0 “in the asymptomatic leaves of the symptomatic plants the net photosynthesis (Pn) decrease was not significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1132 t0 “Bois noir on carbon assimilation, transpiration, stomatal conductance of leaves and yield of grapevine ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–113 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Direct photosynthetic measurements showed no significant decrease under phosphate deprivation.
did not show any significant decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Direct photosynthetic and respiration measurements did not show any significant decrease under P deprivation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–996 t0 “Lotus japonicus
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–81 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
IRGA did not significantly decrease net photosynthesis at the tested moisture range.
net photosynthesis e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “did not cause a significant decrease in net photosynthesis within this range ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1478 e1 “The drying effect of the IRGA process ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1136 e2 “Colonies of Bazzania trilobata (L.) S. Gray ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–43 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Heavy water did not significantly decrease the on-line carbon isotope discrimination associated with photosynthesis in Xanthium strumarium .
on-line carbon isotope discrimination (Δ13C, or Δobs) e1 not significantly decreased e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “Using 12C/13C stable isotope techniques and Xanthium strumarium L. leaves, we show that the on-line carbon isotope discrimination (Δ13C, or Δobs) associated with photosynthesis is not significantly decrease d by heavy water ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–658 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The decrease in 100-seed weight was not significant.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The decrease of 100-seed weight of soybean was not significant(P0.05) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–679 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–50 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At high nitrogen, elevated carbon dioxide did not significantly decrease ryegrass carboxylation capacity or proteins.
carboxylation capacity or proteins e0 no significant decreases e0 Not reported Material Gene Compound Organ / stage Interactor Comparator Setting Value Qualifier
Verbatim
e0 “In high N the re were no significant decrease s in carboxylation capacity or proteins ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1192 t0 “Perennial Ryegrass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 130–148 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf nitrogen content decrease d with increasing CO2 concentration, although the decrease was not statistically significant at maturity.
CO 2 concentration e0 Leaf nitrogen content e0 not statistically significant at maturity e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Leaf nitrogen content decrease d with the increase of CO 2 concentration although it was not statistically significant at maturity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1148 t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–94 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Lowering root temperature, except to 5°C, did not significantly decrease the photosynthetic rate of tomato plants during 8 h of daylight.
lowering of root temperature e1 photosynthetic rate e1 did not decreased significantly e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–147 e1 “With lowering of root temperature, except 5°C, the photosynthetic rate did not decrease d significantly during 8 h of daylight, whereas the transpiration rate decrease d significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–572 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Added 27 mM NaCl did not significantly decrease biomass production or harvest photosynthesis parameters relative to Control_2.
addition of 27 mM NaCl e0 biomass production, or in photosynthesis-related parameters at harvest e0 did not result in any significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Compared to Control_2, the addition of 27 mM NaCl in the nutrient solution did not result in any significant decrease in biomass production, or in photosynthesis -related parameters at harvest ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1847–2038 t0 “Lettuce ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–7 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Hypoxia decrease d shoot growth rate and photosynthesis of wheat only insignificantly.
the rate of shoot growth and photosynthesis e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “GROWTH OF WHEAT PLANTS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–68 e4 “the decrease in the rate of shoot growth and photosynthesis under the influence of hypoxia was insignificant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1176 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
No significant decrease in photosynthesis ability of the fourth leaf or chlorophyll content was seen under 12 plants m −2 compared with 7.5 plants m −2.
fourth leave e0 12 plants m −2 e1 photosynthesis ability of the fourth leave and chlorophyll content e0 no significant decrease e1 7.5 plants m −2 e1 Verbatim
e0 “The photosynthesis ability of the fourth leave and chlorophyll content both decrease d with increasing plant density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1612–1727 e1 “but no significant decrease was observed under 12 plants m −2 compared to 7.5 plants m −2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1729–1818 t0 “high density cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–101 Other claims from this paper (15) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Corn transpiration was not detectably changed by the decrease in effective plant conductance and soil conductivity.
decrease in effective plant conductance and soil conductivity e2 not detectably changed e2 Verbatim
e1 “The variation of leaf water potential at different heights in a corn crop canopy ( Zea mays ) and with time during a period of increasing drought stress were examined along with soil moisture tension and evapotranspiration ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–231 e2 “Transpiration was not detectably changed by the decrease in effective plant conductance and soil conductivity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1736–1845 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Reduced relative growth rate did not significantly affect adenylate energy charge.
adenylate energy charge (EC) e0 did not significantly affect e0 decrease in relative growth rate e0 Not reported Material Gene Compound Organ / stage Interactor Treatment Comparator Setting
Verbatim
e0 “decrease in relative growth rate did not significantly affect the adenylate energy charge (EC) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1022 t0 “Lemna gibba
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–67 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Vitis
Lotus japonicus
Bazzania trilobata
Xanthium strumarium
Glycine max
Lolium perenne
Oryza sativa
Solanum lycopersicum
Lactuca sativa
Triticum aestivum
Gossypium hirsutum
Zea mays subsp. mays
Lemna gibba