Refine

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Observationauthor interpretationreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Corn silage hybrids have nutritional differences that rival differences among other species.

Taxon
corn silagee0
Outcome
nutritional differencese0

Verbatim

e0

“corn silage hybrid differences that rival other species in nutritional differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–332

Title

SILAGE QUALITY: HOW IS IT DEFINED AND MEASURED?

K.E. Nestor 2010

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutritional quality showed no consistent differences.

Taxon
foragest0
Outcome
nutritional qualitye0
Direction
no consistent differencese0

Verbatim

e0

“with no consistent differences in nutritional quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 290–343
t0

“forages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–21

Title

Summer annual forages in south central Kansas

William F. Heer; Dale A. Blasi; Dale L. Fjell Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports 1993. doi:10.4148/2378-5977.2105

Other claims from this paper (6)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Overall nutritional differences among mulches were small.

Outcome
nutritional differencese0
Qualifier
smalle0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Overall, the nutritional differences among mulch treatments were small, suggesting that growth differences were attributed to other factors.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–797
t0

“Pecan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67

Title

Organic Mulches Affect Soil and Leaf Nutrient Levels of Young Pecan Trees

Wheeler G. Foshee; William D. Goff; Michael G. Patterson; et al. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry 1999. doi:10.48044/jauf.1999.012

Other claims from this paper (5)
Mechanismauthor interpretationreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Nutritional differences were proposed as the main reason for clonal rooting differences.

Outcome
differencese0
Qualifier
mainly nutritionale0

Verbatim

e0

“the causes of the differences being mainly nutritional.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 308–363
t0

“of cacao (Theobroma cacao L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–62

Title

Review of vegetative propagation of cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) by rooted cuttings. 1. Physiological considerations

F M Amoah Ghana Journal of Agricultural Science 2007. doi:10.4314/gjas.v39i2.2144

Other claims from this paper (12)
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil physicochemical differences corresponded to pepper fruit nutritional quality differences.

Taxon
peppere0
Outcome
nutritional quality of pepper fruitse0
Setting
soilse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“physicochemical properties of the soils were significantly different, which led to differences in the nutritional quality of pepper fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 231–369

Title

Effects of Soil Type on Trace Element Absorption and Fruit Quality of Pepper

Zhoubin Liu; Yu Huang; Fangjun Tan; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2021. doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.698796

Other claims from this paper (5)
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutritional indices suggested marginal differences in overall nutritional value among production types for carrot and tomato, without demonstrated statistical significance.

Outcome
overall nutritional valuee0
Qualifier
at least marginal differencese0
Comparator
typese0

Verbatim

e0

“nutritional indices suggest at least marginal differences across types regarding the overall nutritional value of carrot and tomato across types”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1687–1831
e1

“it cannot be stated that such differences are statistically significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1870–1941

Title

LCA and nutritional assessment of southern Benin market vegetable gardening across the production continuum

Angel Avadí; Nounagnon Richard Hodomihou; Guillaume Lucien Amadji; et al. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 2021. doi:10.1007/s11367-021-01977-z

Other claims from this paper (9)
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The samples showed significant similarities and differences in nutritional composition.

Outcome
nutritional compositione0
Direction
similarities and differencese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“new insights regarding the nutritional composition of the samples, while also highlighting significant similarities and differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1077
t0

“Ficus carica L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–92

Title

Lipidomic profiling reveals phenotypic diversity and nutritional benefits in Ficus carica L. (Fig.) seed cultivars

Ahmed Irchad; Rachida Ouaabou; Rachid Aboutayeb; et al. Frontiers in Plant Science 2023. doi:10.3389/fpls.2023.1229994

Other claims from this paper (5)
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutritional differences generally did not greatly affect amino acid distribution.

Treatment
nutritional differencese0
Outcome
amino-acid distributione0
Direction
not greatly affectede0

Verbatim

e0

“In general, the amino-acid distribution is not greatly affected by nutritional differences”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 262–352
e7

“barley leaves at different stages of development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 69–117

Title

Physiological Studies in Plant Nutrition

F. J. RICHARDS; E. BERNER Annals of Botany 1954. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a083379

Other claims from this paper (12)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutritional quality measures showed no major differences between the legumes.

Taxon
legumese0
Outcome
several measures of nutritional qualitye0
Direction
No major differencese0

Verbatim

e0

“No major differences between the legumes were found in several measures of nutritional quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–780

Title

Winter growth and nutritive quality of serradella ( Ornithopus spp.)

RC Rossiter; WJ Collins; L Klein Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 1985. doi:10.1071/ea9850362

Other claims from this paper (3)
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No significant differences occurred in other nutritional parameters of wheat kernel between variants.

Outcome
other nutritional parameterse4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4

Verbatim

e0

“nutritional characteristics of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 166–202
e4

“There were no significant differences in other nutritional parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1048

Title

Effect of Foliar Copper-Containing Superabsorbent Polymers on Nutritional Characteristics and Mycotoxin Contamination of Wheat Kernel

Ivana Kolackova; Hana Abigail Gruberova; Ondrej Kratochvil; et al. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 2021. doi:10.11118/actaun.2021.007

Other claims from this paper (6)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.