Refine ·

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Clear filters
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar genotype did not influence date pollen viability.

Taxon
Datet0
Organ / stage
pollene0
Outcome
viability of pollene0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Cultivar genotype did out influence the viability of pollen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–387
t0

“Date Pollen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–31

Title

Factors Influencing Date Pollen Viability

M. O. El Mardi; E. Consolacion; O. AI-Manthari; et al. Journal of Agricultural and Marine Sciences [JAMS] 1997. doi:10.24200/jams.vol2iss0pp55-58

Other claims from this paper (9)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical injury did not affect viability.

Treatment
Mechanical injurye0
Outcome
viabilitye0
Direction
without affectinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Mechanical injury increased sugar leaching without affecting viability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–695
t0

“Germinating Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–56

Title

Viability and Leaching of Sugars from Germinating Barley1

Aref A. Abdul‐Baki; James D. Anderson Crop Science 1970. doi:10.2135/cropsci1970.0011183x001000010012x

Other claims from this paper (15)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed viability was unaffected during the first two cycles.

Treatment
first two cyclese0
Outcome
seed viabilitye0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“seed viability was not affected during the first two cycles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–394

Title

Turnover of Glycerolipid Metabolite Pool and Seed Viability

Xiao-Long Hu; Xiao-Mei Yu; Hong-Ying Chen; et al. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2018. doi:10.3390/ijms19051417

Other claims from this paper (7)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pollen viability did not differ significantly among the four watermelon pollenizer cultivars.

Taxon
watermelonCitrullus lanatust0
Outcome
pollen viabilitye0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
cultivarse0

Verbatim

e0

“There were no significant differences in pollen viability among cultivars and all cultivars had high average viability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–829
t0

“Watermelon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–47

Title

Pollen Viability of Selected Diploid Watermelon Pollenizer Cultivars

Josh H. Freeman; Stephen M. Olson; Eileen A. Kabelka HortScience 2008. doi:10.21273/hortsci.43.1.274

Other claims from this paper (3)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Temperature and light did not affect tomato ovule viability.

Treatment
Temperature and lighte0
Outcome
ovule viabilitye0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Temperature and light did not affect ovule viability, although HTLI showed least ovule viability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1256–1353
t0

“in tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–107

Title

Effects of temperature and irradiance on stigma exsertion, ovule viability and embryo development in tomato

R. Fernandez-Muñoz; J. Cuartero Journal of Horticultural Science 1991. doi:10.1080/00221589.1991.11516167

Other claims from this paper (10)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rootstocks did not significantly affect pollen viability.

Taxon
Kinnowe1
Treatment
rootstockse0
Outcome
pollen viabilitye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“None of the rootstocks affects pollen viability significantly during the period of study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–718
e1

“Kinnow started flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–440

Title

Effect of ten rootstocks on flowering and pollen viability of Kinnow mandarin

Kuldeep Pandey; HS Rattanpal; Jagveer Singh International Journal of Chemical Studies 2020. doi:10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i2ag.9073

Other claims from this paper (5)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pollen viability was similar in both Plumeria species.

Taxon
PlumeriaPlumeriat0
Outcome
pollen viabilitye0
Direction
remained similare0

Verbatim

e0

“pollen viability remained similar for both”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1064
t0

“Plumeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 86–94

Title

Morphological Characterization, Pollen Viability, and Germinability Evaluation of Two Plumeria Species in the University of the Philippines Los Baños

Darel Kenth Antesco; Maria Charito Balladares; Alangelico San Pascual; et al. The Philippine Agricultural Scientist 2025. doi:10.62550/fd28036024

Other claims from this paper (12)
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed weight did not correlate with viability.

Taxon
Lechuguillat0
Organ / stage
seede0
Outcome
viabilitye0
Direction
no correlatione0

Verbatim

e0

“no correlation appeared between seed weight and viability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 932–989
t0

“Lechuguilla”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–41

Title

Some Germination Responses of Lechuguilla (Agave lecheguilla torr.)

C. E. Freeman The Southwestern Naturalist 1973. doi:10.2307/3670414

Other claims from this paper (13)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cleaning did not improve viability in Begonia accessions.

Taxon
BegoniaBegoniae0
Outcome
viabilitye0
Direction
no accessionse0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“no accessions of Begonia or Tagetes had improved viability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1584

Title

(210) X-ray-assisted Flower Seed Lot Improvement

Susan M. Stieve; David Tay HortScience 2006. doi:10.21273/hortsci.41.4.1070d

Other claims from this paper (11)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cleaning did not improve viability in Tagetes accessions.

Taxon
TagetesTagetese0
Outcome
viabilitye0
Direction
no accessionse0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“no accessions of Begonia or Tagetes had improved viability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1584

Title

(210) X-ray-assisted Flower Seed Lot Improvement

Susan M. Stieve; David Tay HortScience 2006. doi:10.21273/hortsci.41.4.1070d

Other claims from this paper (11)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.