View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Zea mays ✕
Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Chemical weeding reduced weed dry weight 4.2 ... 6.9 times with fertilization.
Treatmentchemical weeding e0 Outcomedry weight of weeds e0 Qualifierwith fertilization e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “MAIZE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–37 e0 “A significant decrease in the dry weight of weeds was established due to chemical weeding: against an unfertilized background by 7.9 ... 9.1 times, with fertilization - by 4.2 ... 6.9 times ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1456 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
With increasing seed production density, root length, seed dry weight and germination indexes of Ph6 wc first increased and then decrease d.
Treatmentincreasing of density e1 OutcomeRoot length,seed dry weight,germination indexes e0 Directiondecrease after the first increase e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 e0 “Ph6 wc Root length,seed dry weight ,germination indexes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–522 e1 “with increasing of density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–347 e2 “all showed a trend of decrease after the first increase ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–578 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Under low temperature, exogenous DA-6 reduced the shoot and root fresh and dry weight decrease to 5.81%~13.57%.
Organ / stageshoot and root e2 Outcomeshoot and root fresh weight and dry weight e2 Verbatim
e0 “Spring maize sowing occurs during a period of low temperature (LT) in Northeast China ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 e2 “The shoot and root fresh weight and dry weight decrease d by 17.70%~20.82% in the LT treatment, and decrease d by 5.81%~13.57% in the LT + DA-6 treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–483 Other claims from this paper (9) Mechanism observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Low photosynthesis rates hampered maize dry weight accumulation, which decrease d by 8.00% -74.43%.
Outcomeaccumulation of plant dry weight e0 Qualifierlow of photosynthesis rates e0 Verbatim
e0 “The low of photosynthesis rates resulted in the accumulation of plant dry weight was hampered, and there was a decrease of 8.00% -74.43%. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1434 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–126 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Untreated grain had a larger dry weight loss than treated grain.
Treatmentdiatomaceous earth e0 OutcomeDry weight decrease e0 Directionmore pronounced e0 Comparatorthose grains that have not received the application of diatomaceous earth e0 Verbatim
t0 “CORN ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–70 e0 “Dry weight decrease was observed in all doses and storage temperatures evaluated, but it was more pronounced in those grains that have not received the application of diatomaceous earth. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1245 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Maize plants without water supply had grain dry weight decrease d by 36 % compared with plants given three-time water application.
Treatmentwithout water supply e0 Outcomedry weight of the grains e0 Comparatorplants with three-time water application e0 Verbatim
e0 “Plants without water supply showed a decrease in the dry weight of the grains as much as 36 % compared to the plants with three-time water application ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1089 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Low light stress at flowering stage decrease d daily weight gain of aboveground total dry matter in maize.
Treatmentlow light stress at flowering stage e1 Outcomedaily weight gain of aboveground total dry matter e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Kernel Number per Ear of Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–79 e1 “It was found that low light stress at flowering stage led to the decrease in daily weight gain of aboveground total dry matter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–603 Other claims from this paper (11) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Each additional 100 g/m2 of weed dry weight was associated with 98.2 kg/ha lower grain yield.
Qualifier100 g/m2 of additional weed dry weight e0 Verbatim
e0 “Per 100 g/m2 of additional weed dry weight , there was a grain yield decrease of 98.2 kg/ha ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–801 t0 “grain corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–103 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Vegetative and root dry weight decrease d significantly as salinity increased, except in the second treatment.
Treatmentwater Salinity e1 Outcomedry weight of the vegetative and roots e1 Qualifierexcept the Second treatment e1 Verbatim
e0 “corn (Zeamays L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 142–159 e1 “Significant decrease in the plant Length , dry weight of the vegetative and roots with increase of water Salinity For each treatment except the Second treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–855 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit decrease d maize growth and yield by approximately 25%, including height, cob length, root dry weight , grains per cob and 100-grain weight .
TreatmentWater deficit stress e0 Outcomegrowth and yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Water deficit stress caused a significant decrease (by approximately 25%) in growth and yield of both maize varieties by decreasing plant height, cob length, dry root weight , grains per cob and 100-grain weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–652 t0 “Maize (Zea mays L) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–77 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.