View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing orchard density did not significantly decrease yield.
increasing the density e0 does not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “SOUR CHERRY ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–91 e0 “in creasing the density in the orchard, the yield does not decrease significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1858–1938 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At low versus high sowing density , grain yield in modern wheat cultivars did not decrease significantly.
modern cultivars e0 low sowing density e0 did not decrease e0 high sowing density e0 Verbatim
e0 “Compared to high sowing density , in modern cultivars grain yield did not decrease significantly with low sowing density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1024 t0 “common wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Tree diameter showed a marginal, non-significant decrease with in creasing planting density .
planting density e3 500 trees per hectare e1 Verbatim
t0 “Hevea brasiliensis
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–64 e1 “Rubber was planted in three high densities, i.e., 600, 700 and 800 trees per hectare, with the presently recommended level of 500 trees per hectare ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1277 e3 “Though not statistically significant, there was a marginal decrease in tree diameter with the in crease in planting density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1882–2004 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Forage rice total digestible nutrient content did not decrease significantly with in creasing skipper density .
total digestible nutrients content e0 did not decrease e0 increasing larval density e1 Verbatim
e0 “total digestible nutrients content did not decrease significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–761 e1 “in creasing larval density on the rice plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–686 e2 “rice skipper Parnara guttata guttata Bremer et Grey larvae ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–115 Other claims from this paper (2) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The relationship between nematode density and decrease in yield components was statistically in significant.
Verbatim
t0 “Response of some rice cultivars to rice white tip nematode ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–58 e3 “The relationship between nematode density and decreasing in yield component of varieties was statistically in significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–847 Other claims from this paper (2) Association observed original result negative not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing bulk density reduced root length and surface area in barley nonsignificantly.
root length and root surface area e0 Verbatim
e0 “as the bulk density in creased, root length and root surface area decrease (statistically significant in common vetch and nonsignificant in Italian ryegrass and barley) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–789 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Nutrient density unit under ORD did not decrease significantly.
nutrient density unit (NDU) e0 did not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “its nutrient density unit (NDU) did not decrease significantly due to the additional duck yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–635 t0 “rice–duck coculture ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–112 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil in oculum density did not significantly decrease from 1 to 12 months after in corporation.
soil inoculum density e0 not a significant decrease e0 1 and 12 months e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Regardless of treatment, there was not a significant decrease in soil in oculum density between 1 and 12 months after residue was in corporated ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–907 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
December NSC concentration remained high and did not decrease significantly under high forest density .
NSC concentration e0 did not significantly decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “the NSC concentration in December remained at a high level and did not significantly decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1166 t0 “Vitex negundo Var. heterophylla
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–114 Other claims from this paper (5) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Prunus cerasust0
Triticum aestivum
Hevea brasiliensis
Oryza sativa
Parnara guttata.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Hordeum vulgare
Vitex negundo var. heterophylla