View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Triticum aestivum ✕
Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Defoliation caused a substantial decrease in wheat root density .
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Temporary growth cessation of wheat roots following defoliation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–63 e2 “This caused a substantial decrease in root density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–934 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
At low versus high sowing density , grain yield in modern wheat cultivars did not decrease significantly.
modern cultivars e0 low sowing density e0 did not decrease e0 high sowing density e0 Verbatim
e0 “Compared to high sowing density , in modern cultivars grain yield did not decrease significantly with low sowing density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1024 t0 “common wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–85 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
A third year without wheat gave no further wild oat density decrease .
a third year without wheat e0 additional decrease e0 no additional decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “wild oats in wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–33 e0 “a third year without wheat gave no additional decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–595 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The combined decrease in nitrogen recovery and in crease in planting density decrease d protein content, sedimentation value and wet gluten content of wheat.
combined decrease in nitrogen recovery and increase in planting density e0 protein content, sedimentation value and wet gluten content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t1 “Weak-Gluten Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 158–175 e0 “The combined decrease in nitrogen recovery and in crease in planting density decrease d protein content, sedimentation value and wet gluten content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2050–2195 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Moldboard tillage decrease d soil bulk density .
moldboard tillage e0 soil bulk density e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The use of moldboard tillage led to a decrease in soil bulk density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1224 e1 “winter wheat crop formation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–94 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
High population density postponed the decrease in in ferior tiller ethylene release.
high density populations e0 ethylene release e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “This process was postponed in high density populations. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 535–590 e1 “ethylene release of the in ferior tillers was higher than that of the superior ones and main stems before it decrease d in the jointing period ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 393–533 e2 “wheat growth and development stages ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–226 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
NANO-GRO decrease d bulk density in common wheat grain.
Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a decrease in bulk density in common wheat grain. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1321 t0 “NANO-GRO ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–139 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Weed management treatments decrease d weed density and dry weight.
all treatments e0 weed density and dry weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a substantial decrease in weed density and dry weight across all treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1105 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–96 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage tended to decrease total weed density and flixweed density early in wheat growth, but not significantly versus traditional tillage.
flixweed e0 weed total density of weeds and the density of dominant species flixweed e0 traditional tillage e0 Verbatim
e0 “No-tillage had a trend of decreasing the total density of weeds and the density of dominant species flixweed at the early stage of wheat growth,but the difference between traditional tillage and no-tillage was not significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 227–452 t0 “wheat field ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–43 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
High density significantly decrease d endogenous spermidine content.
endogenous spermidine (Spd) content e0 Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a significant decrease in endogenous spermidine (Spd) content in in ferior grains ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1261 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–26 Other claims from this paper (11) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivumt0
Avena