Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“effective application method”

14 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

1970 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedpiece application of aldicarb is as effective as in-furrow application for Colorado potato beetle control

Taxon: white potatoe0
Treatment: seedpiece application method of aldicarbe6
Interactor: Colorado potato beetleLeptinotarsa decemlineatae6pest
Outcome: controle6
Direction: as effective ase6
Comparator: in‐furrow applicatione6

Verbatim

e0
“Field tests were conducted for 2 yr to determine the effectiveness of two methods of soil applications of aldicarb for control of Colorado potato beetle on white potato”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–667

e6
“The seedpiece application method of aldicarb is as effective as in‐furrow application for Colorado potato beetle control”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3493–3613

Title

A New Method of Soil Application of Aldicarb

G. M. Ghidiu; C. A. Storlie; W. F. Evans jpa 1995. doi:10.2134/jpa1995.0043

Other claims from this paper (5)

Intervention effect Aldicarb at 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 lb a.i./acre significantly reduced early season Colorado potato beetle larvae compared with untreated plots
Intervention effect Aldicarb at 1.0 and 2.0 lb a.i./acre reduced potato defoliation until early June with either application method
Intervention effect Aldicarb at 3.0 lb a.i./acre reduced potato defoliation through July
Intervention effect Aldicarb application rate did not significantly influence the number of larvae
Intervention effect Aldicarb application rate within a method did not influence potato tuber yield

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The method of cryoprotector application did not matter for Dracocephalum ruyschiana seed cryopreservation.

Taxon: Dracocephalum ruyschianaDracocephalum ruyschianae0
Treatment: method of their applicatione0
Outcome: effective cryopreservatione0
Direction: does not mattere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“for effective cryopreservation of Dracocephalum ruyschiana seed material, the use of cryoprotectors is justified; however, the method of their application does not matter”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–889

Title

Evaluation of the Dracocephalum ruyschiana L. and Salvia sclarea seed material cryopreservation effectiveness

A.Sh. Dodonova; A.V. Pavlov; N.D. Oreshkin; et al. Bulletin of the Karaganda University “Biology medicine geography Series” 2024. doi:10.31489/2024bmg3/86-94

Other claims from this paper (3)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The methods (soil or seed treatment) and time (pre or post sowing) of fungus application were equally effective.

Taxon: OKRAAbelmoschus esculentust0
Treatment: methods (soil/seed treatment) or time (pre/post - sowing) of fungus applicatione0
Outcome: equally effectivee0
Direction: equally effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0
“ON OKRA”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–104

e0
“The methods (soil/seed treatment) or time (pre/post - sowing) of fungus application were equally effective”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 365–471

Title

EFFECT OF PAECILOMYCES LILACINUS APPLIXATION TIME AND METHOD IN CONTROLLING MELOIDOGYNE JAVANICA ON OKRA

R. K. Walia; Ruchi Bansal; D. S. Bhatti Nematologia mediterranea 1991

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Fungus application in general resulted in better top growth of okra.
Intervention effect Wheat bran alone also promoted shoot length and fresh shoot weight, to a lesser extent than the fungus.
Intervention effect Root galling was significantly reduced in all fungus treatments.
Intervention effect Application of wheat bran alone failed to reduce root galling.
Intervention effect The time and method of fungus application were at par for gall reduction.
Intervention effect The fungus on wheat bran (WBF) proved better than carbofuran (1 kg a.i/ha) in gall suppression.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Split application and furrow fertilization were equally effective for bean yield.

Taxon: common beansPhaseolus vulgarise0
Treatment: split applicatione5
Outcome: equally effectivee5
Direction: no_changeinferrede5
Comparator: furrow fertilizatione5

Verbatim

e0
“The effect of rate and method of urea application on the yield of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L., cv. IPA-1)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–113

e5
“Sidedressed application of the total amount of urea resulted in the lowest yields, whereas split application and furrow fertilization were the best and equally effective methods”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1090

Title

Rates and methods of applying urea to common beans

J.C. Kiehl; R.I. Silveira; J. Brito Neto Scientia Agricola 1993. doi:10.1590/s0103-90161993000200013

Other claims from this paper (9)

Association Bean yield responses to nitrogen followed quadratic equations.
Association On the Red-Yellow Latosol, the yield response to nitrogen increased up to 66 kg N/ha.
Association On the Solodic Planosol, yield increased up to the highest applied rate of 90 kg N/ha.
Association The relative yield increase on the Red-Yellow Latosol site was 22%.
Association The relative yield increase on the Solodic Planosol site was 16%.
Intervention effect Sidedressed application of the total amount of urea gave the lowest bean yields compared with split application and furrow fertilization.
Intervention effect Split application of urea was among the best methods for bean yield compared with total sidedressing.
Intervention effect Furrow fertilization was among the best methods for bean yield compared with total sidedressing.
Intervention effect Mixing urea with the soil gave no significant bean yield increase.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined air-assisted and charged-droplet spraying did not effectively affect soybean yield versus conventional application.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment: Air-assisted spraying plus electrically charged dropletse0
Outcome: soybean yielde0
Direction: not effectivee0
Comparator: conventional application methode0

Verbatim

e0
“Air-assisted spraying plus electrically charged droplets, under the conditions of this experiment which corresponds to the application carried out in production areas, were not effective to affect whitefly control and soybean yield in comparison to the conventional application method”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1714

Title

Air‐assisted spraying and electrically charged droplets for Bemisia tabaci control in soybeans

Gabriela Pelegrini; Antônio M Souza; Pedro HU Ferreira; et al. Pest Management Science 2022. doi:10.1002/ps.7082

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Droplet electrification and air assistance did not change droplet size and uniformity.
Intervention effect Air assistance and charged droplets did not enhance surface coverage; maximum middle-third coverage was 4.55%.
Intervention effect Spray product deposition differences were not statistically significant.
Intervention effect The technologies reduced whitefly nymphs per leaflet from 10.9 to 3.0 in 2019/20, without a difference from untreated plants.
Intervention effect Whitefly nymph reduction was significant from the first assessment in 2020/21.
Intervention effect Combined air-assisted and charged-droplet spraying did not effectively affect whitefly control versus conventional application.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Liquid fertilizer at 50% of the recommended dose through drip irrigation produced yield equal to conventional irrigation and fertilizer application.

Taxon: okraAbelmoschus esculentust0
Treatment: 50% of recommended dose of liquid fertilizer through drip irrigatione0
Outcome: yielde0
Direction: equally effectivee0
Comparator: conventional method of irrigation and -,--- fertilizer applicatione0

Verbatim

e0
“50% of recommended dose of liquid fertilizer through drip irrigation was equally effective to produce yield that of conventional method of irrigation and -,--- fertilizer application.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–877

t0
“okra (Hibiscus esculentus)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–101

Title

Effect of liquid fertilizer through drip irrigation on growth and yield of okra (Hibiscus esculentus)

A.D. TUMBARE; B.N. SHINDE; S.U. BHOITE * . Indian Journal of Agronomy 2001. doi:10.59797/ija.v44i1.3485

Other claims from this paper (3)

Intervention effect Drip irrigation was superior to surface irrigation for okra.
Intervention effect Liquid fertilizer at 75% of the recommended dose through drip irrigation performed better and saved 25% fertilizer compared with conventional application.
Intervention effect Fertigation increased okra water-use efficiency.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined air-assisted and charged-droplet spraying did not effectively affect whitefly control versus conventional application.

Taxon: soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment: Air-assisted spraying plus electrically charged dropletse0
Interactor: Bemisia tabaciBemisia tabacit0pest
Outcome: whitefly controle0
Direction: not effectivee0
Comparator: conventional application methode0

Verbatim

e0
“Air-assisted spraying plus electrically charged droplets, under the conditions of this experiment which corresponds to the application carried out in production areas, were not effective to affect whitefly control and soybean yield in comparison to the conventional application method”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1714

t0
“Bemisia tabaci control in soybeans”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–94

Title

Air‐assisted spraying and electrically charged droplets for Bemisia tabaci control in soybeans

Gabriela Pelegrini; Antônio M Souza; Pedro HU Ferreira; et al. Pest Management Science 2022. doi:10.1002/ps.7082

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Droplet electrification and air assistance did not change droplet size and uniformity.
Intervention effect Air assistance and charged droplets did not enhance surface coverage; maximum middle-third coverage was 4.55%.
Intervention effect Spray product deposition differences were not statistically significant.
Intervention effect The technologies reduced whitefly nymphs per leaflet from 10.9 to 3.0 in 2019/20, without a difference from untreated plants.
Intervention effect Whitefly nymph reduction was significant from the first assessment in 2020/21.
Intervention effect Combined air-assisted and charged-droplet spraying did not effectively affect soybean yield versus conventional application.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of nitrogen application time and cultivar was not significant for the incidence of insect pests (except ear head bug).

Taxon: Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolort0
Treatment: their interactione0
Outcome: incidence of insect peste0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0
“Sorghum bicolor”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–98

e0
“Nitrogen application time and cultivars were significantly effective but their interaction was non-significantly effective for incidence of insect pest (exception of ear head bug)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–350

Title

Influence of Method and Application Time of Nitrogen on Pest Incidence of Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] Genotypes

Neelesh Raypuriya; R. K. Choudhary; P. Swathi; et al. International Journal of Bio-resource and Stress Management 2017. doi:10.23910/ijbsm/2017.8.3.1735

Other claims from this paper (16)

Intervention effect Nitrogen application time significantly affected the incidence of insect pests in sorghum (except ear head bug).
Intervention effect Sorghum cultivars differed significantly in the incidence of insect pests (except ear head bug).
Intervention effect Both nitrogen application time and cultivar and their interaction significantly affected sorghum growth parameters.
Intervention effect Cultivar CSV20 had significantly lower pest incidence than CSH16.
Intervention effect Cultivar CSV20 had higher growth parameters than CSH16.
Intervention effect Nitrogen schedule N1 (50% at sowing + 50% at 30 DAS) gave the maximum shoot fly incidence, 57.87% and 64.39% at 14 and 21 days.
Intervention effect Nitrogen schedule N1 gave the minimum stem borer dead hearts, 41.15% at 45 DAE.
Intervention effect Nitrogen schedule N1 gave low ear head pest numbers, 3.75 bugs and 3.0 worms at milk stage.
Intervention effect Nitrogen schedule N2 (50% at sowing + 25% at 30 DAS + 25% at boot leaf stage) gave the highest plant height, 182.33 cm.
Intervention effect Nitrogen schedule N3 (25% at sowing + 50% at 30 DAS + 25% at BLS) gave higher stem borer dead hearts, 51.42%.
Intervention effect Nitrogen schedule N4 (25% at sowing + 50% at 30 DAS + 15% at BLS + 10% at grain filling) gave maximum ear head pests, 6.78% and 4.27%.
Intervention effect Nitrogen schedule N5 (with 5% foliar spray at 45 DAS) gave the minimum shoot fly incidence, 43.85% and 51.12%.
Intervention effect Nitrogen schedule N4 gave the maximum number of grains per ear head, 2369.33 at grain filling stage.
Intervention effect Nitrogen schedule N5 also gave a high number of grains per ear head, 2111.17 at grain filling stage.
Intervention effect Nitrogen schedule N5 gave higher plot grain yield, 2.79 kg.
Intervention effect Nitrogen schedule N5 gave higher stover yield, 2.88 kg.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast preplant or sidedress application did not reduce squash yield when preplant broadcast preceded bedding.

Taxon: summer squashe0
Treatment: broadcast methode0
Outcome: yield losse0
Direction: No yield losse0
Qualifier: if the preplant broadcast application was made prior to the bedding operatione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“No yield loss resulted when the more cost-effective broadcast method was used for preplant or sidedress fertilizer application to summer squash if the preplant broadcast application was made prior to the bedding operation”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–757

Title

Broadcast vs. Band Fertilizer Applications on Summer Squash

Richard L. Parish; Regina P. Bracy; Joe E. McCoy Journal of Vegetable Crop Production 2000. doi:10.1300/j068v06n02_04

Other claims from this paper (3)

Intervention effect Sidedress fertilizer application method did not differ in yield.
Intervention effect Preplant application methods produced few yield differences.
Intervention effect Bed-and-broadcast preplant application tended toward lower yields.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield with Thiobencarb at 1.5 kg.ha was comparable to farmers method of two weeding.

Taxon: sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment: pre-emergence application of Thiobencarb at 1.5 kg.hae0
Outcome: seed yielde2
Direction: comparablee2
Comparator: farmers' method of two weedinge2

Verbatim

e0
“A field study on the effect of pre-einergence herbicides in rainfed sunflower showed that pre-emergence application of Thiobencarb at 1.5 kg.ha¹ was more effective in control of the weeds”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–187

e2
“was comparable with the seed yield obtained from farmers' method of two weeding”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–487

Title

EFFECT OF PRE-EMERGENCE HERBICIDES ON YIELD OF RAINFED SUNFLOWER

JEYARAMAN S Madras Agricultural Journal 1991. doi:10.29321/maj.10.a01867

Other claims from this paper (2)

Intervention effect Pre-emergence Thiobencarb at 1.5 kg/ha controlled weeds more effectively than other herbicides.
Intervention effect Thiobencarb at 1.5 kg.ha produced significantly higher sunflower seed yield than other herbicides.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“effective application method”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics