View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit decrease d leaf relative water content .
Outcomeleaf relative water content e0 Not reported Value
Verbatim
e0 “There was decrease in the leaf relative water content in plants under water deficit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–701 t0 “Glycine max cv. Sambaiba ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–75 t1 “control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–570 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Decreasing soil water potential during vegetative and flowering stages caused a higher decrease in relative water content in pigeon pea cv. ICPL-151 than in cv. H-77-216.
Organ / stagevegetative and flowering stages e1 TreatmentDecrease in soil water potential e1 Outcomerelative water content e1 Directionhigher decrease e1 Verbatim
t0 “Response of pigeon pea cultivars to water stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–48 e1 “Decrease in soil water potential during vegetative and flowering stages of two cultivars of pipeon pea (Cajanus cajari) caused higher decrease in relative water content in cv. ICPL-151 than in cv. H-77-216 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–205 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
H6 and Gharashani showed a smaller decrease in relative water content under salinity than sensitive genotypes.
MaterialH6 and Gharashani e0 Outcomerelative water content e0 Directionlower decrease e0 Comparatorsensitive ones (Shirazi and GhezelUzum) e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “H6 and Gharashani that showed lower decrease in water potential, leaf area, leaf growth rate and relative water content under salinity, were selected as tolerant genotypes compared to sensitive ones (Shirazi and GhezelUzum) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 317–540 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Under drought, in tact yam bean plants had a significant decrease in leaf- relative - water content .
Treatmentintact plants (I+D) e0 Outcomeleaf-relative-water content (LRWC) e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “yam bean (Pachyrhizus ahipa (Wedd.) Parodi) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–90 e0 “a significant decrease was observed in the in tact plants (I+D) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–648 e1 “leaf- relative - water content (LRWC) was maintained in the pruned plants (P+D), a significant decrease was observed in the in tact plants (I+D) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 508–648 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress decrease d relative water content and chlorophyll.
Outcomerelative water content, chlorophyll content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “there was a decrease in relative water content , chlorophyll content , antioxidant enzymes, protein, and mineral nutrient elements. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1475 t0 “peanut tolerance to water stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–68 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Calcium treatment reduced the decrease in relative water content of leaves under osmotic stress.
TaxonHemerocallis middendorfii t0 Treatmentcalcium treatment e2 Outcomerelative water content of leaves e1 Comparatorosmotic stress e1 Verbatim
t0 “Hemerocallis middendorfii under Osmotic Stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–137 e1 “under osmotic stress,the relative water content of leaves decrease d significantly ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–340 e2 “while the decrease reduced after calcium treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–391 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Salt stress similarly reduced leaf relative water content in both maize cultivars.
Outcomeleaf relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “salt stress caused a similar decrease in leaf relative water content in both maize cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1089 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought decrease d relative water content across all cultivars.
Treatmentdrought-treated e0 Outcomerelative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 e0 “a decrease in relative water content (RWC) and in crease of malondialdehyde content were observed in drought-treated plants of all cultivars. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–697 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect Drought lowered CO2 assimilation and transpiration rate across all cultivars. Observation Drought caused stomata closure across all cultivars. Intervention effect Drought increased malondialdehyde content across all cultivars. Observation The drought-related changes were most pronounced in Ellvis. Observation Soissons retained higher relative water content and CO2 assimilation under drought. Intervention effect Sugars, organic acids, amino acids and sugar alcohols accumulated to higher levels with drought than in controls. Association Several metabolites accumulated differently among genotypes under drought. Intervention effect Drought induced sucrose, malic and oxalic acids in four of six genotypes. Intervention effect Drought induced unknown organic acid 1 and unknown disaccharides 1, 2 and 3 in four of six genotypes. Intervention effect Drought induced GABA, L-threonine and glutamic acid in four of six genotypes. Observation Soissons accumulated the highest amount of unknown disaccharide 5, galactonic and phosphoric acids. Intervention effect Srpanjka increased glucose and fructose under drought. Observation Srpanjka accumulated unidentified sugar alcohols 1 and 2 under drought. Intervention effect In Ellvis, drought decreased Pn, gs and RWC. Intervention effect In Ellvis, drought decreased accumulation of sucrose, glucose and fructose. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Root cooling at +1°C in duced a decrease of about 2% in relative water content of the leaves.
Outcomerelative water content of the leaves e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “a treatment which in duced a decrease of about 2% in relative water content of the leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–373 e2 “kept with the roots at +1°C in nutrient solution and with the shoots in air at 20°C for 24 h ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–283 t0 “Water Flow in Wheat Seedlings after Small Water Deficits ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–56 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought-stressed Thymus pannonicus showed a significant decrease in relative water content compared with the control.
Treatmentdrought-stressed treatments e1 Outcomerelative water content e1 Verbatim
e0 “on Thymus pannonicus , a resilient perennial herb native to the Pannonian vegetation region ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 103–193 e1 “a notable decrease (p < 0.05) in relative water content was seen in drought-stressed treatments compared to the to the control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1028 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.