View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon: maize ✕
Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Under low temperature, exogenous DA-6 reduced the shoot and root fresh and dry weight decrease to 5.81%~13.57%.
Organ / stageshoot and root e2 Outcomeshoot and root fresh weight and dry weight e2 Verbatim
e0 “Spring maize sowing occurs during a period of low temperature (LT) in Northeast China ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–85 e2 “The shoot and root fresh weight and dry weight decrease d by 17.70%~20.82% in the LT treatment, and decrease d by 5.81%~13.57% in the LT + DA-6 treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–483 Other claims from this paper (9) Mechanism observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Low photosynthesis rates hampered maize dry weight accumulation, which decrease d by 8.00% -74.43%.
Outcomeaccumulation of plant dry weight e0 Qualifierlow of photosynthesis rates e0 Verbatim
e0 “The low of photosynthesis rates resulted in the accumulation of plant dry weight was hampered, and there was a decrease of 8.00% -74.43%. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1434 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–126 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Low light stress at flowering stage decrease d daily weight gain of aboveground total dry matter in maize.
Treatmentlow light stress at flowering stage e1 Outcomedaily weight gain of aboveground total dry matter e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Kernel Number per Ear of Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–79 e1 “It was found that low light stress at flowering stage led to the decrease in daily weight gain of aboveground total dry matter ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–603 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Maize plants without water supply had grain dry weight decrease d by 36 % compared with plants given three-time water application.
Treatmentwithout water supply e0 Outcomedry weight of the grains e0 Comparatorplants with three-time water application e0 Verbatim
e0 “Plants without water supply showed a decrease in the dry weight of the grains as much as 36 % compared to the plants with three-time water application ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1089 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit decrease d maize growth and yield by approximately 25%, in cluding height, cob length, root dry weight , grains per cob and 100-grain weight .
TreatmentWater deficit stress e0 Outcomegrowth and yield e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Water deficit stress caused a significant decrease (by approximately 25%) in growth and yield of both maize varieties by decreasing plant height, cob length, dry root weight , grains per cob and 100-grain weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–652 t0 “Maize (Zea mays L) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–77 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Coal fly ash up to 20 t ha-1 decrease d maize dry weight .
Treatmentcoal fly ash up to 20 t ha-1 e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the application of coal fly ash up to 20 t ha-1 also in hibited the growth of maize by marking a decrease in the results of measuring the dry weight and height of maize plants. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1216 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Root and shoot length and fresh and dry weight s declined under water stress.
Outcomeroot and shoot length, fresh root and shoot weight and dry root and shoot weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “All morphological parameters like root and shoot length, fresh root and shoot weight and dry root and shoot weight exhibited a decrease in response to water stress. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1128 t0 “MAIZE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 74–79 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower radiation in creased shoot dry weight ratio and decrease d root dry weight ratio.
Treatmentdecreased solar radiation e0 Outcomeratio of shoot dry weight (SWR) to whole plant dry weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “maize responded to the decrease d solar radiation through the in crease in ratio of shoot dry weight (SWR) to whole plant dry weight and the decrease in ratio of root dry weight (RWR) to whole plant dry weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–941 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
High humidity did not decrease maize ash content.
Treatment>95% relative humidity e1 Directionneither a decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight ) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487 e1 “Maize plants were grown with nutrients supplied at adequate levels in hydroculture or in soil at 50–60% and at >95% relative humidity ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–277 e2 “there was neither a decrease in growth (fresh weight and dry weight ) nor in ash content of the ‘humid’plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–487 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Highest encapsulated oil doses caused greatest declines in weed number and dry weight .
Treatmenthighest doses of microencapsulated EOs e0 Outcomenumber and dry weight of the weeds e0 Directiongreatest decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The highest doses of microencapsulated EOs, particularly those containing peppermint or caraway, caused the greatest decrease in the number and dry weight of the weeds. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–947 t0 “maize (Zea mays ) and common weeds ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–105 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.