Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit decreased leaf relative water content.

Taxon: Glycine max cv. SambaibaGlycine maxt0
Treatment: water deficite0
Outcome: leaf relative water contente0
Direction: decreasee0
Comparator: controlt1

Not reportedValue

Verbatim

e0
“There was decrease in the leaf relative water content in plants under water deficit”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–701

t0
“Glycine max cv. Sambaiba”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–75

t1
“control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–570

Title

Physiological and biochemical behavior in soybean (Glycine max cv. Sambaiba) plants under water deficit.

Allan Klynger da Silva Lobato; Cândido Ferreira de Oliveira Neto; Benedito Gomes dos Santos Filho; et al. Australian Journal of Crop Science 2008

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Water deficit increased total soluble carbohydrates by 40%.
Intervention effect Water deficit increased sucrose by 205.0%.
Intervention effect Water deficit increased reducing carbohydrates by 19.2%.
Intervention effect Water deficit increased proline by 67%.
Intervention effect Water deficit increased free amino acids by 388.1%.
Intervention effect Two days of water stress significantly changed leaf water content and carbohydrate levels.
Intervention effect Proline did not change significantly until day four of water restriction.

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative water content decreased to a basal level after drought treatments.

Taxon: SOYBEANSGlycine maxt0
Treatment: drought treatmentse0
Outcome: relative water contente0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“the decrease in relative water content to a basal level in response to drought treatments was observed.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–821

t0
“SOYBEANS”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–56

Title

MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION AND RESPONSE OF FIVE SOYBEANS GENOTYPES TO PEG TREATMENT

M. H. El-Hadary; Shimaa S. El-Sherbini; Samar Omar Egyptian Journal of Genetics and Cytology 2018

Other claims from this paper (11)

Observation D89-89-40 was more adaptive to 15% PEG.
Observation Line 30 was more adaptive to 10% PEG.
Observation The two genotypes had highest proline content under water stress.
Observation The two genotypes had highest stress enzyme expression.
Observation Lipid peroxidation and electrolyte leakage decreased in the two genotypes.
Observation DHN2 expression increased in D89-89-40.
Observation DHN2 expression stayed steady in Line 30.
Observation DHN1 and CAB3 expression declined least in D89-89-40 and Line 30.
Observation Photosynthetic activity and pigment content decreased least in the two genotypes.
Recommendation The authors nominate D89-89-40 and Line 30 for wider cultivation.
Recommendation The authors propose DHN2 expression as a drought tolerance screening marker.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Above a relative-water-content threshold, a slight decline in water content sharply reduced stomatal conductance.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome: g se0
Direction: reductione0
Qualifier: above which a slight decrease in RWCe0

Not reportedOrgan / stage

Verbatim

e0
“a threshold of relative water content (RWC) was found, above which a slight decrease in RWC lead to a sharp reduction in g s”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–547

t0
“soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–62

Title

Photosynthetic response of salt-tolerant and sensitive soybean varieties

K. X. Lu; B. H. Cao; X. P. Feng; et al. Photosynthetica 2009. doi:10.1007/s11099-009-0059-7

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whole plant chilling decreased relative water content and increased proline over time.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: whole‐chilled plantse0
Outcome: RWCe0
Direction: decreasee0
Comparator: shoot‐chilled plantse0

Verbatim

e0
“Chill‐induced drought stress (decrease in RWC and increase in proline content) developed with time in whole‐chilled plants, but not in shoot‐chilled plants.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–949

t0
“soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–77

Title

Dark chilling increases glucose‐6‐phosphate dehydrogenase activity in soybean leaves

Philippus D. R. Van Heerden; Magdaleen F. De Villiers; Johannes Van Staden; et al. Physiologia Plantarum 2003. doi:10.1034/j.1399-3054.2003.00172.x

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Whole plant chilling increased proline content over time, unlike shoot chilling.
Intervention effect Whole plant chilling reduced carbon dioxide assimilation rate, unlike shoot chilling.
Intervention effect Whole plant chilling reduced FBPase activity, unlike shoot chilling.
Intervention effect Whole plant chilling reduced RuBP content, unlike shoot chilling.
Intervention effect Shoot chilling altered diurnal regulation of PSII activity.
Intervention effect Shoot chilling increased activation of NADP dependent malate dehydrogenase.
Mechanism Shoot chilling was interpreted to increase stromal redox state.
Intervention effect Both dark chilling treatments increased foliar G6PDH activity.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 0.1% NaCl, relative water content of the Vita soybean variety decreased by 5%, the smallest decrease among the varieties.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxt0
Material: Vitae2
Treatment: 0.1% NaCle1
Outcome: relative water contente3
Direction: decreasede3
Value: 5%e2
Qualifier: in the least degreee2
Comparator: 0 (control)e0

Verbatim

t0
“in the leaves of soybean (Glycine max)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–163

e0
“0 (control), 0.01%, 0.1% for 14 days”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–285

e1
“The length of the above-ground organsat a concentration of 0.1% NaCl in the Almaty variety decreased by 17%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–477

e2
“Vita variety, this indicator decreased in the least degree – by 5%”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1305

e3
“The relative water content (RWC) decreased in all varieties under the action of salinity”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1119–1206

Title

The effect of salinity (NaCl) on growth parameters and the relative water content, on the content of photosynthetic pigments in the leaves of soybean (Glycine max)

A.S. Nurmahanova; S. Uteshova; A. Domakbayeva; et al. Eurasian Journal of Ecology 2018. doi:10.26577/eje-2018-2-813

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, above-ground length of the Almaty soybean variety decreased by 17%.
Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, above-ground length of the Vita soybean variety decreased by 19%.
Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, above-ground length of the Lastochka soybean variety decreased by 28%.
Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, root length of the Lastochka soybean variety increased by 20%.
Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, root length of the Vita soybean variety increased by 14%.
Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, aerial dry biomass of the Vita soybean variety was reduced by 17%.
Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, aerial dry biomass of the Lastochka soybean variety was reduced by 24%.
Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, aerial dry biomass of the Almaty soybean variety was reduced by 24%.
Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, root dry mass of the Vita soybean variety increased by 32%.
Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, root dry mass of the Lastochka soybean variety decreased by 9%.
Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, root dry mass of the Almaty soybean variety decreased by 19%.
Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, relative water content of the Almaty soybean variety decreased by 8%.
Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, relative water content of the Lastochka soybean variety decreased by 15%.
Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, chlorophyll content of the Vita soybean variety decreased by 10%.
Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, chlorophyll content of the Almaty soybean variety decreased by 13%.
Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, chlorophyll content of the Lastochka soybean variety decreased by 14%.
Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, chlorophyll b content of the Vita soybean variety was 92% of control; the Lastochka (90%) and Almaty (89%) values are in the same sentence.
Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, carotenoid concentration of the Vita soybean variety increased by 21%.
Intervention effect At 0.1% NaCl, carotenoid concentration of the Almaty and Lastochka soybean varieties increased by 16%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf relative water content fell to 74.6% under 60% of field capacity irrigation, compared with 85.33% in the control.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: under water deficiency 60e1
Outcome: leaf relative water contente0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 74.6e1
Comparator: control plants (100% field capacity)e2

Verbatim

t0
“soybean (Glycine max merri.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–109

e0
“There was decrease in the leaf relative water content in plants under water deficit”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–755

e1
“treatment under water deficiency 60 and 50% of F.c had fall to 74.6 and 60.6%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–848

e2
“when compared with the control plants (100% field capacity) 85.33 %”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–917

Title

The effect of Water limitation on Water Relations, growth and seed yield of four soybean (Glycine max merri.) genotypes

Kamil M. Al; Abdurrahman Salim 2014

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Leaf relative water content fell to 60.6% under 50% of field capacity irrigation, compared with 85.33% in the control.
Intervention effect Osmotic potential increased to 0.716 under 60% of field capacity irrigation.
Intervention effect Osmotic potential increased to 0.647 under 50% of field capacity irrigation.
Association Genotype interacted significantly with water level for osmotic potential but not for relative water content.
Intervention effect Drought stress did not significantly affect Ca and K uptake in soybean.
Association Genotype Pi took up more K (466.2 m mole Kg-1) than the other genotypes.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced dry matter accumulation of soybean.
Intervention effect Water limitation reduced pods per plant and 1000-seed weight of soybean.
Intervention effect Seed yield per plant under limited irrigation was lower than under well-watering.
Association Lee had the highest dry matter (8.9 g).
Association Lee had the highest number of pods per plant (81.84).
Association Lee had the highest 1000-seed weight (15.2 g).
Mechanism The higher plant seed yield of Lee (2.613 g) is attributed to its higher pods per plant and 1000-seed weight.
Observation Genotype S consumed 1199.9 mm of water under irrigation.
Observation Genotype Lee consumed 1158.5 mm of water under irrigation.
Observation Genotype Pi consumed a low amount of water (876.5 mm).
Observation Genotype G consumed a low amount of water (892.7 mm).
Recommendation Genotypes Pi and G may be used in less moisture conditions.
Mechanism Osmotic adjustment may be the adaptive mechanism that lets soybean survive drought.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf relative water content fell to 60.6% under 50% of field capacity irrigation, compared with 85.33% in the control.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: under water deficiency 60 and 50% of F.ce1
Outcome: leaf relative water contente0
Direction: decreasee0
Value: 60.6%e1
Comparator: control plants (100% field capacity)e2

Verbatim

t0
“soybean (Glycine max merri.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–109

e0
“There was decrease in the leaf relative water content in plants under water deficit”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 672–755

e1
“treatment under water deficiency 60 and 50% of F.c had fall to 74.6 and 60.6%, respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–848

e2
“when compared with the control plants (100% field capacity) 85.33 %”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–917

Title

The effect of Water limitation on Water Relations, growth and seed yield of four soybean (Glycine max merri.) genotypes

Kamil M. Al; Abdurrahman Salim 2014

Other claims from this paper (19)

Intervention effect Leaf relative water content fell to 74.6% under 60% of field capacity irrigation, compared with 85.33% in the control.
Intervention effect Osmotic potential increased to 0.716 under 60% of field capacity irrigation.
Intervention effect Osmotic potential increased to 0.647 under 50% of field capacity irrigation.
Association Genotype interacted significantly with water level for osmotic potential but not for relative water content.
Intervention effect Drought stress did not significantly affect Ca and K uptake in soybean.
Association Genotype Pi took up more K (466.2 m mole Kg-1) than the other genotypes.
Intervention effect Water deficit reduced dry matter accumulation of soybean.
Intervention effect Water limitation reduced pods per plant and 1000-seed weight of soybean.
Intervention effect Seed yield per plant under limited irrigation was lower than under well-watering.
Association Lee had the highest dry matter (8.9 g).
Association Lee had the highest number of pods per plant (81.84).
Association Lee had the highest 1000-seed weight (15.2 g).
Mechanism The higher plant seed yield of Lee (2.613 g) is attributed to its higher pods per plant and 1000-seed weight.
Observation Genotype S consumed 1199.9 mm of water under irrigation.
Observation Genotype Lee consumed 1158.5 mm of water under irrigation.
Observation Genotype Pi consumed a low amount of water (876.5 mm).
Observation Genotype G consumed a low amount of water (892.7 mm).
Recommendation Genotypes Pi and G may be used in less moisture conditions.
Mechanism Osmotic adjustment may be the adaptive mechanism that lets soybean survive drought.

Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf SOD activity first increased then decreased as soil water content declined.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe0
Organ / stage: leavese0
Outcome: SOD activity of soybean leavese0
Direction: first increased and then decreasede0
Setting: soil relative water contente0

Verbatim

e0
“The results showed that the SOD activity of soybean leaves first increased and then decreased with a decrease in soil relative water content”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–672

Title

Relationship Between Soil Moisture Content and Superoxide Dismutase Activity in Soybean Leaves in Northeast China

Xiyue Wang; Junxue Jiang; Zihao Wu; et al. Journal of Biobased Materials and Bioenergy 2021. doi:10.1166/jbmb.2021.2148

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought and P deficit negatively affected leaf area, relative chlorophyll content and stomatal conductance of both soybean cultivars

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment: P and water deficitse1
Outcome: leaf area, relative chlorophyll content and, to a higher extent, stomatal conductancee1
Direction: decreaseinferrede1
Setting: Debrecen, Hungarye0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“in Debrecen, Hungary to investigate the sole and combined effects of P fertilization and drought stress on two soybean cultivars”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–568

e1
“leaf area, relative chlorophyll content and, to a higher extent, stomatal conductance and plant height of both cultivars were negatively affected by both P and water deficits”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–764

Title

Sole and combined effects of drought and phosphorus application on soybean

Oqba Basal; András Szabó Journal of Central European Agriculture 2020. doi:10.5513/jcea01/21.4.2771

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Drought and P deficit negatively affected plant height of both soybean cultivars
Intervention effect Drought and lack of P decreased pod number per plant and seed yield
Intervention effect Drought stress decreased oil concentration in the seeds
Intervention effect P application significantly increased oil concentration in the seeds
Intervention effect P application did not measurably affect protein concentration in the seeds
Intervention effect Drought stress increased protein concentration in the seeds
Intervention effect The high P fertilizer rate had no noticeable effect compared with the lower rate
Recommendation The high rate of P fertilizer is not recommended in the study area

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotype BD2333 had the largest decrease in stomatal conductance (90.50%) under drought compared with control conditions.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxt1
Material: BD2333e1
Treatment: droughte1
Outcome: gse1
Direction: largest decreasee1
Value: 90.50%e1
Comparator: control conditionse1

Verbatim

t1
“Soybean Genotypes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–51

e1
“BD2333 exhibited the largest decrease in plant height (37.10%), pod number plant−1 (85.90%), SP (56.20%), HSW (54.20%), gs (90.50%), Pn (71.00%), transpiration rate (59.40%), relative water content (34.40%), Chl a (79.50%), total Chls (72.70%), and carotenoids (56.70%), along with the maximum increase in water saturation deficit (290.40%) and malondialdehyde content (280.30%) under drought compared to control conditi…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1868–2291

Title

Differential Drought Responses of Soybean Genotypes in Relation to Photosynthesis and Growth-Yield Attributes

Md. Saddam Hossain; Md. Arifur Rahman Khan; Apple Mahmud; et al. Plants 2024. doi:10.3390/plants13192765

Other claims from this paper (19)

“decrease in relative water content”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics