Try:droughtFusariumnitrogen fertilizerArabidopsisseed germination

“nitrogen fertilizer”

2,659 matches

Claim types

Direction of the findings

plus 298 non-evaluative

Over time

1950 ’60 ’70 ’80 ’90 2000 ’10 ’20

Refine ·

More filters

Clear filters

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying peanut rhizobia with nitrogen fertilizer did not significantly increase pod yield relative to nitrogen fertilizer application.

Taxon: peanutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment: applying of peanut rhizobia and nitrogen fertilizere0
Interactor: peanut rhizobiae0symbiont
Outcome: yield of pode0
Comparator: application of nitrogen fertilizere0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“Compared with application of nitrogen fertilizer,the applying of peanut rhizobia and nitrogen fertilizer had no significant effect on increasing yield of pod”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–953

Title

Study on Factors Affecting Nitrogen Utilization and Technical Standards of Retrenching-nitrogen Cultivation in Peanut

Wang Cai-bin Journal of Peanut Science 2011

Other claims from this paper (19)

Observation Nitrogen utilization differed significantly among peanut varieties.
Observation Soil-derived nitrogen accounted for 51.9%～73.7% of peanut nitrogen.
Observation Jin’an had the highest proportion of nitrogen absorbed from soil among the compared peanut varieties.
Observation Weihua 8 had the lowest proportion of nitrogen absorbed from soil.
Observation Nodule-fixed nitrogen accounted for 10.5%～37.4%.
Observation 3-XC135 had a higher proportion of nitrogen fixed by nodules.
Observation Weihua 8 had a higher proportion of nitrogen fixed by nodules.
Observation Jin’an had the lowest proportion of nodule-fixed nitrogen.
Observation Fertilizer-derived nitrogen accounted for 10.8%～15.2%.
Observation Penglaixiaolipihong had the highest fertilizer-derived nitrogen proportion.
Observation 3-XC128 had the lowest fertilizer-derived nitrogen proportion.
Intervention effect Without nitrogen fertilizer, peanut rhizobia application markedly increased pod yield.
Intervention effect Peanut rhizobia with nitrogen fertilizer increased nitrogen fixation.
Intervention effect Rhizobia plus organic fertilizer increased nodule number and nodule weight.
Intervention effect Rhizobia plus ammonium molybdate increased nodule number and weight.
Intervention effect Rhizobia plus organic fertilizer markedly increased pod yield.
Intervention effect Rhizobia plus ammonium molybdate markedly increased pod yield.
Intervention effect Amidonitrogen increased peanut root length, root surface area, nitrogen accumulation and fixation.
Intervention effect NO3——N and NH4+-N+NO3——N showed no obvious advantage for root growth or nitrogen fixation.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen rate and timing did not significantly alter fertilizer nitrogen leaching depth.

Taxon: WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: Nitrogen rate and timingt0
Outcome: depth of fertilizer nitrogen leachinge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0
“but did not contribute significantly to the depth of fertilizer nitrogen leaching”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–763

t0
“Nitrogen Fertilizer Movement in the Soil as Influenced by Nitrogen Rate and Timing in Wheat Production, 1991”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–108

Title

Nitrogen Fertilizer Movement in the Soil as Influenced by Nitrogen Rate and Timing in Wheat Production, 1991

Michael J. Ottman; N. Vigorito UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) 1994

Other claims from this paper (5)

Association Crop water use increased with nitrogen rate due to vegetative growth.
Association Excess water applied increased as nitrogen rate decreased.
Observation Soil bromide suggested a maximum potential leaching depth of 3 to 6 feet.
Observation Most fertilizer was recovered in the top 2 to 3 feet of soil.
Intervention effect Nitrogen rate and timing caused some differences in soil and plant recovery of labeled fertilizer.

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant genotype by nitrogen fertilizer interaction was detected.

Treatment: N fertilizere0
Outcome: genotype × N fertilizer interactionse0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0
“No significant genotype × N fertilizer interactions were detected”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–824

t0
“COMMON BEAN (Phaseolus vulgaris)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–90

Title

EFFECT OF NITROGEN FERTILIZER ON NITROGEN ACCUMULATION BY COMMON BEAN (Phaseolus vulgaris)

M. Mera; J. Nienhuis; K.A. Kmiecik HortScience 1993. doi:10.21273/hortsci.28.5.532b

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Each nitrogen increment increased accumulated nitrogen in every genotype.
Observation Puebla 152 accumulated 25% more nitrogen than Eagle in 1991.
Observation Puebla 152 accumulated 46% more nitrogen than Clay in 1991.
Observation Puebla 152 accumulated 53% more nitrogen than Eagle in 1992.
Observation Puebla 152 accumulated 119% more nitrogen than Clay in 1992.
Observation Puebla 152 accumulated 119% more nitrogen than Nod 125 in 1992.

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon and nitrogen fertilizer did not significantly interact for SPAD.

Treatment: ethephon and nitrogen fertilizere0
Outcome: SPAD valuee0
Direction: no significant interactione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0
“there was no significant interaction between ethephon and nitrogen fertilizer on SPAD value”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1326

Title

Effect of Ethephon and Nitrogen Fertilizer on Nitrogen Uptake, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Yield of Summer Maize

De-Lian YE; Yu-Bin WANG; Lin ZHOU; et al. ACTA AGRONOMICA SINICA 2015. doi:10.3724/sp.j.1006.2015.01701

Other claims from this paper (14)

Intervention effect Ethephon significantly reduced maize nitrogen uptake and uptake efficiency.
Intervention effect Ethephon increased nitrogen utilization efficiency.
Intervention effect Ethephon increased nitrogen agronomic efficiency by 32.7 to 34.6 percent.
Intervention effect Ethephon had no negative effect on yield and yield components.
Intervention effect Greater nitrogen fertilizer increased maize yield and yield components.
Intervention effect Greater nitrogen fertilizer increased nitrogen uptake.
Intervention effect Greater nitrogen fertilizer reduced four nitrogen efficiency measures.
Intervention effect Nitrogen uptake at 225 kg nitrogen exceeded that at zero nitrogen by 68.4 to 91.8 percent.
Intervention effect Nitrogen uptake did not differ between 225 and 150 kg nitrogen treatments.
Association The ethephon by nitrogen interaction significantly affected nitrogen uptake, uptake efficiency and agronomic efficiency.
Intervention effect Ethephon increased ear leaf SPAD during grain filling.
Intervention effect Higher nitrogen rate increased ear leaf SPAD during grain filling.
Association Maize yield was positively correlated with nitrogen uptake at silking and harvest.
Association Maize yield was positively correlated with ear leaf SPAD.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield with 50% nitrogen plus Azotobacter was not significantly different from 100% nitrogen fertilizer.

Treatment: 50% nitrogen chemical fertilizer with Azotobactere0
Outcome: seed yielde0
Direction: not significantly differente0
Comparator: 100% nitrogen fertilizer applicatione0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0
“combined application of 50% nitrogen chemical fertilizer with Azotobacter in terms of seed yield was not significantly different from the treatment of 100% nitrogen fertilizer application”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1446

Title

Evaluation Effect of Chemical and Biological Fertilizer on Nitrogen Efficiency Indexes of Safflower Genotypes under Rain fed Condition

Abas Solymanifard Journal of Crop Nutrition Science 2020

Other claims from this paper (3)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer produced no significant response overall.

Taxon: grass seedlingst0
Treatment: Nitrogen fertilizere0
Outcome: responsese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0
“grass seedlings”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–73

e0
“Nitrogen fertilizer produced no significant responses”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–751

Title

Importance of phosphorus and nitrogen in the nutrition of grass seedlings growing in mulga soil

RG Silcock; A Noble; RDB Whalley Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 1976. doi:10.1071/ar9760583

Other claims from this paper (8)

Observation Digitaria and the two exotic grasses responded similarly to phosphorus.
Observation Cenchrus used soil nitrogen more readily than the other grasses.
Intervention effect Phosphorus markedly increased grass seedling growth.
Intervention effect Phosphorus increased plant nitrogen and phosphorus content.
Intervention effect Phosphorus shortened the interval between emergence and tillering.
Intervention effect Phosphorus reduced root to shoot ratios.
Intervention effect Nitrogen fertilizer retarded very early seedling growth.
Association Nitrogen and phosphorus had no interaction.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reducing nitrogen fertilizer had no significant effect on vegetable nitrogen uptake and yield.

Taxon: vegetablee2
Treatment: reduction in nitrogen fertilizer application ratee0
Outcome: nitrogen uptake and yielde1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0
“Appropriate reduction in nitrogen fertilizer application rate”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1164

e1
“while it has no significant effect on the nitrogen uptake and yield.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1419–1487

e2
“greenhouse vegetable production (GVP)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 45–82

Title

Response of Nitrogen Losses to Excessive Nitrogen Fertilizer Application in Intensive Greenhouse Vegetable Production

Hui Zhao; Xuyong Li; Yan Jiang Sustainability 2019. doi:10.3390/su11061513

Other claims from this paper (17)

Intervention effect Excessive nitrogen fertilizer increased nitrate leaching by 187.5%.
Intervention effect Excessive nitrogen fertilizer increased ammonium leaching by 28.1%.
Intervention effect Excessive nitrogen fertilizer increased total nitrogen leaching by 217.0%.
Intervention effect Excessive nitrogen fertilizer increased nitrous oxide emission by 202.0%.
Intervention effect Excessive nitrogen fertilizer increased ammonia emission by 176.4%.
Intervention effect Excessive nitrogen fertilizer increased nitric oxide emission by 543.3%.
Intervention effect Excessive nitrogen fertilizer increased vegetable yield by 35.7%.
Intervention effect Excessive nitrogen fertilizer increased vegetable nitrogen uptake by 24.5%.
Association Nitrate leaching was severe above 570 kg N/ha fertilizer application.
Association Nitrous oxide emission was severe above the reported threshold of 733 kg/N.
Association Fertilizer effects on yield growth decreased above 302 kg N/ha.
Intervention effect Reducing nitrogen fertilizer decreased nitrate leaching by 32.4%.
Intervention effect Reducing nitrogen fertilizer decreased ammonium leaching by 6.5%.
Intervention effect Reducing nitrogen fertilizer decreased total nitrogen leaching by 37.3%.
Intervention effect Reducing nitrogen fertilizer decreased ammonia emission by 28.4%.
Intervention effect Reducing nitrogen fertilizer decreased nitrous oxide emission by 38.6%.
Intervention effect Reducing nitrogen fertilizer decreased nitric oxide emission by 8.0%.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant nitrogen accumulation did not differ significantly among nitrogen fertilizer treatments.

Treatment: applying nitrogen fertilizere0
Outcome: N accumulatione0
Direction: no significant differencee0
Comparator: treatmentse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0
“the amount of N accumulation in plant have no significant difference between treatments with applying nitrogen fertilizer”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 656–777

Title

Effect of Nitrogen Rate and Ratio of Base and Topdressing Fertilizer on Yield,Quality and Fertilizer-N Use Efficiency in Wheat Cultivar Jimai 20

Yu Zhenwen Mailei zuowu xuebao 2010

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect Topdressing had higher fertilizer nitrogen use efficiency than basal nitrogen.
Intervention effect Reducing basal nitrogen while increasing topdressing nitrogen enhanced fertilizer nitrogen use efficiency.
Observation N2 had the highest fertilizer nitrogen use efficiency.
Intervention effect Treatments N2, N5 and N6 increased wheat grain yield.
Intervention effect Treatments N2, N5 and N6 increased wheat grain protein content.
Intervention effect Treatments N2, N5 and N6 improved grain processing quality.
Recommendation The authors recommended N2 at 168 kg/hm2 and a 1∶2 base to topdressing ratio.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application rate did not significantly alter fertilizer nitrogen distribution through the soil–crop–cow system.

Taxon: forage triticalee0
Treatment: N fertilizert0
Outcome: distribution rate of N fertilizere0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0
“it did not significantly affect the distribution rate of N fertilizer in the soil–forage triticale–dairy cow system”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1383

t0
“Nitrogen Fertilizer”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 25–44

Title

Quantifying the Flows of Nitrogen Fertilizer under Different Application Rates in a Soil–Forage Triticale–Dairy Cow System

Yongliang You; Guibo Liu; Xianlong Yang; et al. Agronomy 2023. doi:10.3390/agronomy13123073

Other claims from this paper (10)

Observation Forage triticale absorbed 34.1–37.3% of applied fertilizer nitrogen.
Observation Stems contained 35.9–39.6% of the nitrogen absorbed by triticale.
Observation Leaves contained 60.4–64.1% of absorbed nitrogen.
Observation The 0–100 cm soil layer retained 36.3–39.1% of applied fertilizer nitrogen.
Observation Of soil-retained nitrogen, 81.8–91.3% was in the upper 0–40 cm.
Observation Losses accounted for 24.6–26.8% of applied fertilizer nitrogen.
Observation Dairy cows could utilize 28.1–31.3% of fertilizer nitrogen.
Intervention effect Increasing nitrogen fertilizer from 0 to 225 kg N ha−1 raised forage biomass yield from 14.0 to 17.5 t ha−1.
Intervention effect Increasing fertilizer nitrogen raised forage triticale nitrogen content from 1.3% to 1.4%.
Recommendation The authors recommend less than 225 kg N ha–1 for efficient nitrogen use and reduced environmental risk.

Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The relation between 100-seed weight and nitrogen fertilizer was not significant.

Treatment: nitrogen fertilizere0
Outcome: weight of 100 seedse0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0
“the relation between the weight of 100 seeds and nitrogen fertilizer was not significant”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–484

Title

Effect of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Yield and Quality of Vegetable Soybean

Weiping Huang Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University 2007

Other claims from this paper (12)

Association Stem thickness rose with nitrogen fertilizer.
Association Nodes declined with nitrogen fertilizer.
Association Branch length and plant height increased with nitrogen fertilizer.
Association Pods and seeds per plant increased with nitrogen fertilizer.
Association Branch number first rose then fell with fertilizer.
Association Protein content first rose then fell.
Association Starch and protein content had a significant opposite relation.
Association Soluble sugar content first rose then fell.
Observation Yield and quality were highest at 90 kg/hm2 nitrogen.
Observation Fresh yield was 13 652.55 kg/hm2 at 90 kg/hm2 nitrogen.
Observation Soluble sugar content was 68.85 mg/g at 90 kg/hm2 nitrogen.
Observation Protein content was 39.11% at 90 kg/hm2 nitrogen.

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.

“nitrogen fertilizer”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics