View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Recovery treatment reduced tree growth rates .
Treatmentrecovery treatment e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–414 e1 “Trees in the recovery treatment also exhibited lower growth rates and increased xylem damage in their older rings. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1063 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Relative growth rates showed a slow recovery in the two seasons after elevated ozone exposure ended.
Outcomeslow recovery of relative growth rates e2 Verbatim
t0 “birch (Betula pendula Roth) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–118 e2 “a slow recovery of relative growth rates during the following two seasons without elevated ozone was apparent ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1540 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing N fertilizer rates decreased apparent N recovery and N use efficiency of rice.
Treatmentincreasing rates of N fertilizer e6 Outcomeapparent N recovery and Nuse efficiency e6 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e6 “There was a significant increase in the N uptake of the rice but a decrease in the apparent N recovery and Nuse efficiency of applied fertilizer N, with the application of increasing rates of N fertilizer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1215 t0 “rice growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 28–39 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Applied zinc efficiencies decreased as zinc application rates increased, except crop recovery efficiency.
TreatmentZn application rates e0 OutcomeEfficiencies of applied Zn e0 Qualifierexcept crop recovery efficiency e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Efficiencies of applied Zn decreased with increasing Zn application rates , except crop recovery efficiency. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–793 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Apparent N recovery of whole-crop barley decreased with sesbania plus increasing N fertilizer rates .
Treatmentsesbania plus increasing rates of N fertilizer e5 OutcomeApparent N recovery (ANR) e5 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Growth and Yield of Whole Crop Barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–92 e5 “Apparent N recovery (ANR) of whole-crop barely showed decreased with sesbania plus increasing rates of N fertilizer ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1543 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Higher nitrogen rates decreased nitrogen use, uptake, recovery and agronomic efficiencies.
OutcomeN use efficiency, N uptake efficiency, N recovery efficiency, and Agronomic efficiency e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “higher rates decreased N use efficiency, N uptake efficiency, N recovery efficiency, and Agronomic efficiency ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1653 t0 “Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–28 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation author interpretation original result negative projected Claim · model-written summary
Secondary growth rates of 1.41–2.0 Mg ha−1 yr−1 indicate recovery times of about 69 to 97 years to reach average control aboveground biomass (137 ± 12.3 Mg ha−1).
Taxonsecondary montane forests t0 Qualifier1.41–2.0 Mg ha−1 yr−1 for DBH ≥ 10 cm e2 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “secondary montane forests in Peru ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–56 e2 “Secondary growth rates (1.41–2.0 Mg ha−1 yr−1 for DBH ≥ 10 cm) indicate recovery times of ca. 69 to 97 years to reach average control AGB values (137 ± 12.3 Mg ha−1) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1191–1356 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Late damage prevented recovery of lost biomass despite higher relative growth rates .
Treatmentdamage occurred any later than the early stages of tillering e0 Outcomerecover lost biomass e0 Directionnot able to recover e0 Comparatorcontrol plants e0 Verbatim
e0 “Damaged plants were not able to recover lost biomass when damage occurred any later than the early stages of tillering despite observed relative growth rates which were higher than control plants. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–707 t0 “SPRING WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–121 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought-stressed saplings had the lowest growth rates .
TreatmentDrought-stressed e4 Verbatim
e0 “saplings of Bertholletia excelsa , Dipteryx odorata , and Tachigali vulgaris to water deficit followed by recovery ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 361–473 e4 “Drought-stressed plants had the lowest growth rates , more biomass allocated to roots and less leaf biomass ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 866–972 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought reduced growth rates in young S. saponaria plants.
Treatmentdrought conditions e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Young S. saponaria plants showed reduced growth rates under drought conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–736 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.