Search claims · PlantClaims

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application rates had no significant effect on rhizosphere bacterial community measures.

Taxon: Annual ryegrasse1
Treatment: application ratese0
Outcome: effecte0
Direction: no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“while application rates had no significant effect”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1177

e1
“Annual ryegrass growth”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–528

Title

Nutrient recovery from anaerobic digestion of food waste: impacts of digestate on plant growth and rhizosphere bacterial community composition and potential function in ryegrass

Ai-Tian Ren; Lynette K. Abbott; Yinglong Chen; et al. Biology and Fertility of Soils 2020. doi:10.1007/s00374-020-01477-6

Other claims from this paper (8)

Intervention effect Digestate significantly increased annual ryegrass growth.
Intervention effect Liquid urea ammonium nitrate significantly increased annual ryegrass growth.
Intervention effect Digestate was as effective as liquid urea ammonium nitrate for ryegrass growth.
Intervention effect Digestate at 50 kg N ha −1 significantly increased AM fungal hyphae density.
Intervention effect Liquid urea ammonium nitrate at 50 kg N ha −1 significantly reduced AM fungal hyphae density versus 25 kg N ha −1 at DAE 75.
Intervention effect Digestate significantly shifted rhizosphere bacterial community composition, OTU richness, and C and N cycling gene abundance.
Intervention effect Liquid urea ammonium nitrate significantly shifted rhizosphere bacterial community composition and OTU richness.
Recommendation The authors concluded digestate may have less impact on soil microflora diversity and function than conventional fertilizers.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

There were no significant differences among treatments in bulb diameter and percent recovery.

Taxon: Scallion Green Oniont0
Outcome: diameter of bulb and percent recoverye0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0
“Scallion Green Onion”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–62

e0
“Non-significant differences among treatments were noted in the number of leaves, number of tillers, diameter of bulb and percent recovery”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1037

Title

Growth and Yield Performance of “Sakurab” Scallion Green Onion (Allium Fistulusom L.) Under Different Rates of Chicken Dung and Sources of Soil Amendment

Rashdi Macalangcom Casim IAR Journal of Agriculture Research and Life Sciences 2021. doi:10.47310/iarjals.2021.v02i01.009

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ulva extracts did not significantly change tomato seedling emergence rates.

Taxon: tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
Treatment: U. lactucae3
Outcome: seedling emergence ratese2
Direction: No significant differencee2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2
“No significant difference in seedling emergence rates were seen”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–976

e3
“The germination recovery of aged seeds after the application of U. lactuca was evaluated by seed germination rates and seedling emergence”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 345–482

t0
“tomato germination”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–67

Title

Effects of extracts of two Ulva spp. seaweeds on tomato germination and seedling growth

Renata Perpetuo Reis; Antônio Carlos Silva de Andrade; Ana Carolina Calheiros; et al. Research Society and Development 2020. doi:10.33448/rsd-v9i11.10174

Other claims from this paper (3)

Intervention effect Ulva lactuca ulvan and flour increased germination rates of aged tomato seeds compared with controls.
Intervention effect Ulva spp. extracts did not significantly change tomato seedling growth compared with the control.
Intervention effect Different dosages of the extracts of two Ulva species were not lethal to tomato seedlings.

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

N harvest index and apparent N recovery efficiency did not significantly change between 105 and 195 kg / ha.

Taxon: wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment: 105 kg / ha to 195 kg / hae0
Outcome: N harvest index and apparent N recovery efficiencye0
Direction: no significantly changese0

Verbatim

e0
“N harvest index and apparent N recovery efficiency have no significantly changes from 105 kg / ha to 195 kg / ha”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1082

t0
“mechanical sowing wheat in rice-wheat cropping system”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–114

Title

Effect of N rates on growth,development and N utilization of mechanical sowing wheat in rice-wheat cropping system in Sichuan Basin

LI Chao-s Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer 2014

Other claims from this paper (4)

Association Higher N rate increased tillering ability, effective spikes, spikelets and grains per spike.
Intervention effect Yield was highest at 150 kg / ha N across both seasons and all sites.
Association Above 150 kg / ha, yield gains diminished or reversed.
Recommendation The authors recommended 150 kg / ha for higher yield and maximum profit.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grazing did not significantly affect average winter wheat grain yield.

Taxon: winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment: grazinge3
Outcome: grain yielde3
Direction: not significantly affectede3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“grazing experiments with winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) were conducted near Canberra, Australia”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–337

e3
“Average grain yield (381 g/m2) was not significantly affected by grazing”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–943

Title

Recovery dynamics of rainfed winter wheat after livestock grazing 1. Growth rates, grain yields, soil water use and water-use efficiency

Matthew T. Harrison; John R. Evans; Hugh Dove; et al. Crop and Pasture Science 2011. doi:10.1071/cp11234

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effect LS and HS grazing did not affect winter wheat aboveground net primary production in 2007.
Intervention effect LL grazing in 2007 and HS grazing in 2008 reduced winter wheat aboveground net primary production by 20%.
Intervention effect Grazing increased the proportion of water lost through soil evaporation in winter wheat.
Intervention effect Grazing decreased transpiration of winter wheat.
Intervention effect Grazing reduced shoot dry matter production per unit evapotranspiration by up to 22% in winter wheat.
Intervention effect Grazing did not affect grain yield per unit evapotranspiration of winter wheat.
Intervention effect Winter wheat biomass production was greater with shorter than with longer grazing durations, irrespective of grazing intensity.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

There were no significant differences among treatments in number of leaves and number of tillers.

Taxon: Scallion Green Oniont0
Outcome: number of leaves, number of tillerse0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0
“Scallion Green Onion”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–62

e0
“Non-significant differences among treatments were noted in the number of leaves, number of tillers, diameter of bulb and percent recovery”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1037

Title

Growth and Yield Performance of “Sakurab” Scallion Green Onion (Allium Fistulusom L.) Under Different Rates of Chicken Dung and Sources of Soil Amendment

Rashdi Macalangcom Casim IAR Journal of Agriculture Research and Life Sciences 2021. doi:10.47310/iarjals.2021.v02i01.009

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Different rates of chicken dung produced significant differences in average plant height, initial weight and final weight of scallion green onion.
Intervention effect There were no significant differences among treatments in bulb diameter and percent recovery.
Intervention effect Rice hull plus 5 tons/ha chicken dung (A2B1) gave the highest return of investment, 263.63%.
Intervention effect Rice hull plus 5 tons/ha chicken dung (A2B1) also had the highest net income.
Intervention effect The authors conclude that soil amendment sources and chicken dung rates greatly affect growth and yield performance of scallion green onion.
Recommendation The authors recommend that local farmers use 10 tons/ha of rice hull as soil amendment and incorporate 5 tons/ha of chicken dung.

“rates of recovery growth”

Claim types

Direction of the findings

Over time

Claim type

Research area

Polarity

Statistics