Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“decrease of soybean injury”

69 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 4 non-evaluative

Over time

1950 ’60 ’70 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

Refine

More filters

Organism names are matched through NCBI Taxonomy: “soybean” → Glycine max. Claims whose organism was placed there count as matches whatever the abstract calls it (maize, corn, Zea mays).

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazapyr did not increase soybean injury with the other herbicides.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment: Imazapyre0
Outcome: soybean injurye0
Direction: did not increasee0
Comparator: chlorimuron, imazaquin, or imazethapyre0

Verbatim

e0
“Imazapyr did not increase soybean injury or decrease yield provided by chlorimuron, imazaquin, or imazethapyr.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1104

Title

Influence of Imazapyr on the Control of Pitted Morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) and Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) with Chlorimuron, Imazaquin, and Imazethapyr

Dennis G. Riley; David R. Shaw Weed Science 1988. doi:10.1017/s0043174500075585

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Imazapyr alone at up to 4 g ai/ha gave little or no johnsongrass control.
Intervention effect Imazapyr alone at up to 4 g ai/ha gave little or no pitted morningglory control.
Intervention effect Adding imazapyr to imazethapyr or imazaquin synergistically increased johnsongrass control after eight weeks.
Intervention effect Adding imazapyr to imazethapyr or imazaquin synergistically increased pitted morningglory control after eight weeks.
Observation Enhancing johnsongrass control required higher imazethapyr or imazaquin rates than enhancing pitted morningglory control.
Intervention effect Imazapyr mixed with chlorimuron showed no synergistic increase in johnsongrass control.
Intervention effect Imazapyr mixed with chlorimuron showed no synergistic increase in pitted morningglory control.
Intervention effect Imazapyr mixtures controlled johnsongrass at least as well as the next higher herbicide-alone rate.
Intervention effect Imazapyr mixtures controlled pitted morningglory at least as well as the next higher herbicide-alone rate.
Intervention effect Imazapyr did not decrease soybean yield with the other herbicides.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High cutting, crushing, harvest injury and processing violations contribute to crop losses and lower grain and seed quality.

Taxon: soybeansGlycine maxt0
Treatment: a high cut of the harvester's headere0
Outcome: losses and a decrease in the quality of commercial grain and seedse0
Direction: decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“a high cut of the harvester's header, significant crushing and injury during harvesting, and violation of the post-harvest processing technology lead to losses and a decrease in the quality of commercial grain and seeds.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 98–318

t0
“soybeans”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–75

Title

Ways to improve cleaning technology and post-harvest processing of soybeans

Marina Evgenievna Belyshkina; Ivan Alexandrovich Starostin; Mikhail Gennadevich Zagoruyko The Agrarian Scientific Journal 2020. doi:10.28983/asj.y2020i8pp4-9

Other claims from this paper (5)

Observation Soybean crop losses can reach 25–30%.
Recommendation Hybrid or rotary threshing combines are recommended to minimize harvesting losses.
Observation Flexible cutting reapers provide a 2.5 cm cut height.
Recommendation Immediate cleaning and drying commercial grain to 7–12% humidity at no more than 60°C is recommended.
Recommendation Immediate cleaning and drying seeds to 14% humidity at 35–40°C is recommended.

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean showed no visual injury under the tested herbicide treatments.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome: visual injurye0
Direction: noe0

Verbatim

e0
“There was no visual injury in soybean and no significant decrease in production and germination.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1285

Title

Chemical Management of Bidens pilosa (L.) and Euphorbia heterophylla (L.) and Seed Germination in Genetically Modified Soybean Glyphosate Tolerant

André Luiz de Souza Lacerda; Edgar Gomes Ferreira de Beauclair; João Nicanildo Bastos dos Santos American Journal of BioScience 2019. doi:10.11648/j.ajbio.20190705.11

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Glyphosate controlled Bidens pilosa above 90%.
Intervention effect Glyphosate controlled Euphorbia heterophylla above 90%.
Observation Soybean production showed no significant decrease.
Observation Soybean germination showed no significant decrease.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Injury did not change ascorbate peroxidase activity in susceptible soybean.

Taxon: SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Material: susceptible varietye0
Treatment: injurye0
Interactor: Brown Stink Bug Euschistus herosEuschistus herost0
Outcome: ascorbate peroxidasee0
Direction: no changee0

Not reportedInteractor roleComparator

Verbatim

e0
“In the susceptible variety, injury caused an increase in the activities of lipoxygenase 3 and guaiacol peroxidase, no change in ascorbate peroxidase, and a decrease in catalase.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–671

t0
“Soybean Response to Herbivory Injury by the Brown Stink Bug Euschistus heros (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–129

Title

Biochemical Aspects of the Soybean Response to Herbivory Injury by the Brown Stink Bug Euschistus heros (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)

Renata Velozo Timbó; Marcelo Hermes-Lima; Luciano Paulino Silva; et al. PLoS ONE 2014. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0109735

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Injury increased lipoxygenase 3 and guaiacol peroxidase activity in susceptible soybean.
Intervention effect Injury decreased catalase activity in susceptible soybean.
Intervention effect Injury did not alter monitored enzyme activities in resistant soybean.
Observation Both soybean varieties had 4-5% differential protein expression after 24 hours of injury.
Observation Differential proteins in the susceptible variety were related to stress, defense, and fungal infection.
Observation Protein-profile changes in the resistant variety were related to Calvin cycle enzymes.
Observation Authors interpret susceptible soybean as adapting redox metabolism and stress protein expression after injury.
Observation Authors interpret resistant soybean as mounting a defense response to the herbivore.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold stress decreased activities of both soybean lipoxygenase isoenzymes.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment: Cold stresse0
Outcome: specific activities of both isoenzymese0
Direction: decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Cold stress led to a decrease of the specific activities of both isoenzymes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–233

t0
“soybean”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–46

Title

Thermal injury and ozone stress affect soybean lipoxygenases expression

Mauro Maccarrone; Gerrit A. Veldink; Johannes F.G. Vliegenthart FEBS Letters 1992. doi:10.1016/0014-5793(92)80778-f

Other claims from this paper (5)

Mechanism Cold stress downregulated lipoxygenase expression at the translational level.
Intervention effect Heat shock enhanced lipoxygenase activities.
Intervention effect Ozone treatment enhanced lipoxygenase activities.
Mechanism Heat shock and ozone acted at the transcriptional level.
Mechanism The authors propose LOX-1 and LOX-2 involvement in thermotolerance and ozone-related early aging.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Injury increased lipoxygenase 3 and guaiacol peroxidase activity in susceptible soybean.

Taxon: SoybeanGlycine maxt0
Material: susceptible varietye0
Treatment: injurye0
Interactor: Brown Stink Bug Euschistus herosEuschistus herost0
Outcome: activities of lipoxygenase 3 and guaiacol peroxidasee0
Direction: increasee0

Not reportedInteractor roleComparator

Verbatim

e0
“In the susceptible variety, injury caused an increase in the activities of lipoxygenase 3 and guaiacol peroxidase, no change in ascorbate peroxidase, and a decrease in catalase.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–671

t0
“Soybean Response to Herbivory Injury by the Brown Stink Bug Euschistus heros (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–129

Title

Biochemical Aspects of the Soybean Response to Herbivory Injury by the Brown Stink Bug Euschistus heros (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)

Renata Velozo Timbó; Marcelo Hermes-Lima; Luciano Paulino Silva; et al. PLoS ONE 2014. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0109735

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Injury did not change ascorbate peroxidase activity in susceptible soybean.
Intervention effect Injury decreased catalase activity in susceptible soybean.
Intervention effect Injury did not alter monitored enzyme activities in resistant soybean.
Observation Both soybean varieties had 4-5% differential protein expression after 24 hours of injury.
Observation Differential proteins in the susceptible variety were related to stress, defense, and fungal infection.
Observation Protein-profile changes in the resistant variety were related to Calvin cycle enzymes.
Observation Authors interpret susceptible soybean as adapting redox metabolism and stress protein expression after injury.
Observation Authors interpret resistant soybean as mounting a defense response to the herbivore.

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean production showed no significant decrease.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome: productione0
Direction: no significant decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“There was no visual injury in soybean and no significant decrease in production and germination.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1285

Title

Chemical Management of Bidens pilosa (L.) and Euphorbia heterophylla (L.) and Seed Germination in Genetically Modified Soybean Glyphosate Tolerant

André Luiz de Souza Lacerda; Edgar Gomes Ferreira de Beauclair; João Nicanildo Bastos dos Santos American Journal of BioScience 2019. doi:10.11648/j.ajbio.20190705.11

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Glyphosate controlled Bidens pilosa above 90%.
Intervention effect Glyphosate controlled Euphorbia heterophylla above 90%.
Observation Soybean showed no visual injury under the tested herbicide treatments.
Observation Soybean germination showed no significant decrease.

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean germination showed no significant decrease.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome: germinatione0
Direction: no significant decreasee0

Verbatim

e0
“There was no visual injury in soybean and no significant decrease in production and germination.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1285

Title

Chemical Management of Bidens pilosa (L.) and Euphorbia heterophylla (L.) and Seed Germination in Genetically Modified Soybean Glyphosate Tolerant

André Luiz de Souza Lacerda; Edgar Gomes Ferreira de Beauclair; João Nicanildo Bastos dos Santos American Journal of BioScience 2019. doi:10.11648/j.ajbio.20190705.11

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Glyphosate controlled Bidens pilosa above 90%.
Intervention effect Glyphosate controlled Euphorbia heterophylla above 90%.
Observation Soybean showed no visual injury under the tested herbicide treatments.
Observation Soybean production showed no significant decrease.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Imazapyr did not decrease soybean yield with the other herbicides.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment: Imazapyre0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: did not increasee0
Comparator: chlorimuron, imazaquin, or imazethapyre0

Verbatim

e0
“Imazapyr did not increase soybean injury or decrease yield provided by chlorimuron, imazaquin, or imazethapyr.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1104

Title

Influence of Imazapyr on the Control of Pitted Morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) and Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) with Chlorimuron, Imazaquin, and Imazethapyr

Dennis G. Riley; David R. Shaw Weed Science 1988. doi:10.1017/s0043174500075585

Other claims from this paper (10)

Intervention effect Imazapyr alone at up to 4 g ai/ha gave little or no johnsongrass control.
Intervention effect Imazapyr alone at up to 4 g ai/ha gave little or no pitted morningglory control.
Intervention effect Adding imazapyr to imazethapyr or imazaquin synergistically increased johnsongrass control after eight weeks.
Intervention effect Adding imazapyr to imazethapyr or imazaquin synergistically increased pitted morningglory control after eight weeks.
Observation Enhancing johnsongrass control required higher imazethapyr or imazaquin rates than enhancing pitted morningglory control.
Intervention effect Imazapyr mixed with chlorimuron showed no synergistic increase in johnsongrass control.
Intervention effect Imazapyr mixed with chlorimuron showed no synergistic increase in pitted morningglory control.
Intervention effect Imazapyr mixtures controlled johnsongrass at least as well as the next higher herbicide-alone rate.
Intervention effect Imazapyr mixtures controlled pitted morningglory at least as well as the next higher herbicide-alone rate.
Intervention effect Imazapyr did not increase soybean injury with the other herbicides.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The decrease in grain yield was smaller in the nodulating line T 202.

Taxon: soybeansGlycine maxt0
Material: T 202e0
Outcome: 子実収量e0
Direction: 小さかったe0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

t0
“soybeans”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–34

e0
“子実収量は乾物生産量の減少によって低下したが, その程度もT 202で小さかった”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–316

Title

Excess moisture injury of soybeans cultivated in an upland field converted from paddy. IV. The significance of nodulation under excess moisture condition.

Hideki SUGIMOTO; Tooru SATOU Japanese Journal of Crop Science 1990. doi:10.1626/jcs.59.727

Other claims from this paper (8)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“decrease of soybean injury”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics