Refine

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics

More filters

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Robot picking tripled efficiency relative to manual picking.

Outcome
efficiencye0
Direction
triplinge0
Value
triplinge0
Comparator
manual pickinge0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“tripling the efficiency compared to manual picking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–966

Title

Intelligent picking robot for orchard based on visual recognition

C. Lei; C. Lei; H. Liu; et al. IET conference proceedings. 2023. doi:10.1049/icp.2023.2962

Other claims from this paper (2)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Picking efficiency at first picking was 96.35 %, lower than third picking.

Organ / stage
first pickinge0
Outcome
picking efficiencye0
Direction
lesse0
Value
96.35 %e0

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52
e0

“picking efficiency was less in first picking (96.35 %) and more in third picking (97.48%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–834

Title

Development and Evaliation of Trolley Mounted Cotton Picker

MUTHAMILSELVEN M; RANGASAMY K; DIVAKER DURAIRAJ C Madras Agricultural Journal 2004. doi:10.29321/maj.10.a00129

Other claims from this paper (8)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Picking efficiency at third picking was 97.48%, higher than first picking.

Organ / stage
third pickinge0
Outcome
picking efficiencye0
Direction
moree0
Value
97.48%e0

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–52
e0

“picking efficiency was less in first picking (96.35 %) and more in third picking (97.48%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–834

Title

Development and Evaliation of Trolley Mounted Cotton Picker

MUTHAMILSELVEN M; RANGASAMY K; DIVAKER DURAIRAJ C Madras Agricultural Journal 2004. doi:10.29321/maj.10.a00129

Other claims from this paper (8)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical blueberry picking had high efficiency relative to manual picking.

Taxon
blueberrye0
Outcome
efficiency of mechanical pickinge0
Direction
highe0
Comparator
manual pickinge0

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with that of manual picking, efficiency of mechanical picking is high, which meets technical requirements of blueberry machinery.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1274

Title

Design and Experiment of Hand-Push Vibration Picking Machine of Lowbush Blueberry

Yu Dong Bao; Yan Ling Guo Key engineering materials 2014. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.620.375

Other claims from this paper (3)
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The pear picking robot shows high picking efficiency and accuracy in the experiment.

Taxon
fragrant pearse0
Outcome
picking efficiency and accuracye5

Verbatim

e0

“the process of picking fragrant pears”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 292–329
e5

“the pear picking robot shows high picking efficiency and accuracy in the experiment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1464

Title

Visual Servo Control Algorithm and Path Planning Optimization of Pear Picking Robot

Peng Zhou; Bingyu Cao; Wei Chen; et al. 2024 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Robot Systems (AIARS) 2024. doi:10.1109/aiars63200.2024.00050

Other claims from this paper (5)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Simplifying the hand picking motion does not increase picking efficiency significantly.

Taxon
Processing Tomatot0
Treatment
Simplification of the hand picking motione0
Outcome
picking efficiencye0
Direction
does not increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Processing Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–74
e0

“Simplification of the hand picking motion (therblig), does not increase picking efficiency significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1356–1460

Title

Studies on the Development of a Mechanical Harvester for Processing Tomato

Hiroshi ARIMA Japanese Journal of Farm Work Research 1979. doi:10.4035/jsfwr.1979.36_1

Other claims from this paper (4)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The device improved picking work efficiency.

Outcome
work efficiencye0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“improve work efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 767–790
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–15

Title

Design of Mango Picking Machine

Hao He Anhui nongye kexue 2012

Other claims from this paper (3)
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The strawberry robot improved picking efficiency and accuracy.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Outcome
efficiency and accuracy of strawberry pickinge0

Verbatim

e0

“improve the efficiency and accuracy of strawberry picking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–788

Title

Design of Strawberry Picking Hybrid Robot Based on Kinect Sensor

Liu Qiong; Cao Changyong; Zhang Xiaodong; et al. 2018 International Conference on Sensing,Diagnostics, Prognostics, and Control (SDPC) 2018. doi:10.1109/sdpc.2018.8665004

Other claims from this paper (1)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Picking subregions and obstacle avoidance were combined in path planning to improve picking efficiency.

Outcome
overall efficiency of tomato pickinge0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedValue

Verbatim

e0

“The tomato picking space is divided into multiple picking sub-regions, and the picking path planning is combined with the obstacle avoidance algorithm to improve the overall efficiency of tomato picking.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–953

Title

Design of Vision Control System of Tomato Picking Robot

Chuangxin He; Chunyu Deng; Nan Li; et al. 2021 40th Chinese Control Conference (CCC) 2021. doi:10.23919/ccc52363.2021.9549364

Other claims from this paper (2)
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanized picking efficiency was 30.28 kg/h, 6.65 times that of manual picking.

Outcome
mechanized picking efficiencye0
Value
30.28 kg/he0
Comparator
manual pickinge0

Verbatim

e0

“mechanized picking efficiency was 30.28 kg/h, which is 6.65 times that of manual picking”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2121–2209

Title

Mechanism and experimental study on the fruit detachment of Chinese wolfberry through reciprocating vibration

Mei Song; Wang Jinpeng; Song Zhiyu; et al. International journal of agricultural and biological engineering 2024. doi:10.25165/j.ijabe.20241702.8482

Other claims from this paper (6)

Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.