View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
QoI or QoI + DMI fungicides gave greater southern rust control than DMI fungicides.
QoI or QoI + DMI fungicide e1 southern rust t0 pathogen southern rust control e1 DMI fungicides e1 Verbatim
t0 “Control of Southern Rust in Hybrid Corn in Arkansas ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 70–121 e1 “Applications that contained a QoI or QoI + DMI fungicide provided greater southern rust control than DMI fungicides ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–708 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
DMI fungicides had very little effect on clipping weights.
DMI fungicides e0 very little effect e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “there was very little effect from DMI fungicides ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–790 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Across both regions, DMI resistance in grapevine powdery mildew showed a strong relationship with the number of DMI fungicide applications over 10 years.
number of DMI fungicide applications over 10 years e5 increase inferred e5 Verbatim
t0 “grapevine powdery mildew (Erysiphe necator ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–58 e5 “For DMI s there was a strong relationship between number of DMI fungicide applications over 10 years and DMI resistance across all three DMI active ingredients in both regions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1031 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
DMI mutant isolates dominated mid-season.
DMI mutant isolates dominated mid-season e0 Not reported Taxon Direction
Verbatim
e0 “DMI mutant isolates dominated mid-season ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1539 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
DMI dehydratase had Km 5 microM for DMI .
Verbatim
t0 “alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–69 e0 “a Km value of 5 microM for DMI ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1285 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
DMI varied from 6.08% to 10.51%.
Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e0 “DMI ratios between 6.08% and 10.51% ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–948 t0 “MAIZE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–50 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cows grazing Simple forage had greater methane emissions, 28.7 CH4 g/kg DMI , than cows grazing monoculture oats at 22.6 CH4 g/kg DMI .
Methane emissions e0 22.6 CH4 g/kg DMI e0 monoculture oat treatment e0 Verbatim
e0 “Methane emissions were greatest (P = 0.04) for cows grazing Simple (28.7 CH4 g/kg DMI ) and Complex treatments (28.2 CH4 g/kg DMI ) compared with monoculture oat treatment (22.6 CH4 g/kg DMI ). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2250–2440 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect Simple forage yielded 4,053 kg/ha, without a significant difference from the other treatments. Intervention effect Complex forage yielded 4,245 kg/ha, without a significant difference from the other treatments. Intervention effect Simple forage had 14.76% crude protein at trial start, without significant treatment differences. Intervention effect Complex forage had 14.95% crude protein at trial start, without significant treatment differences. Intervention effect Simple forage had 71.51% total digestible nutrients at trial start, without significant treatment differences. Intervention effect Complex forage had 74.46% total digestible nutrients at trial start, without significant treatment differences. Intervention effect Simple forage had 13.9% crude protein at trial end, without significant treatment differences. Intervention effect Complex forage had 13.2% crude protein at trial end, without significant treatment differences. Intervention effect Simple forage had 69.9% total digestible nutrients at trial end, without significant treatment differences. Intervention effect Complex forage had 72.4% total digestible nutrients at trial end, without significant treatment differences. Intervention effect Cow body condition score and average daily gain did not differ significantly among forage treatments. Intervention effect Cow dry matter intake on Simple forage was 9.74 kg/d and did not differ significantly among treatments. Intervention effect Cow dry matter intake on Complex forage was 9.96 kg/d and did not differ significantly among treatments. Intervention effect Cows grazing Complex forage had greater methane emissions, 28.2 CH4 g/kg DMI, than cows grazing monoculture oats at 22.6 CH4 g/kg DMI. Recommendation Simple polycrop mixtures may be used as forage alternatives to monoculture oats because their biomass and nutritive value are adequate for gestating beef cows. Recommendation Complex polycrop mixtures may be used as forage alternatives to monoculture oats because their biomass and nutritive value are adequate for gestating beef cows. Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Cows grazing Complex forage had greater methane emissions, 28.2 CH4 g/kg DMI , than cows grazing monoculture oats at 22.6 CH4 g/kg DMI .
Complex treatments e0 Methane emissions e0 22.6 CH4 g/kg DMI e0 monoculture oat treatment e0 Verbatim
e0 “Methane emissions were greatest (P = 0.04) for cows grazing Simple (28.7 CH4 g/kg DMI ) and Complex treatments (28.2 CH4 g/kg DMI ) compared with monoculture oat treatment (22.6 CH4 g/kg DMI ). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2250–2440 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect Simple forage yielded 4,053 kg/ha, without a significant difference from the other treatments. Intervention effect Complex forage yielded 4,245 kg/ha, without a significant difference from the other treatments. Intervention effect Simple forage had 14.76% crude protein at trial start, without significant treatment differences. Intervention effect Complex forage had 14.95% crude protein at trial start, without significant treatment differences. Intervention effect Simple forage had 71.51% total digestible nutrients at trial start, without significant treatment differences. Intervention effect Complex forage had 74.46% total digestible nutrients at trial start, without significant treatment differences. Intervention effect Simple forage had 13.9% crude protein at trial end, without significant treatment differences. Intervention effect Complex forage had 13.2% crude protein at trial end, without significant treatment differences. Intervention effect Simple forage had 69.9% total digestible nutrients at trial end, without significant treatment differences. Intervention effect Complex forage had 72.4% total digestible nutrients at trial end, without significant treatment differences. Intervention effect Cow body condition score and average daily gain did not differ significantly among forage treatments. Intervention effect Cow dry matter intake on Simple forage was 9.74 kg/d and did not differ significantly among treatments. Intervention effect Cow dry matter intake on Complex forage was 9.96 kg/d and did not differ significantly among treatments. Intervention effect Cows grazing Simple forage had greater methane emissions, 28.7 CH4 g/kg DMI, than cows grazing monoculture oats at 22.6 CH4 g/kg DMI. Recommendation Simple polycrop mixtures may be used as forage alternatives to monoculture oats because their biomass and nutritive value are adequate for gestating beef cows. Recommendation Complex polycrop mixtures may be used as forage alternatives to monoculture oats because their biomass and nutritive value are adequate for gestating beef cows. Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
DMI resistant isolates carried Y136F.
genetic mutations to DMI (Y136F) e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “Resistant isolates carried the genetic mutations to DMI (Y136F) and QoI (G143A). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1190 Other claims from this paper (7) Method / resource observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Predicted DMI was lower than achieved DMI for three of the four tested bermudagrass hays
for three of the four hays e1 Verbatim
e0 “Thirty-two bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.] samples ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–61 e1 “Predicted DMI was lower (P<.05) than achieved for three of the four hays ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–846 Other claims from this paper (3) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Zea mays subsp. mays
Vitis
Erysiphe necator
Medicago sativa
Zea mays
Bos taurus
Cynodon dactylon