View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought significantly decrease d shoot fresh and dry weight in both maize populations.
Materialpopulation IP3722 e1 Treatmentdrought treatment e0 Outcomeshoot fresh and dry weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Two populations responded to drought treatment by a significant decrease of shoot fresh and dry weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–586 e1 “maize plants (population IP3722) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–304 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Rosette-stage water deficit significantly decrease d plant dry weight .
Treatmentwater deficit at rosset stage e0 Outcomeplant dry weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Occurring water deficit at rosset stage led to significant decrease in crown diameter and plant dry weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1079 t0 “oilseed rape ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 56–68 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Grass competition significantly reduced mesquite dry weight .
Treatmentgrown with S. scoparium e0 OutcomeP. glandulosa above-, belowground, and total dry weighte0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “When P. glandulosa was grown with S. scoparium , there was a significant decrease in P. glandulosa above-, belowground, and total dry weight at all S. scoparium densities tested. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–538 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Dry weight decrease d more in Tokak 157/37 than Avcı-2002.
Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in dry weight was more significant in Tokak 157/37 than in Avcı-2002. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–302 t0 “barley cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 151–167 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Wheat shoot fresh and dry weight declined significantly across in tercropping ratios.
Treatmentdifferent ratios e0 Outcomefresh and dry weight of wheat shoots e0 Verbatim
e0 “The fresh and dry weight of wheat shoots showed a significant decrease at different ratios compared to the control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–858 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher salinity significantly decrease d seedling dry weight and vigor.
Treatmenthigher salinity level e0 Outcomeseedling dry weight and seedling vigor e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “At higher salinity level, significant decrease in shoots and roots length, seedling dry weight and seedling vigor ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1054 e1 “soft wheat Triticum aestivum L genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–227 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Fresh and dry shoot weight decrease d significantly with M. hapla .
Outcomefresh and dry shoot weight e0 Settingpolyhouse condition e1 Verbatim
t0 “Grapevine Cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–33 e0 “A significant decrease (P ≤ 0.05) in fresh and dry shoot weight as well as fresh and dry root weight was observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1542–1655 e1 “evaluate ten grapevine cultivars against root-knot nematode Meloidogyne hapla under polyhouse condition ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–130 Other claims from this paper (19) Observation observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Fresh and dry root weight decrease d significantly with M. hapla .
Outcomefresh and dry root weight e0 Settingpolyhouse condition e1 Verbatim
t0 “Grapevine Cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–33 e0 “A significant decrease (P ≤ 0.05) in fresh and dry shoot weight as well as fresh and dry root weight was observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1542–1655 e1 “evaluate ten grapevine cultivars against root-knot nematode Meloidogyne hapla under polyhouse condition ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 27–130 Other claims from this paper (19) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Root dry weight decrease d significantly under high Mn.
Treatmenthigh Mn (5000 μ M) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Mn hyperaccumulator Phytolacca acinosa was in vestigated in this study. Results showed that high Mn (5000 μ M) in culture solution lead to typical Mn toxicity symptoms in leaves of P. acinosa and decrease of dry matter accumulation in shoots whereas there are no obvious toxicity symptoms and significant decrease of dry weight in roots ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–452 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Dry weight decrease d more in Tokak 157/37 than in Avcı-2002.
Not reported Treatment
Verbatim
e0 “The decrease in dry weight was more significant in Tokak 157/37 than in Avcı-2002 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–302 t0 “barley cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 151–167 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.