View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper A claim can belong to several research areas, so group counts add up to more than the total.
Organism groups follow NCBI Taxonomy: the spellings of one organism are merged, a claim naming several organisms sits in each group, and claims whose value names no organism are under “not stated”.
not stated 411 Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
A suitable decrease in sowing density in creased panicle rate.
Treatmentsuitable decrease of sowing density e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “suitable decrease of sowing density is beneficial to in crease panicle rate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–414 t0 “Early Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–73 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Soil treatments had the slowest density decrease in the 1999 planting.
Treatmentsoil treatments e0 Directionslowest decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “highest in itial emergence and slowest decrease in density occurring in soil treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1362 e1 “Disturbance only affected the 1999 planting ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1226–1269 e2 “measured forage kochia density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–733 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Management relaxation was associated with a decrease in vegetation density .
Treatmentmanagement relaxation e1 Outcomevegetation density e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “mountain grasslands ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–88 e1 “A higher butterfly abundance and species richness following management relaxation was mostly driven by a decrease in vegetation density and an in crease in forb cover. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1374 Other claims from this paper (2) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The mitochondrial pool decrease affected low- and in termediate- density mitochondria.
Treatmentglucose-starved e1 Outcomelow- and intermediate-density mitochondria e0 Comparatorhigher-density mitochondria e0 Verbatim
e0 “this decrease affected low- and in termediate- density mitochondria, but not higher- density mitochondria ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1358–1460 e1 “preparations from glucose-starved maize root tips ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1180 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing planting density caused a linear decrease in the 100-grain weight of maize.
Treatmentplanting density e1 Outcome100-grain weight e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “PRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE OF MAIZE CROP ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–36 e1 “The in crement of planting density caused a linear decrease in the 100-grain weight and in crement of the cob percentage in relation to the total ear weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–885 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
In creased N supply weakened the decrease in KNP and TKW caused by enhanced density .
TreatmentIncreased N supply e0 Outcomedecreased KNP and TKW caused by enhanced density e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–5 e0 “In creased N supply weakened the decrease d KNP and TKW caused by enhanced density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1018 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing planting density decrease Tiller numbers in hill in rice.
Treatmentplanting density e0 OutcomeTiller numbers in hill e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Tiller numbers in hill was decrease with in creasing of planting density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1092 t0 “rice (Oryza sativa L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–132 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In Fujiminori, the decrease in grain weight with irregular disposition was more marked at low seeding density than at high seeding density .
Treatmentlow seeding density e1 Outcomedecrease of grain weight e1 Verbatim
t0 “Irregular Disposition of Rice Plant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–49 e1 “In Fujiminori, decrease of grain weight with irregular disposition of plants was more marked in the case of low seeding density than in that of high one ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1390 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Rhizosphere bacterial network complexity and density did not decrease in three Bt rice lines relative to the non-Bt line.
Treatmentthree Bt rice lines e0 Outcomenetwork complexity and density e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Verbatim
t0 “Bt-transgenic rice plantings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–51 e0 “network complexity and density for the three Bt rice lines did not decrease compared with those for the non-Bt line ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1321 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Defoliation caused a substantial decrease in wheat root density .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Temporary growth cessation of wheat roots following defoliation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–63 e2 “This caused a substantial decrease in root density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–934 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At low versus high sowing density , grain yield in modern wheat cultivars did not decrease significantly.
Materialmodern cultivars e0 Treatmentlow sowing density e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Comparatorhigh sowing density e0 Verbatim
e0 “Compared to high sowing density , in modern cultivars grain yield did not decrease significantly with low sowing density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1024 t0 “common wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
A third year without wheat gave no further wild oat density decrease .
Treatmenta third year without wheat e0 Outcomeadditional decrease e0 Directionno additional decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “wild oats in wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–33 e0 “a third year without wheat gave no additional decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–595 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Under low plant density the overall soybean yield may slightly decrease .
TreatmentLow plant density e3 Qualifiermay slightly decrease e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–60 e3 “Low plant density helps improve in dividual plant growth and nutrient use efficiency, although the overall yield may slightly decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–421 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Delaying sowing and in creasing density changed the yield of Hefeng 50 in an in crease-then- decrease trend.
Treatmentsowing date delayed and density increased e1 Directionincrease-and-then-decrease trend e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “New soybean variety Hefeng 50 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–29 e1 “with the sowing date delayed and density in creased,the yield of Hefeng 50 showed in crease-and-then- decrease trend ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 313–426 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher density decrease d carbohydrate accumulation duration by 13%.
Outcomecontinuous accumulation time ( t c ) of these carbohydrates e0 Comparatorlower planting density (PD1) e1 Verbatim
e0 “a 29% decrease in the maximum accumulation rate ( c max ) of sucrose, lignin, and cellulose was observed, along with a 13% decrease in the continuous accumulation time ( t c ) of these carbohydrates in in tercropped soybean at PD3 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1163–1392 e1 “compared to the lower planting density (PD1) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1147 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
High humidity did not decrease stomatal density in barley.
Outcomestomatal density e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “decrease d stomatal density in tomato, but not in barley. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–849 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher sowing density decrease d grain number per spike.
Treatmenthigher sowing density e0 Outcomegrain number per spike e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the higher sowing density brought about a decrease in the grain number per spike ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–664 t0 “spring barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–51 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer treatments reduced soil bulk density .
Treatmentmineral and organic fertilizer e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a relative decrease in bulk density in all treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–820 e1 “mineral and organic fertilizer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–347 e2 “barley crop characteristics ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 376–403 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Sesame produced the greatest significant reduction in broomrape density .
InteractorBroomrape e0 parasite OutcomeBroomrape density e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Results showed that sesame had most significant decrease in Broomrape density . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–967 e1 “damage reduction to tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–246 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Nutsedge density decrease d rapidly at 570 L·ha –1 Propozone.
Outcomenutsedge density e0 Directionrapid decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Examined data in dicated that there was a rapid decrease in nutsedge density with 570 L·ha –1 . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–740 t0 “TOMATO NUTRIENT ABSORPTION AND NUTSEDGE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–39 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Pretransplant S-metolachlor did not reduce purple nutsedge density .
TreatmentS -metolachlor e0 Interactorpurple nutsedge e0 weed Outcomepurple nutsedge density e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Comparatornontreated control e0 Verbatim
e0 “Pre-T treatment of sulfentrazone or S -metolachlor alone were in effective and did not decrease purple nutsedge density compared with the nontreated control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–514 t0 “tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–74 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect author interpretation original result positive simulated Claim · model-written summary
Non-GM pure-line high- density short-season varieties could decrease in secticide use in cotton.
TreatmentNon-GM pure-line high-density short-season varieties e3 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e3 “Non-GM pure-line high- density short-season varieties could double rainfed cotton yield, reduce costs, decrease in secticide use, and help ameliorate suicides ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2173–2329 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
HIC knockdown markedly decrease s trichome density .
Treatmentknockdown of HIC e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “knockdown of HIC results in a marked decrease in density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–796 t0 “cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–31 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing plant density reduced cottonseed yield per hectare.
Outcomecottonseed yield/ha e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “cottonseed yield and quality ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–105 e0 “As plant density in creased, there was a decrease in cottonseed yield/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–280 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Corn plant mass tended to decrease as plant density of silage corn rose from 50 to 100 thousand plants per hectare across all hybrid maturity groups.
Treatmentincreasing plant density e1 Directiontended to decrease e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Corn productivity for silage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 e1 “the corn plant mass tended to decrease with in creasing plant density of the silage corn from 50 to 100 thousand plants per hectare across all the maturity groups of the hybrids ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1186 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect Plant mass of DN Anshlah decreased from 281.2 to 190.3 g at the BBCH 19 stage as plant density increased from 50 to 100 thousand plants per hectare. Intervention effect Plant mass of KWS Burito decreased from 278.6 to 244.0 g as plant density increased from 50 to 100 thousand plants per hectare. Intervention effect Plant mass of KWS Gendalf decreased from 361.4 to 292.3 g as plant density increased from 50 to 100 thousand plants per hectare. Intervention effect Plant mass of KWS BigBit decreased from 431.3 to 298.9 g as plant density increased from 50 to 100 thousand plants per hectare. Intervention effect Leaf area of DN Anshlah increased linearly from 2,011 to 3,197 cm² as plant density rose from 50,000 to 70,000 plants/ha, a 58.9% increase. Intervention effect Leaf area per plant decreased by 17.1% when plant density was raised further to 80,000 plants/ha. Intervention effect Corn cob mass at the BBCH 75 stage decreased with increasing crop density. Intervention effect Corn cob mass of DN Anshlah decreased from 329.9 to 213.4 g with increasing crop density at the BBCH 75 stage. Intervention effect Corn cob mass of KWS Burito decreased from 272.3 to 198.2 g with increasing crop density at the BBCH 75 stage. Intervention effect Corn cob mass of KWS Gendalf decreased from 293.2 to 241.2 g with increasing crop density at the BBCH 75 stage. Intervention effect Corn cob mass of KWS BigBit decreased from 348.9 to 244.3 g with increasing crop density at the BBCH 75 stage. Association Silage corn yield was highest at the BBCH 75 growth stage with a plant density of 50,000-70,000 plants per hectare. Association DN Anshlah produced the maximum yield of 50.41 tons per hectare at a plant density of 50,000 plants per hectare. Association KWS Burito produced 50.86 tons per hectare at 70,000 plants per hectare. Association KWS BigBit gave the highest yield, 50.87 tons per hectare, at 70,000 plants per hectare. Association The lowest yield, 49.13 tons per hectare, was recorded at a plant density of 90,000 plants per hectare. Association KWS Gendalf produced 52.03 and 53.72 tons per hectare at plant densities of 60,000 and 70,000 plants per hectare, respectively. Association KWS BigBit produced 50.35 and 50.87 tons per hectare at plant densities of 60,000 and 70,000 plants per hectare, respectively. Recommendation The optimal plant density for the highest green mass yield of corn under irrigation in the Northern Steppe of Ukraine is 70,000 plants per hectare. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing density decrease d grains per ear.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “decrease of grains per ear ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1967–1993 t0 “corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–112 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect Source-sink restriction and density significantly affected photosynthesis and assimilate remobilization rate, contribution and efficiency. Observation The untreated control had the highest grain yield, 868.67 g/m 2. Observation Removing 50% of the ear gave the lowest grain yield, 646.33 g/m 2. Intervention effect Removing 50% of the ear significantly decreased grain numbers but increased 1000-grain weight. Intervention effect Removing 50% of the ear increased 1000-grain weight. Observation Ear removal produced the lowest remobilization rate and contribution, 9.9%. Observation Defoliating upper leaves produced the highest remobilization rate and contribution, 39.31%. Observation Upper-leaf defoliation significantly decreased photosynthesis contribution to 60.69%. Intervention effect Increasing density significantly increased grain yield. Intervention effect Increasing density increased grains per square meter and 1000-grain weight. Observation At 90000 plants per hectare, grain yield was highest at 886.33 g/m 2. Observation At 90000 plants per hectare, photosynthesis contribution was lowest at 71.74%. Observation At 90000 plants per hectare, remobilization contribution was highest at 28.26%. Observation Upper-leaf defoliation at 90000 plants per hectare gave the highest remobilization contribution, 43.37%. Observation Upper-leaf defoliation at 90000 plants per hectare gave the lowest photosynthesis contribution, 56.63%. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Corn density decrease d after pre-cleaning.
Treatmentpre-cleaning process e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “CHEMICAL AND ENERGETIC CONTENT OF CORN BEFORE AND AFTER PRE-CLEANING ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 e0 “There was a decrease in density after the pre-cleaning process ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1301 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
UV-B decrease d stomatal density in lettuce.
TreatmentUV-B radiation e1 Outcomestomatal density e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “Lettuce plants subjected to UV-B radiation showed an in crease in callose and oxidative stress in dicators, as well as a decrease in stomatal density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–671 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Super absorbent hydrogels significantly decrease d soil saturated hydraulic conductivity and bulk density .
Treatmentsuper absorbent hydrogels e4 Outcomesoil saturated hydraulic conductivity and bulk density e4 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “soil hydro-physical properties and lettuce productivity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 300–355 e4 “The significant decrease in soil saturated hydraulic conductivity and bulk density confirms that super absorbent hydrogels could be recommended ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1362 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher photon flux density decrease d chlorophyll:carotenoid ratio in both cultivars.
Outcomechlorophyll:carotenoid ratio e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “decrease in chlorophyll:carotenoid ratio in response to higher PFD were found in both cultivars. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1685–1781 t0 “lettuce ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–78 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.