View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Method / resource observed original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
FLORSYS is described as the first weed model simulating competition for light , water and nitrogen .
Outcomecompetition for light, water and nitrogen e0 Comparatorfirst weed model e0 Verbatim
e0 “The FLORSYS becomes the first weed model to simulate competition for light , water and nitrogen ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 138–232 t0 “crop/weed interactions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–154 Mechanism author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Compensatory growth after early water logging results from diminished interplant competition for nitrogen , water and light .
Outcomecompensatory growth e4 Qualifierdiminished interplant competition for nitrogen, water and light e4 Verbatim
t0 “Effects of single and multiple water loggings on the growth and yield of winter wheat on a clay soil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–99 e4 “Subsequently, compensatory growth resulted from diminished interplant competition for nitrogen , water and light : a greater proportion of tillers survived and the flag leaves were larger, although ears at harvest were fewer in all treatments water logged before emergence ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1140 Other claims from this paper (11) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The negative effects of biosolids on broom are suggested to be due to increased competition from other plants for light and water .
Outcomenegative effects of biosolids on broom e0 Qualifierincreased competition from other plants for light and water e0 Verbatim
e0 “This suggests that the negative effects of biosolids on broom are due to increased competition from other plants for light and water ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2314–2446 Other claims from this paper (12) Mechanism author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
There was evidence of competition for nitrogen by grasses, which could not be separated from competition for water .
Outcomecompetition for nitrogen e5 Qualifiercould not be separated from that of competition for water e5 Verbatim
e0 “We examined morphological and physiological responses of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) seedlings to grass-induced below ground competition in full- light conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–160 e5 “There was evidence of competition for nitrogen (N) by grasses, but its effect on seedling development could not be separated from that of competition for water ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–978 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Interspecific competition intensity for light and soil water decreased from 2018 to 2019.
Outcomeinterspecific competition intensity for light and soil water e1 Settingfrom 2018 to 2019 e1 Verbatim
t0 “apple–soybean alley cropping system ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–126 e1 “The interspecific competition intensity for light and soil water decreased from 2018 to 2019, while root and soil nitrate nitrogen (NN) increased ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1301 Other claims from this paper (9) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Authors suggest nitrogen competition mediated the vine effect on tree growth.
Qualifiercompetition for nitrogen e0 Verbatim
e0 “competition for nitrogen mediated the effects of belowground competition of vines on tree growth. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1318 t0 “Liquidambar styraciflua ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–113 Other claims from this paper (5) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The authors interpreted nitrogen competition as mediating effects of vines on tree growth.
Qualifiercompetition for nitrogen e0 Verbatim
e0 “competition for nitrogen mediated the effects of belowground competition of vines on tree growth ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1318 t0 “LIQUIDAMBAR STYRACIFLUA ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–113 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result positive basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
STICS was improved to account for aluminum toxicity, water excess and crop–weed competition .
Outcomeimproved for the specific purpose of the study e0 QualifierAluminum toxicity, water excess and competition between crop and weeds for light, water and nitrogen e0 Not reported Comparator Value
Verbatim
e0 “STICS, an existing crop model, had to be improved for the specific purpose of the study, in order to take into account Aluminum toxicity, water excess and competition between crop and weeds for light , water and nitrogen ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–742 e1 “case study on maize in small-scale farms of central Brazil ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–168 Other claims from this paper (3) Mechanism author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The authors attributed better miscanthus development with melilot to stronger competition in woad intercrops and melilot nitrogen fixation.
Outcomedeveloped better e1 Qualifierstronger competition for water, nutrients, and light in WAM and (ii) nitrogen fixation advantage in melilot e0 Verbatim
e0 “stronger competition for water , nutrients, and light in WAM and (ii) nitrogen fixation advantage in melilot ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1093 e1 “The miscanthus developed better in YAM than WAM. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–953 t0 “Miscanthus (Miscanthus × giganteus Greef et Deuter) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–91 Other claims from this paper (8) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Increasing plant density negatively affected ajowan traits through competition for resources.
Treatmentincreasing the plant density e0 Outcometraits of ajowan e0 Directionnegative effect e0 Qualifierinterspecific competition for light, nutrients, water and other resources e0 Verbatim
e0 “increasing the plant density with enhancing the interspecific competition for light , nutrients, water and other resources, had negative effect on traits of ajowan. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3829–3992 Other claims from this paper (8) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.