View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The model fits the available data well.
Comparatorthe available data e3 Verbatim
e3 “The model fits the available data well ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–424 Other claims from this paper (11) Method / resource observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Grouping by soil horizon worsened regression fits .
Comparatorsoil horizons e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “When root length distributions were grouped according to soil horizons the fits worsened ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1404 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The proposed model fits the experimental data well.
Comparatorthe experimental data e4 Verbatim
e4 “We propose a model that fits nicely the experimental data ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–491 Other claims from this paper (4) Method / resource author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Cubic spline methods gave apparently good fits to plant growth data.
Outcomegood fits to growth data e0 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “these may give apparently good fits to growth data ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–632 Other claims from this paper (1) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The intake prediction fits were at least as good as digestibility prediction fits .
Outcomefits of these relations e0 Directionat least as good as e0 Comparatorthose predicting organic matter digestibility e0 Verbatim
e0 “the fits of these relations were at least as good as those predicting organic matter digestibility ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1228 t0 “white clover ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 129–141 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Model fits were best for maize, then wheat and potato.
Comparatorwheat and potato e0 Verbatim
e0 “with the best model fits obtained for maize, followed by wheat and potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–842 Other claims from this paper (6) Method / resource observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Estimated flux improved Douglas-fir second flush growth fits over D50, with significant weight and leaf-area fits at final harvest in 1989.
Organ / stagesecond flush growth e0 Verbatim
e0 “with second flush growth of Douglas-fir, better fits were obtained with FLUXSUMC than D50, reaching significance for weight and leaf area at the final harvest in 1989. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 5283–5450 Other claims from this paper (19) Method / resource observed review summary mixed basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The logistic model fits many epidemics but neglects lesion clustering by contagion.
Outcomefits many epidemics e0 Qualifierneglects the clustering of lesions by contagion e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The more abstract logistic model fits many epidemics, although it neglects the clustering of lesions by contagion. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–240 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The circular model fits the landmarks of castor bean leaf shape.
Outcomefits the landmarks e1 Verbatim
t0 “Leaf shape simulation of castor bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–36 e1 “Based on validation results, the circular model fits the landmarks and nonrectangular hyperbolic model fits the lobe margins very well. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–726 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Different mathematical fits may quantify growth rate, duration and gating.
Outcomegrowth rate, growth duration and gating e0 Valuedifferent mathematical fits e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “different mathematical fits may help quantify growth rate, growth duration and gating. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1327 t0 “plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 45–51 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.