Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“straw yield”

41,733 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 6,548 non-evaluative

Over time

1950 ’60 ’70 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

plus 49 earlier · 1920s–1940s

Refine

More filters

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw yield and grain straw yield followed the grain yield pattern.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome: straw yield and grain straw yielde0
Direction: similare0
Comparator: grain yielde0

Verbatim

e0
“The pattern of straw yield and grain straw yield was similar to grain yield.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 693–769

t0
“wheat”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–83

Title

Effect of tillage practices and cultivars on growth and biomass production of wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.)

Surender Singh Yadav; Shivnath Das; Sunil Kumar; et al. Progressive Agriculture 2010

Other claims from this paper (4)

Intervention effect Bed planting gave significantly higher wheat grain yield, 40 8 q/ha, and was at par with conventional tillage.
Intervention effect Zero tillage produced nearly the same yield as conventional tillage.
Observation HUW-468 had the highest biomass yield among cultivars, followed by PBW-373.
Intervention effect Bed planting had higher growth attributes than conventional tillage and zero tillage in that order.

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw length was not a good predictor of cultivar straw yield.

Taxon: spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Organ / stage: straw lengthe0
Outcome: straw yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“Neither grain yield nor straw length were good predictors of straw yield of cultivars.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–620

t0
“spring barley”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–43

Title

Straw and grain production in spring barley cultivars

Ethel M. White The Journal of Agricultural Science 1987. doi:10.1017/s0021859600079284

Other claims from this paper (8)

Observation Inga had a mean straw yield of 2·75 t/ha.
Observation Golden Promise had a mean straw yield of 1·94 t/ha.
Observation Grain and straw yields varied across years.
Observation Straw production was more consistent between years for individual cultivars than grain yield.
Association High grain yield was not associated with high straw yield.
Observation Midas had a straw to grain ratio of 0·72.
Observation Corgi had a straw to grain ratio of 0·51.
Association Grain yield was not a good predictor of cultivar straw yield.

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lentil genotypes varied significantly in grain yield, straw yield and straw nutritive value.

Taxon: lentilLens culinarist0
Outcome: grain yield, straw yield and nutritive value of strawe0

Verbatim

t0
“lentil (Lens culinaris)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–97

e0
“Wide genotypic variation ( P < 0.001) was found in grain yield, straw yield and nutritive value of straw”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–498

Title

Integrating straw yield and quality into multi‐dimensional improvement of lentil (Lens culinaris)

Ashraf Alkhtib; Jane Wamatu; T Tolemariam Ejeta; et al. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 2017. doi:10.1002/jsfa.8282

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Urea treatment significantly improved straw nutritive value.
Observation Genotypic range exceeded the urea effect by 13.3 units for crude protein.
Observation Genotypic range exceeded the urea effect by 56 units for in vitro organic matter digestibility.
Observation Genotypic range exceeded the urea effect by 0.82 units for metabolisable energy.
Observation Genotypic range exceeded the urea effect by 106 units for potential dry matter intake.
Observation Genotypic range exceeded the urea effect by 18.3 units for potential crude protein intake.
Observation Genotypic range exceeded the urea effect by 1.62 units for potential metabolisable energy intake.
Association Acid detergent fibre strongly correlated with other straw nutritive-value parameters.
Method / resource Acid detergent fibre predicted in vitro organic matter digestibility with R2 of 0.9.
Method / resource Acid detergent fibre predicted metabolisable energy with R2 of 0.8.
Association Straw yield was weakly correlated with grain yield.
Recommendation The authors conclude grain yield and straw nutritive traits can improve simultaneously.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Decomposers with straw improved wheat yield and yield components relative to straw removal.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: These decomposerse0
Outcome: yield and yield componentse0
Direction: improvede0
Comparator: straw removale0

Verbatim

e0
“These decomposers significantly improved the yield and yield components in wheat compared with straw removal.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–605

Title

Effect of rice (Oryza sativa) straw management on growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum)

D.J. RAJKHOWA; O. BORAH Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v53i2.4843

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Rice straw with cellulose-decomposing microorganisms and earthworms improved wheat grain yield by 2.46 Vha.
Intervention effect The decomposer treatments increased nutrient uptake.
Intervention effect The decomposer treatments increased available soil N, P and K at harvest.
Intervention effect The decomposer treatments increased the benefit to cost ratio.
Intervention effect Straw incorporation increased soil organic carbon by 2-1 1% relative to straw removal.
Intervention effect Straw incorporation substantially increased soil microbial population regardless of decomposer.
Intervention effect CDM inoculation built up the soil microbial population.

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tachisuzuka straw yield exceeded Kusanohoshi straw yield.

Taxon: riceOryza sativat0
Material: Tachisuzukae0
Outcome: straw yielde0
Direction: remarkably highere0
Comparator: Kusanohoshie0

Verbatim

e0
“The straw yield of Tachisuzuka was remarkably higher than that of Kusanohoshi but its grain yield was lower”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 468–575

t0
“rice cultivar”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–34

Title

'Tachisuzuka', a new rice cultivar with high straw yield and high sugar content for whole-crop silage use

Kei Matsushita; Shuichi Iida; Osamu Ideta; et al. Breeding Science 2011. doi:10.1270/jsbbs.61.86

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observation Tachisuzuka culms were 11 cm longer than Kusanohoshi culms.
Observation The Tachisuzuka short panicle resembled the sp1 mutant panicle.
Observation Tachisuzuka had high lodging resistance at yellow ripening and one month later.
Observation Tachisuzuka grain yield was below Kusanohoshi grain yield.
Association The low grain to straw ratio was interpreted as reducing cattle nutrient loss compared with Kusanohoshi WCS.
Observation Tachisuzuka sugar content was markedly above Kusanohoshi.

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lentil genotypes differed significantly in grain yield, straw yield, and straw nutritive traits.

Taxon: lentilLens culinarist0
Outcome: grain yield, straw yields and straw nutritive traitse0
Direction: variatione0

Verbatim

e0
“highly significant genotypic variation (P<0.05) in grain yield, straw yields and straw nutritive traits”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–734

t0
“lentil”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 58–64

Title

SELECTING FOR FOOD-FEED TRAITS IN EARLY AND LATE MATURING LENTIL GENOTYPES(Lens culinaris)

Jane Wamatu; Asemahegn Mersha; Adugna Tolera; et al. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences 2017. doi:10.18006/2017.5(5).697.705

Other claims from this paper (5)

Association Grain yield and straw yield were positively related.
Association Grain yield correlations with straw nutritive parameters were insignificant or negative.
Association Maturity type correlations with straw traits were neutral or negative.
Association Genotype by environment interactions significantly affected straw yield and nutritive traits.
Recommendation The authors infer lentil genotypes can combine food and feed traits.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All trials showed wide genotypic ranges for grain yield, straw yield and straw quality.

Taxon: CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum)Cicer arietinumt0
Outcome: grain yield, straw yield and straw qualitye0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“All trials showed wide genotypic ranges in various traits related to grain yield, straw yield and straw quality.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–462

t0
“CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–89

Title

SELECTING FOR FOOD-FEED TRAITS IN desi AND kabuli GENOTYPES OF CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum)

Jane Wamatu; Tena Alemu; Adugna Tolera; et al. Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences 2017. doi:10.18006/2017.5(6).852.860

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Burning rice straw gave higher yield than removing all straw.

Taxon: riceOryza sativae0
Treatment: burning rice strawe0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: highere0
Comparator: removal all the rice strawe0

Verbatim

e0
“Application of rice straw after mushroom cultivation or burning rice straw obtained the higher yield than removal all the rice straw”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–540

Title

Effects of straw management, tillage practices on soil fertility and grain yield of rice

Tuyen Quang Tran; Pham Sy Tan 2001

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Rice yield did not differ among tillage practices across six seasons.
Intervention effect Rice straw after mushroom cultivation gave higher yield than removing all straw.
Intervention effect Returning rice straw by burning increased soil nitrogen and phosphorus.
Intervention effect Returning rice straw by leaving it over increased soil nitrogen and phosphorus.
Intervention effect Returning rice straw by incorporation increased soil nitrogen and phosphorus.
Intervention effect Returning rice straw through mushroom cultivation increased soil nitrogen and phosphorus.
Observation Soil Ca, Mg, Na, Zn and Cu changed very little over three years and six rice seasons.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At zero nitrogen, straw retention tended to increase straw yield relative to straw removal.

Treatment: straw retainede0
Outcome: straw yielde0
Direction: tended to be greatere0
Comparator: straw removal treatmente0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0
“Compared to straw removal treatment, seed yield, straw yield, and total N uptake in seed + straw tended to be greater with straw retained at the zero-N rate used in the study.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1383

Title

Influence of Long-term Tillage, Straw, and N Fertilizer Management on Crop Yield, N Uptake, and N Balance Sheet in Two Contrasting Soil Types

Sukhdev S. Malhi; M. Nyborg; M. F. Dyck; et al. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2011. doi:10.1080/00103624.2011.609262

Other claims from this paper (12)

Intervention effect Increasing nitrogen rate up to 100 kg N ha−1 increased seed yield under both tillage systems.
Intervention effect Increasing nitrogen rate up to 100 kg N ha−1 increased straw yield under both tillage systems.
Intervention effect Increasing nitrogen rate up to 100 kg N ha−1 increased total nitrogen uptake in seed and straw.
Intervention effect Conventional tillage increased average seed yield by 279 kg ha−1 relative to zero tillage.
Intervention effect Conventional tillage increased average straw yield by 252 kg ha−1 relative to zero tillage.
Intervention effect Conventional tillage increased average total nitrogen uptake by 6.0 kg N ha−1 relative to zero tillage.
Association Tillage differences were greater at Breton than at Ellerslie.
Intervention effect At zero nitrogen, straw retention tended to increase seed yield relative to straw removal.
Intervention effect At zero nitrogen, straw retention tended to increase total nitrogen uptake relative to straw removal.
Observation Unaccounted applied nitrogen over 1980–2008 ranged from 1114 to 1846 kg N ha−1 at Breton.
Observation Unaccounted applied nitrogen over 1980–2008 ranged from 845 to 1665 kg N ha−1 at Ellerslie.
Mechanism Long-term straw retention suggests gradual improvement in soil productivity.

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield was not a good predictor of cultivar straw yield.

Taxon: spring barleyHordeum vulgaret0
Outcome: straw yielde0
Comparator: grain yielde0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“Neither grain yield nor straw length were good predictors of straw yield of cultivars.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–620

t0
“spring barley”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–43

Title

Straw and grain production in spring barley cultivars

Ethel M. White The Journal of Agricultural Science 1987. doi:10.1017/s0021859600079284

Other claims from this paper (8)

Observation Inga had a mean straw yield of 2·75 t/ha.
Observation Golden Promise had a mean straw yield of 1·94 t/ha.
Observation Grain and straw yields varied across years.
Observation Straw production was more consistent between years for individual cultivars than grain yield.
Association High grain yield was not associated with high straw yield.
Observation Midas had a straw to grain ratio of 0·72.
Observation Corgi had a straw to grain ratio of 0·51.
Association Straw length was not a good predictor of cultivar straw yield.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“straw yield”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics