View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Interactor: A. nilotica ✕
Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Acacia nilotica shade did not affect angsana seedling survival.
A. nilotica shadee0 survival of the angsana and kabesak seedlings e0 does not affect e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A. nilotica shade does not affect the survival of the angsana and kabesak seedlings
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1544 t0 “Pterocarpus indicus
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–54 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Acacia nilotica shade did not affect kabesak seedling survival.
A. nilotica shadee0 survival of the angsana and kabesak seedlings e0 does not affect e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “A. nilotica shade does not affect the survival of the angsana and kabesak seedlings
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1544 t0 “Acacia leucophloea
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–30 Other claims from this paper (4) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The authors attributed failure of nursing kabesak and angsana to Acacia allelopathy together with prolonged drought.
unable to act as nurse plants for kabesak and angsana plants e0 allelopathy produced by A. nilotica plants accompanied by a drought in a long period of time e0 Verbatim
e0 “allelopathy produced by A. nilotica plants accompanied by a drought in a long period of time causes the plants is unable to act as nurse plants for kabesak and angsana plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1546–1720 t0 “Acacia leucophloea and Pterocarpus indicus
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–54 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Seven of the nine plant species found in the uninvaded area were absent from the A. nilotica invaded area.
A. nilotica invasione0 species detected in UIA were absent from IA e2 uninvaded area (UIA) e1 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “To determine the effect of A. nilotica invasion on plant species assemblages and diversity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–363 e1 “uninvaded area (UIA), invaded area (IA), and managed area (MA) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–632 e2 “Seven of the nine species detected in UIA were absent from IA, and the relative dominance of surviving plants also decreased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1049 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
A. nilotica had the least light transmission, 34.2%.
light transmission e0 Verbatim
e0 “least light transmission of 34.2% was observed in A. nilotica under agroforestry situation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–684 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Pterocarpus indicust0_flowers_at_Hodal_W_IMG_1163.jpg?width=60)
Vachellia niloticae0other
Vachellia leucophloea
Triticum aestivum