View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing soil lead did not significantly decrease R. rugosum dry weight .
Treatmentincreasing concentration of Pb e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “with increasing concentration of Pb, dry weight of R. rugosum and S. arvensis did not decrease significantly. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–545 Other claims from this paper (14) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing soil lead did not significantly decrease S. arvensis dry weight .
Treatmentincreasing concentration of Pb e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “with increasing concentration of Pb, dry weight of R. rugosum and S. arvensis did not decrease significantly. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 436–545 Other claims from this paper (14) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Nematode exposure did not significantly decrease root and shoot dry weight in subterranean clover cv Denmark.
Taxonwhite and annual clovers t0 Outcomeplant root and shoot dry weight e0 Directionno significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “no significant decrease in plant root and shoot dry weight when exposed to nematodes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1102 t0 “white and annual clovers ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–57 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Treated wastewater showed a nonsignificant dry weight decrease .
Treatmenttreated wastewater e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “both treated and untreated wastewater showed insignificant decrease in dry weight of barley. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1138 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Untreated wastewater showed a nonsignificant dry weight decrease .
Treatmentuntreated wastewater e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “both treated and untreated wastewater showed insignificant decrease in dry weight of barley. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1138 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
UV-B did not significantly decrease lettuce shoot fresh or dry weight .
Outcomefresh/dry weight of the lettuce shoots e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “UV-B exposure did not significantly decrease the fresh/ dry weight of the lettuce shoots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 413–500 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf and root dry weight did not decrease significantly.
Outcomeleaf and root dry weight e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “while leaf and root dry weight did not ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–288 t0 “carnation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–35 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At 2 mM Al, citric acid did not significantly decrease dry weight .
Directionno significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “Citric acid increased fresh weight by 8%, had no significant decrease on dry weight , but significantly decrease d chlorophyll content by 16% (Al2 CA5 vs. Al2 CA0) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–897 e1 “At 2 mM Al ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 571–581 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–33 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Adding Almix to butachlor did not significantly decrease weed dry weight compared with butachlor alone.
TreatmentButachlor and Almix as tank mixture e0 Outcomedry weight of weeds e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Comparatoralone application of butachlor at corresponding dose e0 Verbatim
e0 “Butachlor and Almix as tank mixture did not significantly decrease the dry weight of weeds over the alone application of butachlor at corresponding dose ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–738 t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–102 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
SO 2 exposure did not significantly decrease total dry weight relative to controls.
Outcometotal dry weight e0 Directionno significant decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “no significant decrease in the total dry weight of SO 2 ‐treated plants in comparison with controls ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–377 t0 “Polygonum cuspidatum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–97 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Chlorflurenol did not significantly decrease plant fresh and dry weight .
Treatmentthis morphactin e0 Outcomefresh and dry weights e0 Directiondid not significantly decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “However, this morphactin did not significantly decrease the fresh and dry weight s of plants. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–421 t0 “TOURNESOL ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–105 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Supplemental UV-B did not significantly decrease dry weight in pea.
Treatmentsupplemental enhancement of 32 mW m −2 effective UV-B radiation e0 Directionnot significantly decreased e0 Comparatorcontrol plants that received only solar UV-B radiation e0 Verbatim
e0 “The dry weight s of all 4 species and pea and wheat plant height were not significantly decrease d by a supplemental enhancement of 32 mW m −2 effective UV-B radiation from cellulose acetate filtered FS-40 sunlamps for 6 hours each day, relative to control plants that received only solar UV-B radiation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–1138 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The growth regulator treatments did not significantly decrease dry weight per stem.
Treatmentmepiquat chloride and ethephon e6 Directiondid not decrease significantly e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “six cultivars of winter barley grown in Belfast, UK, in 1986/87 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–266 e5 “The growth regulator treatments reduced plant height and although dry weight /stem did not decrease significantly, dry weight /unit length of stem was similar in treated and untreated plots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1126 e6 “Applications of nitrogen and a plant growth regulator (mepiquat chloride and ethephon) were used to manipulate stem structure ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–133 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Brushing typically had no significant effects on leaf area, dry weight or days to flower of pansy.
Treatment10 or 20 brush strokes per day e0 Outcomeleaf area, dry weight or days to flower e0 Directionwithout significant effects e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Pansy plants were undamaged by 10 or 20 brush strokes per day and showed a significant (17–22%) decrease in petiole length, typically without significant effects on leaf area, dry weight or days to flower. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1664–1869 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cassava leaf area declined without a significant change in leaf dry weight .
Treatmentinfested with P. manihoti e2 Directionwithout significant change e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In cassava the decrease in leaf area, without significant change in leaf dry weight , appeared to be due to physiological changes in plants similar to those induced by water stress. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1074 e1 “cassava mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti Matt. Ferr. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–290 e2 “plants infested with P. manihoti ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–428 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.