View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Planting space width had little effect on the canopy width and ecosystem service benefits of street trees.
Treatmentplanting space width e0 Outcomecanopy width and benefits e0 Directionno_change inferred e0 Qualifierlargely unaffected e0 Verbatim
t0 “The Effects Of Street Tree Site Planting Width On Canopy Width And Ability To Provide Ecosystem Services ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–104 e0 “it was found that both canopy width and benefits were largely unaffected by planting space width ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1041 Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Fibre width , lumen width and wall thickness differed little among populations.
Outcomefibre width, fibre lumen width and fibre wall thickness e0 Directionnot much difference e0 Verbatim
t0 “Acrocarpus fraxinifolius ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–84 e0 “There was not much difference in fibre width , fibre lumen width and fibre wall thickness. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–642 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Grain width and length- width ratio were not connected with flowering time.
Treatmenttime of blossom e4 Outcomewidth,length-width ratio of grains e4 Directionno_change inferred e4 Verbatim
t0 “Erect Rice Panicle and Curved Rice Panicle Cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–116 e4 “There have no connected between width ,length- width ratio of grains and the time of blossom ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1118 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
NPK levels did not significantly influence kernel width , thickness, or length-to- width ratio.
Treatmentdifferent NPK levels e0 Outcomekernel width, kernel thickness and length/width ratio e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “kernel width , kernel thickness and length/ width ratio were not significantly influenced by different NPK levels ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–525 e1 “fine rice, Basmati-385 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–207 Other claims from this paper (4) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Yield per plant was not significantly correlated with rachis length, rachis width and leaflet width in chickpea landraces.
Outcomerachis length, width and leaflets width e2 Directionno_change inferred e2 SettingDiyarbakir, Turkey e1 Verbatim
e0 “Ninety-four lines of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) landraces ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–60 e1 “on Experimental Farm of Faculty of Agriculture in Dicle University in Diyarbakir, Turkey in 2000 season ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–208 e2 “this characters were non-significantly correlated with seed length, width and roughness, rachis length, width and leaflets width ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–610 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Altitude did not affect leaf blade width , fibre length and fibre width .
Organ / stageleaf blade e2 Outcomeleaf blade width, fibre length, fibre width e2 Directiondid not affect e2 Verbatim
e0 “Morphological measurements of Anatolian chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) leaves were done within the borders of Abana district of Kastamonu province ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–148 e2 “It was found that altitude did not affect leaf blade width , fibre length, fibre width , felting ratio, and lumen width ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1011 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Kernel percentage, seed kernel-to-coat weight, length, width and length- width ratio did not differ significantly among clones.
Outcomekernel percent,seed kernel / coat weight,length,width and length- width ratio index e0 Directionnot significant e0 Verbatim
e0 “the differences among kernel percent,seed kernel / coat weight,length, width and length- width ratio index were not significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–404 t0 “Pinus koraiensis ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–95 Other claims from this paper (11) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
N2O fluxes were not influenced by the weed by width interaction or by width in soybean.
Treatmentweed by width interaction e0 Directionnot influenced e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “N 2 O fluxes were not influenced by the weed by width interaction or width before termination, after termination, or for the full duration of the study at P ≤ 0.05 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1396 t0 “Soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–86 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Storage root length, width and length/ width ratio did not vary with arsenic levels.
OutcomeStorage root length, width, and length/width ratio e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Two Sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas L.) Cultivars ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–164 e2 “Storage root length, width , and length/ width ratio did not vary with As levels ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 938–1016 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
No overall differences between male and female plants were found in synstigmatic width , synstylar width and single stigma length.
Outcomesynstigmatic width, synstylar width, single stigma length e0 DirectionNo overall differences e0 Comparatormale and female plants e1 Verbatim
e0 “No overall differences in synstigmatic width , synstylar width , single stigma length, synstigmatic area, and ovary width were found ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–1022 e1 “the flowers of male and female plants appearing identical ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 85–142 t0 “Rosa setigera ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–94 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.