View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Cultivar genotype did not influence date pollen viability .
Outcomeviability of pollen e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Cultivar genotype did out influence the viability of pollen ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–387 t0 “Date Pollen ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–31 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Mechanical injury did not affect viability .
TreatmentMechanical injury e0 Directionwithout affecting e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Mechanical injury increased sugar leaching without affecting viability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–695 t0 “Germinating Barley ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–56 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Seed viability was unaffected during the first two cycles.
Treatmentfirst two cycles e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “seed viability was not affected during the first two cycles ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–394 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Pollen viability did not differ significantly among the four watermelon pollenizer cultivars.
Outcomepollen viability e0 Directionno significant differences e0 Verbatim
e0 “There were no significant differences in pollen viability among cultivars and all cultivars had high average viability . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–829 t0 “Watermelon ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–47 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Temperature and light did not affect tomato ovule viability .
TreatmentTemperature and light e0 Directiondid not affect e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Temperature and light did not affect ovule viability , although HTLI showed least ovule viability . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1353 t0 “in tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–107 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Rootstocks did not significantly affect pollen viability .
Outcomepollen viability e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “None of the rootstocks affects pollen viability significantly during the period of study. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–718 e1 “Kinnow started flowering ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–440 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Pollen viability was similar in both Plumeria species.
Outcomepollen viability e0 Directionremained similar e0 Verbatim
e0 “pollen viability remained similar for both ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1064 t0 “Plumeria ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–94 Other claims from this paper (12) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Seed weight did not correlate with viability .
Directionno correlation e0 Verbatim
e0 “no correlation appeared between seed weight and viability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–989 t0 “Lechuguilla ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–41 Other claims from this paper (13) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Cleaning did not improve viability in Begonia accessions.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “no accessions of Begonia or Tagetes had improved viability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1584 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Cleaning did not improve viability in Tagetes accessions.
Not reported Treatment Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “no accessions of Begonia or Tagetes had improved viability ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1584 Other claims from this paper (11) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.