View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf relative water content fell 29% in experiment 2.
Treatmentwater-deficit stress t0 Outcomeleaf relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “25 and 29% decrease in leaf relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1047 t0 “tomato under water -deficit stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 137–170 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress significantly decrease d relative water content and chlorophyll stability in dex.
Outcomerelative water content, chlorophyll stability index e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Water stress was found to decrease significantly in the data of photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, relative water content , chlorophyll stability in dex ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–820 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress decrease d relative water content .
Treatmentwatering regimes e1 Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “decrease in relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 520–554 e1 “The cuttings of Populus deltoides L. (clone Kranti) were exposed to four different water ing regimes (100, 75, 50 and 25% of the field capacity) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–382 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Skipping irrigation at flowering decrease d relative water content in sunflower.
Treatmentskipping irrigation at this stage e0 Outcomerelative water content (RWC %) e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “skipping irrigation at this stage caused marked decrease in chlorophyll content in leaves, relative water content (RWC %) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1032 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf relative water content tended to decrease with PEG stress in tensity and time.
Treatmentstress intensity and the treating time e0 Outcomerelative water content in leaves e0 Verbatim
e0 “the relative water content in leaves showed a decrease d tendency with the in crease of stress in tensity and the treating time ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–468 t0 “Salak [Salacca zalacca (Gaertner) Voss] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–82 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Susceptible rice genotypes showed a larger decrease in relative water content than tolerant genotypes after 3 h low temperature.
Outcomerelative water content (RWC) e1 Qualifierto a higher extent e1 Comparatortolerant genotypes e1 Verbatim
t0 “tolerant and susceptible rice genotypes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–82 e1 “susceptible rice genotypes show an in crease in lipid peroxide levels and decrease in relative water content (RWC) to a higher extent in comparison to tolerant genotypes in response to 3 h LT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–406 Other claims from this paper (5) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Cj rootstock showed the smallest decrease in leaf relative water content and leaf area under drought.
Outcomeleaf relative water content and leaf area e1 Verbatim
e0 “Harumi tangor plants grafted onto Poncirus trifoliata (Pt), Citrus junos (Cj), and Citrus tangerine (Ct) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–320 e1 “The leaf relative water content and leaf area of the three rootstocks decrease d with in creasing drought stress, with the smallest decrease in Cj ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–466 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit significantly decrease d relative water content , stomatal conductance, and osmotic adjustment.
Treatmentwater deficits e0 Outcomerelative water content (RWC), stomatal conductance (gs), osmotic adjustment (Oadj) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Safflower ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–69 e0 “water deficits led to a significant decrease in relative water content (RWC), stomatal conductance (gs), osmotic adjustment (Oadj) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–607 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water deficit slightly decrease d relative water content .
TaxonCenchrus ciliaris and Digitaria commutatae0 Outcomerelative water content e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In this view, we assess here drought- in duced changes in Cenchrus ciliaris and Digitaria commutata ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–375 e2 “water deficit led to a slight decrease of relative water content (RWC) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–622 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
MT alleviated the osmotic-stress decrease in relative water content on day 7.
TreatmentMT pretreatment e0 Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Osmotic- in duced 38.22% or 48.37% decrease in relative water content could be significantly alleviated by MT pretreatment on day 7 or day 14, respectively. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–735 t0 “Forage Oat (Avena sativa ) Seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 138–173 Other claims from this paper (13) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.