View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The tool increased repeatability .
Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the repeatability in results were increased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1479–1522 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The two repeatability methods agreed in magnitude, though repeatability differed among 14 traits.
Outcomerepeatability coefficients e0 Comparatorthe two methods e0 Verbatim
e0 “There was agreement on the magnitude of repeatability coefficients obtained by the two methods; however, they varied among the 14 characteristics ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1025 e1 “ANOVA and CPCOR ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–651 t0 “peach fruits ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–101 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Assay repeatability was 8.5%.
Verbatim
e0 “repeatability 8.5% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 306–324 t0 “Ornithogalum caudatum Ait ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–55 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Tree height repeatability exceeded diameter repeatability at all sites.
Verbatim
e0 “the repeatability and heritability of tree height were greater than those of DBH at all sites ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–616 e1 “Populus deltoides ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–56 Other claims from this paper (12) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Simplified AmpSeq showed high repeatability .
Valuehigh repeatability e0 Not reported Taxon Material Gene Compound Organ / stage Interactor Interactor role Second interactor Second interactor role Treatment Comparator Setting Direction Qualifier
Verbatim
e0 “Simplified AmpSeq has the advantages of high repeatability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1118 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The HPLC-RID sugar method showed high repeatability accuracy and effectiveness in accuracy and repeatability tests.
Outcomerepeatability accuracy e2 Verbatim
e0 “a method of extracting soluble sugar from peanut kernel by 80% ethanol and water bath was established ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–379 e2 “The accuracy and repeatability tests showed that this method had high repeatability accuracy and effectiveness ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–616 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The HPLC method showed good repeatability .
Outcomegood repeatability e0 Valuegood repeatability e0 Not reported Material Organ / stage Interactor Treatment Comparator Setting Direction Qualifier
Verbatim
e0 “this method has a good repeatability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–515 t0 “Rumex gmelini ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–33 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The fingerprint method showed good repeatability .
Verbatim
e0 “this method had a good repeatability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–386 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
TSS, TTA and bunch length had low repeatability .
Outcomerepeatability coefficients e0 Verbatim
e0 “The traits TSS, TTA and bunch length presented 10w repeatability coefficients ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1105 t0 “grapes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 52–58 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Repeatability of S 2 i and r 2 i was low.
Verbatim
e0 “repeatability of S 2 i and r 2 i s were low ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1059 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Gin reflectance repeatability was lower than laboratory repeatability .
Outcomereflectance measurements e0 Comparatorlaboratory measurements e0 Verbatim
e0 “reflectance measurements had a lower repeatability for the gin measurements than for the laboratory measurements. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1018 e1 “Samples were collected from the cotton during gin processing throughout the ginning seasons ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–460 Other claims from this paper (12) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Repeatability of b1 was 0.61.
Outcomerepeatability of b 1 e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The repeatability of b 1 was 0.61 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1273–1306 t0 “Oat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–43 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Specific leaf weight repeatability was 0.48.
OutcomeRepeatability for SLW e0 Verbatim
e0 “Repeatability for SLW was 0.48 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1574 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–18 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Repeatability of glandular-hair density was 0.74.
Verbatim
e0 “A repeatability of 0.74 was obtained ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1266 e1 “tetraploid population of alfalfa ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 72–104 Other claims from this paper (9) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Single-year yield rankings had the highest repeatability , about 0.80.
OutcomeRepeatability of single year results e0 Verbatim
e0 “Repeatability of single year results was highest for yield, where rank correlation coefficients amounted to about 0.80. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 608–727 e1 “wheat, barley and oat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–220 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Repeatability for stalk number and diameter was about equal between plant crops and first ratoon crops.
Organ / stagefirst ratoon crops e3 OutcomeRepeatability for stalk number and diameter e3 Verbatim
e1 “among 6 crops of sugarcane ( Saccharum sp.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–100 e3 “Repeatability for stalk number and diameter was about equal between plant crops and first ratoon crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–347 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Genotype by environment interaction produced heritability ratios below repeatability ratios.
Outcomeheritability ratios e0 Comparatorcomparable repeatability ratios e0 Verbatim
e0 “However, a significant genotype by environment interaction resulted in heritability ratios that were smaller than comparable repeatability ratios. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–592 t0 “WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Test repeatability was sufficient to detect meaningful differences in frost hardiness.
Comparatormeaningful differences in frost hardiness e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “The level of repeatability of the test was considered sufficient to allow for the detection of meaningful differences in frost hardiness. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–445 t0 “WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–61 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Brix repeatability across crops was .389**.
Not reported Taxon Organ / stage Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Repeatability of characters between crops was .611**, .551**, and .389** for .389** for number of stalks, diameter of stalks, and Brix, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 200–348 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Stalk number repeatability across crops was .611**.
Outcomenumber of stalks e0 Not reported Taxon Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Repeatability of characters between crops was .611**, .551**, and .389** for .389** for number of stalks, diameter of stalks, and Brix, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 200–348 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Stalk diameter repeatability across crops was .551**.
Outcomediameter of stalks e0 Not reported Taxon Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Repeatability of characters between crops was .611**, .551**, and .389** for .389** for number of stalks, diameter of stalks, and Brix, respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 200–348 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Strain repeatability measured by intraclass correlation was 86 per cent.
OutcomeStrain repeatability e0 Verbatim
e0 “Strain repeatability , as measured by intraclass correlation, was 86 per cent. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–617 t0 “Trifolium subterraneum L ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–61 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.