View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Zea mays ✕
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salt stress similarly reduced leaf relative water content in both maize cultivars.
Outcomeleaf relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “salt stress caused a similar decrease in leaf relative water content in both maize cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1089 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought significantly decrease d maize relative water content .
Treatmentdrought condition e0 Outcomerelative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “drought condition caused a significant decrease in biomass, total chlorophyll, relative water content (RWC) of the plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–983 t0 “Zea mays seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Osmotic stress decrease d seedling relative water content .
Treatmentosmotic stress t0 Outcomeseedling relative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in seedling relative water content (RWC) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1153 t0 “osmotic stress resistance by improving leaf photosynthetic physiology and antioxidant capacity in maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–144 Other claims from this paper (15) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
In maize under elevated CO2, leaf relative water content starts to decrease at a lower FTSW threshold than in wheat (0.21 vs 0.43).
Outcomeleaf relative water content e6 Directionstarts to decrease e6 Verbatim
e5 “After onset of progressive soil drying, maize plants in e[CO 2 ] showed lower FTSW thresholds than wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–899 e6 “at which e.g. g s (0.31 vs 0.40) and leaf relative water content (0.21 vs 0.43) starts to decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–999 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 increased the net photosynthetic rate only in wheat. Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 increased dry matter accumulation in wheat and maize. Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 decreased stomatal conductance and water consumption. Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 enhanced WUE by 27.82% in maize. Intervention effect Under non-drought stress, elevated CO2 enhanced WUE by 49.86% in wheat. Association After onset of progressive soil drying, maize under elevated CO2 showed lower FTSW thresholds than wheat. Association In maize under elevated CO2, stomatal conductance starts to decrease at a lower FTSW threshold than in wheat (0.31 vs 0.40). Association The authors interpret elevated CO2 as conferring greater drought resistance in maize. Association Under combined elevated CO2 and drought, enhanced WUE was found only in wheat. Association Under combined elevated CO2 and drought, DMA increased in wheat. Association Under combined elevated CO2 and drought, water consumption was unaffected in wheat. Recommendation The authors recommend developing specific water management strategies to optimize crop WUE for different species under future drier, CO2-enriched conditions. Association observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf relative water content decrease d with salt, but the decline was not significant.
Treatmentincreasing salt e0 OutcomeLeaf relative water content e0 Verbatim
e0 “Leaf relative water content decrease d with in creasing salt, but this decrease was not significant. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–957 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 103–108 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Reduced relative water content was accompanied by in creased stomatal resistance and leaf temperature.
Outcomestomatal resistance and leaf temperature e0 Qualifierdecrease in RWC e0 Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in RWC was accompanied by an in crease in stomatal resistance and leaf temperature ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1873–1967 t0 “maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 Other claims from this paper (15) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf aging and declining chlorophyll and absorbance accompanied a decrease in maize Pn.
Qualifierleaves would age, and the gradual decrease of chlorophyll relative content and Ab e0 Verbatim
e0 “As the growth period progressed, the leaves would age, and the gradual decrease of chlorophyll relative content and Ab led to a gradual decrease in maize Pn. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1670–1827 Other claims from this paper (18) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The improved lines had higher relative water content under drought.
Qualifierunder drought stress e0 Verbatim
e0 “This improvement was related to the enhancement of water -retention ability, as in dicated by higher RWC and the reduction in damage, as shown by the decrease in REL, MDA, and H2O2 under drought stress. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1755–1955 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–60 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.