Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“nitrogen use efficiency”

1,915 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

1960 ’70 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield at 60% of control irrigation did not differ significantly from the full-irrigation control.

Taxon: sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment: 60% of the controle1
Outcome: seeds yielde1
Direction: no significant differencese1
Comparator: control treatmente1

Verbatim

e0
“water use efficiency of sunflower (Helianthus annus L. )”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–381

e1
“there is no significant differences between the control treatment and 60% of the control for the period from planting to 50% flowering, number of leaves, relative water content, nitrogen concentration in leaves, fertilization percentage, number of seeds in the head,100 seed weight and seeds yield reaching 3.90, 2.46 t.ha-1 and 3.78 , 2.41 t.ha-1 for spring and autumn seasons respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–1147

Title

ROLE OF PROLINE ACID IN IMPROVING SUNFLOWER YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS UNDER DEFICIT CONDITIONS WATER

Abass & Alag IRAQI JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES 2016. doi:10.36103/ijas.v47i2.586

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Number of leaves, relative water content and leaf nitrogen concentration at 60% of control irrigation did not differ significantly from control.
Intervention effect Fertilization percentage, seed number per head and 100-seed weight at 60% of control irrigation did not differ significantly from control.
Intervention effect Period from planting to 50% flowering at 60% of control irrigation did not differ significantly from control.
Observation Saving 40% of irrigation water would be possible, about 1920 and 2960 m3 per ha, without yield reduction.
Intervention effect Seed yield at 50% irrigation fell by 14.61% in spring relative to control.
Intervention effect Seed yield at 40% irrigation fell by 19.74% in spring relative to control.
Intervention effect Seed yield at 50% irrigation fell by 21.95% in autumn relative to control.
Intervention effect Seed yield at 40% irrigation fell by 33.33% in autumn relative to control.
Intervention effect Irrigation at 40% and at 60% of control gave the best water use efficiency in both seasons.
Association Proline acid concentration significantly affected most of the studied sunflower traits.
Intervention effect Proline acid at 60 mg/L increased sunflower fertilization percentage compared with control.
Intervention effect Proline acid at 60 mg/L increased sunflower seed yield to 3.75 and 2.21 t/ha compared with control.
Intervention effect Proline acid at 60 mg/L increased 100-seed weight, reported as 7.12 g.
Intervention effect Proline acid at 60 mg/L increased water use efficiency, reported as 0.84 kg seed per m3 water.
Association The interaction of irrigation and proline acid significantly affected all seed yield component traits in both seasons.
Recommendation Under limited irrigation, full irrigation at 50% depletion of available water avoids a significant decrease in seed yield; authors recommend it.
Recommendation Treating sunflower with proline acid at 60 mg/L is recommended to improve capacity against water stress.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N additions did not affect canopy leaf biomass or leaf area index.

Taxon: sugar mapleAcer saccharumt0
Treatment: NO3(-) additionse1
Outcome: canopy leaf biomass or leaf area indexe0
Direction: have not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“have not affected canopy leaf biomass or leaf area index.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–647

t0
“sugar maple”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–89

e1
“The NO3(-) additions significantly increased foliar N. However, there was no significant difference between the ambient and +NO3(-) treatments in two seasons (2006-2007) of instantaneous measurements of photosynthesis from either canopy towers or excised branches. In measurements on excised branches, photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency (micromol CO2 s(-1) g(-1) N) was significantly decreased (-13%) by NO3(-) addit…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1607

Title

No evidence that chronic nitrogen additions increase photosynthesis in mature sugar maple forests

A. F. Talhelm; K. S. Pregitzer; A. J. Burton Ecological Applications 2011. doi:10.1890/10-2076.1

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect N additions increased aboveground growth.
Intervention effect Nitrate additions significantly increased foliar N.
Intervention effect Photosynthesis did not differ significantly between ambient and nitrate treatments.
Intervention effect Nitrate reduced photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency by 13%.
Intervention effect No consistent nitrate effect was detected in foliage or litter isotope measures.
Intervention effect Nitrate affected individual leaf area and mass, varying by site.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Period from planting to 50% flowering at 60% of control irrigation did not differ significantly from control.

Taxon: sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment: 60% of the controle1
Outcome: period from planting to 50% floweringe1
Direction: no significant differencese1
Comparator: control treatmente1

Verbatim

e0
“water use efficiency of sunflower (Helianthus annus L. )”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–381

e1
“there is no significant differences between the control treatment and 60% of the control for the period from planting to 50% flowering, number of leaves, relative water content, nitrogen concentration in leaves, fertilization percentage, number of seeds in the head,100 seed weight and seeds yield reaching 3.90, 2.46 t.ha-1 and 3.78 , 2.41 t.ha-1 for spring and autumn seasons respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–1147

Title

ROLE OF PROLINE ACID IN IMPROVING SUNFLOWER YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS UNDER DEFICIT CONDITIONS WATER

Abass & Alag IRAQI JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES 2016. doi:10.36103/ijas.v47i2.586

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Seed yield at 60% of control irrigation did not differ significantly from the full-irrigation control.
Intervention effect Number of leaves, relative water content and leaf nitrogen concentration at 60% of control irrigation did not differ significantly from control.
Intervention effect Fertilization percentage, seed number per head and 100-seed weight at 60% of control irrigation did not differ significantly from control.
Observation Saving 40% of irrigation water would be possible, about 1920 and 2960 m3 per ha, without yield reduction.
Intervention effect Seed yield at 50% irrigation fell by 14.61% in spring relative to control.
Intervention effect Seed yield at 40% irrigation fell by 19.74% in spring relative to control.
Intervention effect Seed yield at 50% irrigation fell by 21.95% in autumn relative to control.
Intervention effect Seed yield at 40% irrigation fell by 33.33% in autumn relative to control.
Intervention effect Irrigation at 40% and at 60% of control gave the best water use efficiency in both seasons.
Association Proline acid concentration significantly affected most of the studied sunflower traits.
Intervention effect Proline acid at 60 mg/L increased sunflower fertilization percentage compared with control.
Intervention effect Proline acid at 60 mg/L increased sunflower seed yield to 3.75 and 2.21 t/ha compared with control.
Intervention effect Proline acid at 60 mg/L increased 100-seed weight, reported as 7.12 g.
Intervention effect Proline acid at 60 mg/L increased water use efficiency, reported as 0.84 kg seed per m3 water.
Association The interaction of irrigation and proline acid significantly affected all seed yield component traits in both seasons.
Recommendation Under limited irrigation, full irrigation at 50% depletion of available water avoids a significant decrease in seed yield; authors recommend it.
Recommendation Treating sunflower with proline acid at 60 mg/L is recommended to improve capacity against water stress.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 50% lower CRF and SCF application, summer maize yield differed less from that under CCF application.

Taxon: summer maizeZea mayse1
Treatment: applied amount of CRF and SCF was decreased by 50%e3
Outcome: yielde3
Direction: less differencee3
Comparator: CCF applicatione3
Setting: field experimente1

Verbatim

e1
“A field experiment with colophony-coated fertilizer (CRF) and sulfur-coated fertilizer (SCF) showed that under the same application rates of N, P and K, applying CRF and SCF increased the summer maize grain yield by 13.15% and 14.15%, respectively, compared to the application of common compound fertilizer CCF”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–310

e3
“when the applied amount of CRF and SCF was decreased by 50%, the yield had less difference with that under CCF application”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 433–555

Title

[Effects of controlled-release fertilizers on summer maize grain yield, field ammonia volatilization, and fertilizer nitrogen use efficiency].

Bin Zhao; Shu-Ting Dong; Kong-Jun Wang; et al. PubMed 2009

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Colophony-coated fertilizer (CRF) increased summer maize grain yield by 13.15% compared with common compound fertilizer (CCF).
Intervention effect Sulfur-coated fertilizer (SCF) increased summer maize grain yield by 14.15% compared with common compound fertilizer (CCF).
Intervention effect At 25% lower CRF application, summer maize yield increased by 9.69%.
Intervention effect At 25% lower SCF application, summer maize yield increased by 10.04%.
Intervention effect Ammonia volatilization rate under CRF and SCF increased slowly compared with CCF.
Intervention effect The ammonia volatilization peak under CRF and SCF came 7 days later than under CCF.
Observation Total ammonia volatilization under CRF and SCF ranged from 0.78 to 4.43 kg N x hm(-2).
Intervention effect Total ammonia volatilization under CRF and SCF was 51.34%-91.34% lower than under CCF.
Intervention effect Fertilizer and agronomic nitrogen use efficiency under CRF and SCF were significantly higher than under CCF.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Proportions of soil aggregates larger than 2 mm or smaller than 0.053 mm did not differ among the treatment groups.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae1
Treatment: combination of organic and inorganic fertilizerse1
Outcome: proportions of soil aggregates larger than 2 mm or smaller than 0.053 mme3
Direction: no_changeinferrede3
Comparator: among the treatment groupse3

Verbatim

e1
“The results revealed that the combination of organic and inorganic fertilizers significantly increased rice yields and nitrogen use efficiency, with the T3 treatment performing the best”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–905

e3
“There were no significant differences among the treatment groups in terms of the proportions of soil aggregates larger than 2 mm or smaller than 0.053 mm”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1184

Title

Long-Term Effects of the Combined Application of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on Soil Fertility, Structural Stability, and Rice Productivity in Cool Rice-Growing Regions of Northeast China

Yuwei Xin; Benqi Yue; Xin Zhao; et al. Plants 2026. doi:10.3390/plants15070993

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Combining organic and inorganic fertilizers significantly increased rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency, with T3 performing best.
Intervention effect T3 gave a 24.26% greater rice yield than CK.
Intervention effect T3 increased nitrogen agronomic efficiency by 71.05% compared with CK.
Intervention effect Different organic–inorganic combinations did not change soil aggregate structure or stability.
Intervention effect Nitrogen fertilizer application reduced the proportion of 0.053–0.25 mm soil aggregates.
Intervention effect Nitrogen fertilizer application promoted the formation of predominantly 0.25–2 mm soil aggregates.
Intervention effect Combined organic and inorganic fertilizer application increased soil organic matter content compared with CK.
Intervention effect Combined organic and inorganic fertilizer application decreased N2O emissions compared with CK.
Intervention effect Combined organic and inorganic fertilizer application increased soil catalase activity compared with CK.
Recommendation The 50% organic N and 50% chemical N combination with conventional PK fertilizer (T3) is the optimal combination for high and stable rice yields.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lint yield under the irrigation treatments was statistically at par with protective irrigation.

Taxon: Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Material: RCH 2e7
Treatment: irrigation at 0.6 IW/CPE, 0.8 IW/CPE, 1.0 IW/CPEe1
Outcome: lint yielde2
Direction: statistically at pare2
Value: 700-772 kg/hae2
Comparator: protective irrigatione1
Setting: Coimabtoree0

Verbatim

t0
“Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–129

e0
“A field experiment was conducted during 2006-08 in a mixed red and black calcareous soil at Coimabtore”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–102

e1
“irrigation levels (protective irrigation and irrigation at 0.6 IW/CPE, 0.8 IW/CPE, 1.0 IW/CPE) and N levels (control, 60 kg N/ha, 90 kg N/ha and 120 kg N/ha)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–283

e2
“It was observed that the seed cotton (1 980-2 160 kg/ha) and lint yield (700-772 kg/ha) under different irrigation treatments were statistically at par with the protective irrigation but increased significantly due to nitrogen application”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–663

e7
“'RCH 2' Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–390

Title

Effect of irrigation and nitrogen on soil water dynamics, productivity and input-use efficiency of Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) in a Vertic Ustropept.

K. K. Bandyopadhyay; A. H. Prakash; K. Sankaranarayanan; et al. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2009

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Seed cotton yield under the irrigation treatments was statistically at par with protective irrigation.
Intervention effect Seed cotton yield increased significantly with nitrogen application.
Intervention effect Lint yield increased significantly with nitrogen application.
Intervention effect Seed cotton and lint yield did not differ significantly among 60, 90 and 120 kg N/ha.
Intervention effect Water-use efficiency of cotton was significantly reduced with increasing irrigation level.
Intervention effect Nitrogen application increased water-use efficiency over the no-nitrogen control.
Intervention effect Water-use efficiency did not differ significantly among 60, 90 and 120 kg N/ha.
Intervention effect Partial factor productivity of nitrogen decreased significantly with increasing irrigation and nitrogen levels.
Recommendation The authors recommend growing the RCH2Bt cotton hybrid with protective irrigation and 60 kg N/ha for higher water- and nitrogen-use efficiency without significant yield reduction.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization percentage, seed number per head and 100-seed weight at 60% of control irrigation did not differ significantly from control.

Taxon: sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment: 60% of the controle1
Outcome: fertilization percentage, number of seeds in the head,100 seed weighte1
Direction: no significant differencese1
Comparator: control treatmente1

Verbatim

e0
“water use efficiency of sunflower (Helianthus annus L. )”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–381

e1
“there is no significant differences between the control treatment and 60% of the control for the period from planting to 50% flowering, number of leaves, relative water content, nitrogen concentration in leaves, fertilization percentage, number of seeds in the head,100 seed weight and seeds yield reaching 3.90, 2.46 t.ha-1 and 3.78 , 2.41 t.ha-1 for spring and autumn seasons respectively”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–1147

Title

ROLE OF PROLINE ACID IN IMPROVING SUNFLOWER YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS UNDER DEFICIT CONDITIONS WATER

Abass & Alag IRAQI JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES 2016. doi:10.36103/ijas.v47i2.586

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Seed yield at 60% of control irrigation did not differ significantly from the full-irrigation control.
Intervention effect Number of leaves, relative water content and leaf nitrogen concentration at 60% of control irrigation did not differ significantly from control.
Intervention effect Period from planting to 50% flowering at 60% of control irrigation did not differ significantly from control.
Observation Saving 40% of irrigation water would be possible, about 1920 and 2960 m3 per ha, without yield reduction.
Intervention effect Seed yield at 50% irrigation fell by 14.61% in spring relative to control.
Intervention effect Seed yield at 40% irrigation fell by 19.74% in spring relative to control.
Intervention effect Seed yield at 50% irrigation fell by 21.95% in autumn relative to control.
Intervention effect Seed yield at 40% irrigation fell by 33.33% in autumn relative to control.
Intervention effect Irrigation at 40% and at 60% of control gave the best water use efficiency in both seasons.
Association Proline acid concentration significantly affected most of the studied sunflower traits.
Intervention effect Proline acid at 60 mg/L increased sunflower fertilization percentage compared with control.
Intervention effect Proline acid at 60 mg/L increased sunflower seed yield to 3.75 and 2.21 t/ha compared with control.
Intervention effect Proline acid at 60 mg/L increased 100-seed weight, reported as 7.12 g.
Intervention effect Proline acid at 60 mg/L increased water use efficiency, reported as 0.84 kg seed per m3 water.
Association The interaction of irrigation and proline acid significantly affected all seed yield component traits in both seasons.
Recommendation Under limited irrigation, full irrigation at 50% depletion of available water avoids a significant decrease in seed yield; authors recommend it.
Recommendation Treating sunflower with proline acid at 60 mg/L is recommended to improve capacity against water stress.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato yield under CF100, VC100 and VC50 + CF50 was statistically at par among these optimal-dose treatments.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicume1
Treatment: CF100, VC100 and VC50 + CF50e1
Outcome: yielde1
Direction: statistically at pare1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Field experiments were conducted to study the effect of organic and conventional fertilizer sources on growth, yield, and nitrogen use efficiency of tomato and sweet corn crop and on changes in chemical and biological properties in acid lateritic soil of eastern India”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 146–414

e1
“The treatments with optimal dose of fertilizer application i.e. CF100, VC100 and VC50 + CF50 were statistically at par and they were significantly superior to suboptimal dose of VC with other organic sources, in increasing yield of both tomato and sweet corn”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1188

Title

Comparative assessment of conventional and organic nutrient management on crop growth and yield and soil fertility in tomato-sweet corn production system

Kanu Murmu; Dillip Kumar Swain; Bijoy Chandra Ghosh Australian Journal of Crop Science 2013

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect CF100, VC100 and VC50 + CF50 significantly increased tomato yield compared with suboptimal VC with other organic sources.
Intervention effect CF100, VC100 and VC50 + CF50 significantly increased sweet corn yield compared with suboptimal VC with other organic sources.
Intervention effect Sweet corn yield under CF100, VC100 and VC50 + CF50 was statistically at par among these optimal-dose treatments.
Intervention effect Maximum N uptake among fertilized treatments was in the CF100 treatment.
Intervention effect Maximum N use efficiency among fertilized treatments was in the VC-based treatments.
Intervention effect VC-based treatments lowered soil available macronutrients (N, P and K) compared with CF treatment.
Intervention effect VC-based treatments raised soil organic carbon compared with CF treatment.
Intervention effect VC-based treatments raised soil micronutrients (Fe, Mn, Zn and Cu) compared with CF treatment.
Intervention effect Adding BF to VC-based treatment increased the microbial count three-fold compared with CF treatment.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced and postponed N application did not decrease yield.

Taxon: summer maizeZea mayst0
Treatment: reducing and postponing N applicatione0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: not decreasede0
Comparator: farmers' practicee1

Verbatim

e0
“The results show that N accumulation rate is increased under the reducing and postponing N application(N 168 kg/ha,1/5 basal,3/5 topdressing at stalk enlongation stage and 1/5 topdressing at silking stage,respectively) compared with farmers' practice(N 240 kg/ha,1/3 basal and 2/3 topdressing at booting stage,respectively),while N use efficiency,dry biomass accumulation,yield and N accumulation amount are not decrease…” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 159–581

t0
“summer maize”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 107–119

e1
“compared with farmers' practice(N 240 kg/ha,1/3 basal and 2/3 topdressing at booting stage,respectively)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 378–482

Title

Effects of reducing and postponing nitrogen application on soil N supply,plant N uptake and utilization of summer maize

Jiyun Jin Plant Nutrition and Fertilizing Science 2010

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Reduced and postponed N application increased maize N accumulation rate over farmers practice.
Intervention effect Reduced and postponed N application did not decrease N use efficiency.
Intervention effect Reduced and postponed N application did not decrease dry biomass accumulation.
Intervention effect Reduced and postponed N application did not decrease N accumulation amount.
Intervention effect The treatment improved synchronization of soil N supply and maize demand.
Intervention effect The treatment decreased nitrate N accumulation in the 0-100 cm soil profile.
Intervention effect The treatment reduced apparent field N loss at maturity.
Recommendation Reduced and postponed N application is recommended as feasible and could save 30% N fertilizer versus farmers practice.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed cotton yield under the irrigation treatments was statistically at par with protective irrigation.

Taxon: Gossypium hirsutumGossypium hirsutumt0
Material: RCH 2e7
Treatment: irrigation at 0.6 IW/CPE, 0.8 IW/CPE, 1.0 IW/CPEe1
Outcome: seed cottone2
Direction: statistically at pare2
Value: 1 980-2 160 kg/hae2
Comparator: protective irrigatione1
Setting: Coimabtoree0

Verbatim

t0
“Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–129

e0
“A field experiment was conducted during 2006-08 in a mixed red and black calcareous soil at Coimabtore”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–102

e1
“irrigation levels (protective irrigation and irrigation at 0.6 IW/CPE, 0.8 IW/CPE, 1.0 IW/CPE) and N levels (control, 60 kg N/ha, 90 kg N/ha and 120 kg N/ha)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 126–283

e2
“It was observed that the seed cotton (1 980-2 160 kg/ha) and lint yield (700-772 kg/ha) under different irrigation treatments were statistically at par with the protective irrigation but increased significantly due to nitrogen application”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–663

e7
“'RCH 2' Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 349–390

Title

Effect of irrigation and nitrogen on soil water dynamics, productivity and input-use efficiency of Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) in a Vertic Ustropept.

K. K. Bandyopadhyay; A. H. Prakash; K. Sankaranarayanan; et al. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2009

Other claims from this paper (9)

Intervention effect Lint yield under the irrigation treatments was statistically at par with protective irrigation.
Intervention effect Seed cotton yield increased significantly with nitrogen application.
Intervention effect Lint yield increased significantly with nitrogen application.
Intervention effect Seed cotton and lint yield did not differ significantly among 60, 90 and 120 kg N/ha.
Intervention effect Water-use efficiency of cotton was significantly reduced with increasing irrigation level.
Intervention effect Nitrogen application increased water-use efficiency over the no-nitrogen control.
Intervention effect Water-use efficiency did not differ significantly among 60, 90 and 120 kg N/ha.
Intervention effect Partial factor productivity of nitrogen decreased significantly with increasing irrigation and nitrogen levels.
Recommendation The authors recommend growing the RCH2Bt cotton hybrid with protective irrigation and 60 kg N/ha for higher water- and nitrogen-use efficiency without significant yield reduction.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“nitrogen use efficiency”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics