Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“straw yield”

41,733 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 6,548 non-evaluative

Over time

1950 ’60 ’70 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

plus 49 earlier · 1920s–1940s

Refine

More filters

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crushed straw plus inoculant improved yield more than burning straw.

Taxon: maizeZea mayse0
Treatment: straw returning by crushing in cooperated with straw-decomposing inoculante0
Outcome: yield-improving effecte0
Direction: bettere0
Comparator: straw returning by burninge0

Verbatim

e0
“straw returning by crushing in cooperated with straw-decomposing inoculant had a better yield-improving effect than straw returning by burning in maize.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 542–694

Title

Effect of Straw Decomposing Inoculant on Maize Straw Returning

Li Che Shanxi nongye kexue 2013

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Inoculant application significantly increased maize yield.
Intervention effect Inoculant with less straw return yielded more than large straw return.
Intervention effect Inoculant increased soil microorganism numbers.
Intervention effect Inoculant promoted straw decomposition.
Intervention effect Inoculant reduced the adverse effect of excess straw return on crop growth.
Intervention effect Inoculant steadily increased soil nutrient contents.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chopped straw gave greater wheat yield benefits than intact straw.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: chopped strawe0
Outcome: yielde1
Direction: greater benefitse1
Comparator: intact strawe0

Verbatim

e0
“chopped straw (compared with intact straw)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1260

e1
“The following aspects of CRR and crop management conferred greater benefits in yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1059

t0
“Wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24

Title

Yield Responses of Wheat to Crop Residue Returning in China: A Meta‐Analysis

Guangping Qi; Yanxia Kang; Minhua Yin; et al. Crop Science 2019. doi:10.2135/cropsci2019.01.0031

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Crop residue returning significantly increased wheat yield by 8.29% versus no returning.
Association Residue returning benefited wheat yield more in Northwest China and specified climate, soil and rotation settings.
Intervention effect Returning residues for 3 to 6 years gave greater wheat yield benefits than other durations.
Intervention effect Residue rates of 3 to 6 t ha −1 gave greater yield benefits than other rates.
Intervention effect Rainfed conditions gave greater wheat yield benefits than irrigated conditions.
Intervention effect Nitrogen application at 200 to 300 kg ha −1 gave greater wheat yield benefits than other rates.
Intervention effect Mulch return increased wheat yield by 12.56%, versus 4.53% with plowing residues into soil.
Association Spring wheat had an 11.90% yield increase versus 7.09% for winter wheat under residue return.

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane straw and stalk yield can be predicted from soil attributes at straw-removal sites.

Taxon: Sugarcanee0
Treatment: straw removale0
Outcome: straw and stalk yielde1

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e1
“The straw and stalk yield can be predicted using soil attributes data at sites where the straw is removed”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1135–1240

e0
“Sugarcane ( Saccharum spp.) straw removal from the field”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–383

Title

Prediction of Sugarcane Yield by Soil Attributes under Straw Removal Management

Lucas Santos Satiro; Maurício Roberto Cherubin; Izaias Pinheiro Lisboa; et al. Agronomy Journal 2018. doi:10.2134/agronj2018.01.0021

Other claims from this paper (4)

Association The best modeling coefficients for stalk yield came from soil data in the 0–20 cm layer.
Intervention effect Straw removal reduced soil C and soil chemical and physical quality in the 0–5 cm layer, depending on site.
Intervention effect Sugarcane straw removal did not influence crop yield.
Mechanism Meteorological conditions may alter the straw/stalk ratio and so influence sugarcane straw yield (hypothesis).

Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Meteorological conditions may alter the straw/stalk ratio and so influence sugarcane straw yield (hypothesis).

Taxon: Sugarcanee0
Outcome: straw yielde5
Qualifier: Meteorological conditions may alter the straw/stalk ratioe5

Verbatim

e5
“Meteorological conditions may alter the straw/stalk ratio and thus influence the sugarcane straw yield”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–325

e0
“Sugarcane ( Saccharum spp.) straw removal from the field”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 327–383

Title

Prediction of Sugarcane Yield by Soil Attributes under Straw Removal Management

Lucas Santos Satiro; Maurício Roberto Cherubin; Izaias Pinheiro Lisboa; et al. Agronomy Journal 2018. doi:10.2134/agronj2018.01.0021

Other claims from this paper (4)

Association Sugarcane straw and stalk yield can be predicted from soil attributes at straw-removal sites.
Association The best modeling coefficients for stalk yield came from soil data in the 0–20 cm layer.
Intervention effect Straw removal reduced soil C and soil chemical and physical quality in the 0–5 cm layer, depending on site.
Intervention effect Sugarcane straw removal did not influence crop yield.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice straw after mushroom cultivation gave higher yield than removing all straw.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Treatment: rice straw after mushroom cultivatione0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: highere0
Comparator: removal all the rice strawe0

Verbatim

e0
“Application of rice straw after mushroom cultivation or burning rice straw obtained the higher yield than removal all the rice straw”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–540

Title

Effects of straw management, tillage practices on soil fertility and grain yield of rice

Tuyen Quang Tran; Pham Sy Tan 2001

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Rice yield did not differ among tillage practices across six seasons.
Intervention effect Burning rice straw gave higher yield than removing all straw.
Intervention effect Returning rice straw by burning increased soil nitrogen and phosphorus.
Intervention effect Returning rice straw by leaving it over increased soil nitrogen and phosphorus.
Intervention effect Returning rice straw by incorporation increased soil nitrogen and phosphorus.
Intervention effect Returning rice straw through mushroom cultivation increased soil nitrogen and phosphorus.
Observation Soil Ca, Mg, Na, Zn and Cu changed very little over three years and six rice seasons.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw return stabilized yield relative to straw biochar.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Treatment: straw returne0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: stabilizee0
Comparator: straw biochar applicatione0

Verbatim

e0
“Compared to straw biochar application, straw return can stabilize the yield and improve the lodging resistance of rice”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1535–1653

Title

Effects of Two Straw Return Methods Coupled with Raising Ducks in Paddy Fields on Stem Lodging Characteristics

Xiangsheng Gong; Xiangjie Meng; Ya Zhang; et al. Sustainability 2022. doi:10.3390/su142012984

Other claims from this paper (14)

Observation RNN rice yielded 6258.02 kg ha−1.
Intervention effect RND increased yield by 15.51% versus RNN.
Intervention effect RSN increased yield by 3.06% versus RNN.
Intervention effect RSD increased yield by 10.23% versus RNN.
Intervention effect RBN increased yield by 1.59% versus RNN.
Intervention effect RBD decreased yield by 5.01% versus RNN.
Observation Straw treatments coupled with ducks had both negative and positive lodging effects.
Mechanism Stem mechanical properties were mainly determined by weight, length, plumpness and culm anatomy.
Intervention effect RND, RSN and RSD increased bending moment at breaking, lodging strength and bending strength.
Observation Direct straw return with ducks could increase lodging resistance.
Observation Straw biochar return with ducks could increase lodging resistance.
Observation Rice-duck co-culture increased lodging resistance while yielding more.
Intervention effect Straw return improved lodging resistance relative to straw biochar.
Recommendation The authors recommend exploring direct straw return with ducks to improve lodging resistance while ensuring yield.

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ear yield with straw and ear yield without straw had a correlation estimate of 0.92.

Organ / stage: eare0
Outcome: ear yield without strawe0
Value: 0.92e0
Qualifier: ear yield with strawe0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0
“The highest correlation estimates were found between the variables ear yield without straw and grain yield, and between ear yield with straw and ear yield without straw, with magnitudes 0.95 and 0.92, respectively.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–973

Title

Correlations between agronomic traits and path analysis for silage production in maize hybrids

Jocarla Ambrosim Crevelari; Nayara Norrene Lacerda Durães; Laila Cecília Ramos Bendia; et al. Bragantia 2018. doi:10.1590/1678-4499.2016512

Other claims from this paper (3)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw incorporation with film increased grain yield 53% versus straw alone.

Treatment: straw incorporation with film covere0
Outcome: grain yielde0
Direction: increasede0
Value: 53%e0
Comparator: straw incorporation onlye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0
“straw incorporation with film cover increased grain yield by 53% as compared to straw incorporation only”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1013

Title

Fall Straw Incorporation with Plastic Film Cover Increases Corn Yield and Water Use Efficiency under a Semi-Arid Climate

Zhe Zhang; Na Li; Zhanxiang Sun; et al. Agriculture 2022. doi:10.3390/agriculture12122151

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Straw incorporation with film increased grain yield 102% versus control.
Intervention effect Film cover accelerated straw decomposition by 20% relative to straw incorporation.
Intervention effect Straw incorporation with film significantly increased soil water content before planting.
Intervention effect Straw incorporation with film significantly increased corn water uptake.
Intervention effect Straw incorporation with film significantly increased corn water use efficiency.
Intervention effect Film cover advanced corn tasseling by 10 days versus uncovered treatments.

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain and straw yields were positively correlated; grain yield explained 26% of straw-yield variation.

Taxon: spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome: straw yielde0
Direction: positively correlatede0
Value: 26%e0
Comparator: Grain yielde0

Verbatim

e0
“Grain yield and straw yield were positively correlated (P < 0.0001) with GY accounting for 26% of the variation in SY.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–803

t0
“spring wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–116

Title

Variations in straw fodder quality and grain–Straw relationships in a mapping population of 287 diverse spring wheat lines

Arun K. Joshi; Uttam Kumar; V.K. Mishra; et al. Field Crops Research 2019. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2019.107627

Other claims from this paper (17)

Observation Lines differed significantly for all measured traits except ADF and ADL.
Association Year and location strongly affected all traits.
Observation Straw quality varied little among lines relative to grain and straw yield.
Observation Straw nitrogen differed by about 30% between extreme lines.
Observation NDF differed by at most four percentage units between lines.
Observation ADF differed by at most four percentage units between lines.
Observation IVOMD differed by less than three percentage units between lines.
Association Straw nitrogen was weakly negatively associated with grain and straw yields.
Association IVOMD was weakly negatively associated with grain and straw yields.
Association ME was weakly negatively associated with grain and straw yields.
Association Straw NDF and ADF were weakly positively associated with grain yield.
Association Straw NDF, ADF and ADL were weakly positively correlated with straw yield.
Observation Five genomic regions contributed to six straw quality traits.
Observation ADF and ADL mapped to a shared QTL region on chromosome 2B.
Association IVOMD and ME QTLs on chromosome 5B associated with SNP marker wsnp_Ku_c35090_44349517.
Observation Individual QTL explained low to medium phenotypic variation.
Observation Grain and straw yields varied about two-fold among lines.

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw yield per feddan correlated positively and highly significantly with straw yield traits.

Taxon: flax genotypesLinum usitatissimumt0
Outcome: Straw yield/ fede0
Direction: positivee0
Comparator: Straw yield traitse0

Verbatim

e0
“Straw yield/ fed showed positive and highly significant correlation coefficient with all Straw yield traits i.e. fiber yield /fed, straw yield /plant, total and technical length / plant, fiber percentage, fiber length and fiber fineness”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1953–2189

t0
“some flax genotypes”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–93

Title

Studies on mean performance, correlation and path analysis coefficient of some flax genotypes under different environmental conditions.

G El-Shimy; M Hussein; Sanaa Hassan; et al. Annals of Agricultural Science Moshtohor 2015. doi:10.21608/assjm.2015.109935

Other claims from this paper (15)

Observation Genotypes, locations and their interaction differed highly significantly for most straw and seed yield traits.
Observation S.31/3/2 significantly surpassed other flax genotypes in straw yield traits.
Observation S.413/3/4 followed S.31/3/2 in straw yield traits.
Observation Sakha 1 ranked third in straw yield traits.
Observation S.16 had the highest seed yield traits, followed by S.2.
Observation S.2 followed S.16 in seed yield traits.
Observation Sakha 2 ranked third for seed yield traits.
Observation Other tested flax genotypes had intermediate straw and seed yield trait estimates.
Association Seed yield per feddan correlated positively and highly significantly with seed yield traits.
Association Technical length per plant contributed 39.21% to increasing straw yield per feddan.
Association Straw yield per plant contributed 9.56% to increasing straw yield per feddan.
Association 1000 seed weight contributed 23.29% to increasing seed yield per feddan.
Association Seed yield per plant contributed 11.78% to increasing seed yield per feddan.
Recommendation The authors recommend selection for technical length per plant to maximize straw yield.
Recommendation The authors recommend selection for 1000-seed weight to maximize seed yield.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“straw yield”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics