Refine

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tool increased repeatability.

Outcome
repeatabilitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the repeatability in results were increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1522

Title

Leaf detector box: Artificial vision system for leaf area identification

Manuel Agudelo Restrepo Cristian; Eduardo Roa-Guerrero Edgar; Numpaque López Humberto African Journal of Agricultural Research 2017. doi:10.5897/ajar2016.11698

Other claims from this paper (7)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two repeatability methods agreed in magnitude, though repeatability differed among 14 traits.

Outcome
repeatability coefficientse0
Comparator
the two methodse0

Verbatim

e0

“There was agreement on the magnitude of repeatability coefficients obtained by the two methods; however, they varied among the 14 characteristics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1025
e1

“ANOVA and CPCOR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–651
t0

“peach fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101

Title

Repeatability, correlation and path analysis of physical and chemical characteristics of peach fruits

Rosana Gonçalves Pires Matias; Claudio Horst Bruckner; Pedro Crescêncio Souza Carneiro; et al. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura 2014. doi:10.1590/0100-2945-272/13

Other claims from this paper (4)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Assay repeatability was 8.5%.

Taxon
Ornithogalum caudatum AitAlbuca bracteatat0
Outcome
repeatabilitye0
Value
8.5%e0

Verbatim

e0

“repeatability 8.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–324
t0

“Ornithogalum caudatum Ait”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–55

Title

Polysaccharide Assay Study of Ornithogalum caudatum Ait

WU Li-jun Modern Chinese Medicine 2011

Other claims from this paper (7)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tree height repeatability exceeded diameter repeatability at all sites.

Taxon
Populus deltoidesPopulus deltoidese1
Outcome
repeatabilitye0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
DBHe0

Verbatim

e0

“the repeatability and heritability of tree height were greater than those of DBH at all sites”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–616
e1

“Populus deltoides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–56

Title

G×E Analysis of Early Growth Traits of Populus deltoides in East China by Using BLUP-GGE

Zhengsai Yuan; Yufeng Dong; Ning Liu; et al. Forests 2022. doi:10.3390/f13111808

Other claims from this paper (12)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simplified AmpSeq showed high repeatability.

Outcome
repeatabilitye0
Value
high repeatabilitye0

Not reportedTaxonMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Simplified AmpSeq has the advantages of high repeatability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1118

Title

Rapid and easy construction of a simplified amplicon sequencing (simplified AmpSeq) library for marker-assisted selection

Sogo Nishio; Shigeki Moriya; Miyuki Kunihisa; et al. Scientific Reports 2023. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-37522-1

Other claims from this paper (5)
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The HPLC-RID sugar method showed high repeatability accuracy and effectiveness in accuracy and repeatability tests.

Outcome
repeatability accuracye2
Qualifier
highe2

Verbatim

e0

“a method of extracting soluble sugar from peanut kernel by 80% ethanol and water bath was established”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–379
e2

“The accuracy and repeatability tests showed that this method had high repeatability accuracy and effectiveness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–616

Title

Establishment of HPLC-RID method for the determination of soluble sugars in peanut seed

Wei-Tao LI; Jian-Bin GUO; Bo-Lun YU; et al. ACTA AGRONOMICA SINICA 2020. doi:10.3724/sp.j.1006.2021.04110

Other claims from this paper (6)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The HPLC method showed good repeatability.

Taxon
Rumex gmelinit0
Outcome
good repeatabilitye0
Value
good repeatabilitye0

Not reportedMaterialOrgan / stageInteractorTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“this method has a good repeatability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–515
t0

“Rumex gmelini”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–33

Title

HPLC fingerprint of Rumex gmelini from different habitats

Cui Honghua 2005

Other claims from this paper (2)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fingerprint method showed good repeatability.

Outcome
repeatabilitye0
Direction
goode0
Comparator
this methode0

Verbatim

e0

“this method had a good repeatability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–386

Title

Fingerprint of Flos Lonicerae by HPLC-FPC

Qian Wang Zhongchengyao 2005

Other claims from this paper (4)
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TSS, TTA and bunch length had low repeatability.

Taxon
grapest0
Outcome
repeatability coefficientse0
Direction
10we0

Verbatim

e0

“The traits TSS, TTA and bunch length presented 10w repeatability coefficients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1105
t0

“grapes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58

Title

Estimates of repeatability and path coefficients on grapes

Patrícia Coelho de Souza Leão; João Gomes da Costa DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2003

Other claims from this paper (4)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeatability of S 2 i and r 2 i was low.

Outcome
repeatabilitye0
Value
lowe0

Verbatim

e0

“repeatability of S 2 i and r 2 i s were low”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1059
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62

Title

Repeatability of Stability Estimators for Grain Yield in Wheat

Md. Jalaluddin; S. A. Harrison Crop Science 1993. doi:10.2135/cropsci1993.0011183x003300040017x

Other claims from this paper (6)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gin reflectance repeatability was lower than laboratory repeatability.

Outcome
reflectance measurementse0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
laboratory measurementse0

Verbatim

e0

“reflectance measurements had a lower repeatability for the gin measurements than for the laboratory measurements.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1018
e1

“Samples were collected from the cotton during gin processing throughout the ginning seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–460

Title

Field Evaluation of Color/Trash Meters

W. S. Anthony Applied Engineering in Agriculture 1992. doi:10.13031/2013.26068

Other claims from this paper (12)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeatability of b1 was 0.61.

Outcome
repeatability of b 1e0
Value
0.61e0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The repeatability of b 1 was 0.61”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1306
t0

“Oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–43

Title

Selection for Yield and Stability among Oat Lines

Theodore C. Helms Crop Science 1993. doi:10.2135/cropsci1993.0011183x003300030001x

Other claims from this paper (9)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific leaf weight repeatability was 0.48.

Taxon
SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
Repeatability for SLWe0
Value
0.48e0

Verbatim

e0

“Repeatability for SLW was 0.48”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1574
t0

“Soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–18

Title

Evaluating Soybean Germplasm for Specific Leaf Weight

Randall L. Nelson; Lee E. Schweitzer Crop Science 1988. doi:10.2135/cropsci1988.0011183x002800040016x

Other claims from this paper (3)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeatability of glandular-hair density was 0.74.

Taxon
alfalfaMedicago sativae1
Outcome
repeatabilitye0
Value
0.74e0

Verbatim

e0

“A repeatability of 0.74 was obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1266
e1

“tetraploid population of alfalfa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–104

Title

Inheritance of Density of Erect Glandular Trichomes in the Genus Medicago1

L. W. Kitch; R. E. Shade; W. E. Nyquist; et al. Crop Science 1985. doi:10.2135/cropsci1985.0011183x002500040007x

Other claims from this paper (9)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single-year yield rankings had the highest repeatability, about 0.80.

Outcome
Repeatability of single year resultse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
about 0.80e0

Verbatim

e0

“Repeatability of single year results was highest for yield, where rank correlation coefficients amounted to about 0.80.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–727
e1

“wheat, barley and oat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–220

Title

Repeatability of Some Statistical Measures of Phenotypic Stability —

J. Léon; H. C. Becker Plant Breeding 1988. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0523.1988.tb00228.x

Other claims from this paper (4)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeatability for stalk number and diameter was about equal between plant crops and first ratoon crops.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Organ / stage
first ratoon cropse3
Outcome
Repeatability for stalk number and diametere3

Verbatim

e1

“among 6 crops of sugarcane ( Saccharum sp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–100
e3

“Repeatability for stalk number and diameter was about equal between plant crops and first ratoon crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–347

Title

Selection in Six Crops of Sugarcane. I. Repeatability of Three Characters

J. D. Miller; N. I. James Crop Science 1975. doi:10.2135/cropsci1975.0011183x001500010006x

Other claims from this paper (6)
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype by environment interaction produced heritability ratios below repeatability ratios.

Material
genotypee0
Outcome
heritability ratiose0
Direction
smaller thane0
Comparator
comparable repeatability ratiose0

Verbatim

e0

“However, a significant genotype by environment interaction resulted in heritability ratios that were smaller than comparable repeatability ratios.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–592
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61

Title

EVALUATION OF AN ARTIFICIAL TEST FOR FROST HARDINESS IN WHEAT

D. B. FOWLER; D. SIMINOVITCH; M. K. POMEROY Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1973. doi:10.4141/cjps73-008

Other claims from this paper (3)
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Test repeatability was sufficient to detect meaningful differences in frost hardiness.

Outcome
repeatabilitye0
Comparator
meaningful differences in frost hardinesse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The level of repeatability of the test was considered sufficient to allow for the detection of meaningful differences in frost hardiness.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–445
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61

Title

EVALUATION OF AN ARTIFICIAL TEST FOR FROST HARDINESS IN WHEAT

D. B. FOWLER; D. SIMINOVITCH; M. K. POMEROY Canadian Journal of Plant Science 1973. doi:10.4141/cjps73-008

Other claims from this paper (3)
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brix repeatability across crops was .389**.

Outcome
Brixe0
Value
.389**e0

Not reportedTaxonOrgan / stageDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Repeatability of characters between crops was .611**, .551**, and .389** for .389** for number of stalks, diameter of stalks, and Brix, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 200–348

Title

Association of Characters Within and Repeatability Between Years in Progenies of Four Sugarcane Crosses

Garry A. Smith; Norman I. James Crop Science 1969. doi:10.2135/cropsci1969.0011183x000900060046x

Other claims from this paper (6)
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stalk number repeatability across crops was .611**.

Organ / stage
stalkse0
Outcome
number of stalkse0
Value
.611**e0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Repeatability of characters between crops was .611**, .551**, and .389** for .389** for number of stalks, diameter of stalks, and Brix, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 200–348

Title

Association of Characters Within and Repeatability Between Years in Progenies of Four Sugarcane Crosses

Garry A. Smith; Norman I. James Crop Science 1969. doi:10.2135/cropsci1969.0011183x000900060046x

Other claims from this paper (6)
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stalk diameter repeatability across crops was .551**.

Organ / stage
stalkse0
Outcome
diameter of stalkse0
Value
.551**e0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Repeatability of characters between crops was .611**, .551**, and .389** for .389** for number of stalks, diameter of stalks, and Brix, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 200–348

Title

Association of Characters Within and Repeatability Between Years in Progenies of Four Sugarcane Crosses

Garry A. Smith; Norman I. James Crop Science 1969. doi:10.2135/cropsci1969.0011183x000900060046x

Other claims from this paper (6)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strain repeatability measured by intraclass correlation was 86 per cent.

Taxon
Trifolium subterraneum LTrifolium subterraneumt0
Outcome
Strain repeatabilitye0
Value
86 per cent.e0

Verbatim

e0

“Strain repeatability, as measured by intraclass correlation, was 86 per cent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–617
t0

“Trifolium subterraneum L”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–61

Title

The inheritance of flowering time in Trifolium subterraneum L

CI Davern; JW Peak; FHW Morley Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 1957. doi:10.1071/ar9570121

Other claims from this paper (6)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.