View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought-stressed alfalfa plants showed a significant decrease in relative water content of 7.45%.
Treatmentdrought-stressed e0 Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In drought-stressed alfalfa plants, we observed a significant decrease in the relative water content (7.45%) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1057 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Only common bean had a significant decrease in relative water content .
Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Significant relative water content reduction was detected only in CB. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1567–1636 t0 “Common Bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–46 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress decrease d leaf area and relative water content in mulberry, with a marked decrease only in severe stress.
Outcomeleaf area and relative water content e2 Qualifiera marked decrease was observed only in severe stress treatment e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “in 3-month-old mulberry plants at four levels of water stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–148 e2 “Though leaf area and relative water content decrease d, significantly, a marked decrease was observed only in severe stress treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–380 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative water content significantly decrease d at the most polluted sites.
Outcomerelative water content e0 Settingmost polluted sites e0 Verbatim
e0 “Chlorophyll content (up to 0.61mg/g) and relative water content have shown a significant decrease at most polluted sites ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1102 t0 “WHEAT AND RICE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–47 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative water content decrease d significantly as drought stress in tensified.
Treatmentdrought stress e0 Outcomerelative water content (RWC) e0 Verbatim
e0 “The results exhibit a significant decrease in stomata conductance (cs) and in relative water content (RWC) with the in crease in the in tensity of drought stress. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–706 e1 “Ceratonia siliqua L. in Algeria ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–392 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative water content declined as soil moisture decrease d in all scions.
Treatmentsoil moisture content e0 OutcomeRelative water content e0 QualifierR2 = 0.9915, P<0.001 e0 Verbatim
e0 “Relative water content declined with decrease in soil moisture content (R2 = 0.9915, P<0.001) in all the scions. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1025 t0 “Tea ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–26 Other claims from this paper (13) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Mulltingia calabura had a significant reduction in relative water content .
TaxonMulltingia calabura e0 Verbatim
e0 “A significant decrease in RWC was noticed in Mulltingia calabura ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–712 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Yellow rust significantly decrease d wheat leaf area in dex, membrane stability in dex, and relative leaf water content .
Outcomeleaf area index, membrane stability index, relative leaf water content e0 Verbatim
e0 “there was a significant decrease in crop photosynthesis, transpiration, stomatal conductance, leaf area in dex, membrane stability in dex, relative leaf water content , and normalized difference vegetation in dex due to rust ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–883 e1 “24 wheat cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–354 Other claims from this paper (11) Association Canopy temperature increased as wheat rust increased. Observation Yellow rust significantly decreased wheat photosynthesis, transpiration, and stomatal conductance. Observation Yellow rust significantly decreased wheat normalized difference vegetation index. Association Reductions in wheat physiological traits were directly correlated with rust severity. Observation Moderately resistant cultivars lost 15.9-16.9% yield relative to resistant cultivars. Observation Low resistant cultivars lost 28.6-34.4% yield relative to resistant cultivars. Observation Susceptible cultivars lost 59-61.1% yield relative to resistant cultivars. Method / resource Machine learning yield estimates became more accurate nearer harvest. Method / resource Cubist, PLS, and SpikeSlab predicted wheat yield effectively at 55-60 days after sowing. Method / resource KNN, Cubist, SLR, RF, SpikeSlab, XGB, GPR, and PLS were useful for wheat yield prediction at 70 days after sowing. Method / resource RF, SpikeSlab, KNN, Cubist, ELNET, GPR, SLR, XGB, and MARS predicted wheat yield well at 80 days after sowing. Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Phytoplasma in fection significantly reduced midday relative water content in symptomatic leaves.
Organ / stagesymptomatic leaves e0 Verbatim
e0 “The phytoplasma in fection also stimulated significant reductions in mRWC of the symptomatic leaves, with a final large decrease in yield. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1498 t0 “grapevine (Vitis vinifera ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–130 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.