By organism › Green plants › Sphagnaceae › Sphagnum magellanicum

Method / resourceobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Genomes of Sphagnum magellanicum provided insights into carbon fixation, adaptation and lineage traits.

Taxon: Sphagnum magellanicumSphagnum magellanicume0
Outcome: new insights into carbon fixation mechanisms, ecological adaptations, and lineage-specific evolutionary traitse0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Verbatim

e0
“Notably, the genomes of Sphagnum fallax, Sphagnum magellanicum, the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha and hornworts from Athoceros genus have provided new insights into carbon fixation mechanisms, ecological adaptations, and lineage-specific evolutionary traits.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–823

Title

The Importance of the Physcomitrium patens Genome in the Evolutionary Genomics of Terrestrial Plants

Anderson Franco da Cruz Lima; Wellington Bruno dos Santos Alves; Letícia Fernanda Presotti Matos; et al. Plants 2026. doi:10.3390/plants15081261

Other claims from this paper (7)

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

35% shading increased shoot elongation against no shading.

Taxon: Sphagnum magellanicumSphagnum magellanicumt0
Treatment: 35%e0
Outcome: shoot elongatione0
Direction: increasede0
Comparator: the control (no shading)e0

Verbatim

e0
“The 35% and 70% shading increased shoot elongation compared with the control (no shading)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–830

t0
“Sphagnum magellanicum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–43

Title

Shading as a tool for Sphagnum magellanicum regeneration: scalable implications for peatland restoration in southern South America

Janice Zúñiga; Sebastián A. Reyes; Cristian Atala; et al. Botany 2025. doi:10.1139/cjb-2025-0090

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect 70% shading increased shoot elongation against no shading.
Intervention effect 80% shading did not promote regeneration.
Intervention effect 80% shading produced significantly longer shoots than unshaded moss.
Intervention effect All shaded treatments increased chlorophyll a and b concentrations.
Intervention effect Shading did not affect carotenoid or sphagnorubin levels.
Recommendation The authors recommend 35%–70% Raschel shading for ex situ production and peatland restoration.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

70% shading increased shoot elongation against no shading.

Taxon: Sphagnum magellanicumSphagnum magellanicumt0
Treatment: 70% shadinge0
Outcome: shoot elongatione0
Direction: increasede0
Comparator: the control (no shading)e0

Verbatim

e0
“The 35% and 70% shading increased shoot elongation compared with the control (no shading)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–830

t0
“Sphagnum magellanicum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–43

Title

Shading as a tool for Sphagnum magellanicum regeneration: scalable implications for peatland restoration in southern South America

Janice Zúñiga; Sebastián A. Reyes; Cristian Atala; et al. Botany 2025. doi:10.1139/cjb-2025-0090

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect 35% shading increased shoot elongation against no shading.
Intervention effect 80% shading did not promote regeneration.
Intervention effect 80% shading produced significantly longer shoots than unshaded moss.
Intervention effect All shaded treatments increased chlorophyll a and b concentrations.
Intervention effect Shading did not affect carotenoid or sphagnorubin levels.
Recommendation The authors recommend 35%–70% Raschel shading for ex situ production and peatland restoration.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

80% shading did not promote regeneration.

Taxon: Sphagnum magellanicumSphagnum magellanicumt0
Treatment: 80% shadinge0
Outcome: regeneratione0
Direction: did not promotee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“the 80% shading did not promote regeneration”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–884

t0
“Sphagnum magellanicum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–43

Title

Shading as a tool for Sphagnum magellanicum regeneration: scalable implications for peatland restoration in southern South America

Janice Zúñiga; Sebastián A. Reyes; Cristian Atala; et al. Botany 2025. doi:10.1139/cjb-2025-0090

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect 35% shading increased shoot elongation against no shading.
Intervention effect 70% shading increased shoot elongation against no shading.
Intervention effect 80% shading produced significantly longer shoots than unshaded moss.
Intervention effect All shaded treatments increased chlorophyll a and b concentrations.
Intervention effect Shading did not affect carotenoid or sphagnorubin levels.
Recommendation The authors recommend 35%–70% Raschel shading for ex situ production and peatland restoration.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

80% shading produced significantly longer shoots than unshaded moss.

Taxon: Sphagnum magellanicumSphagnum magellanicumt0
Treatment: 80% shadinge0
Outcome: shootse0
Direction: longere0
Comparator: unshaded mosse0

Verbatim

e0
“the 80% shading did not promote regeneration but produced shoots significantly longer than those of unshaded moss”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 840–953

t0
“Sphagnum magellanicum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–43

Title

Shading as a tool for Sphagnum magellanicum regeneration: scalable implications for peatland restoration in southern South America

Janice Zúñiga; Sebastián A. Reyes; Cristian Atala; et al. Botany 2025. doi:10.1139/cjb-2025-0090

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect 35% shading increased shoot elongation against no shading.
Intervention effect 70% shading increased shoot elongation against no shading.
Intervention effect 80% shading did not promote regeneration.
Intervention effect All shaded treatments increased chlorophyll a and b concentrations.
Intervention effect Shading did not affect carotenoid or sphagnorubin levels.
Recommendation The authors recommend 35%–70% Raschel shading for ex situ production and peatland restoration.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All shaded treatments increased chlorophyll a and b concentrations.

Taxon: Sphagnum magellanicumSphagnum magellanicumt0
Treatment: All shaded treatmentse0
Outcome: chlorophyll a and b concentrationse0
Direction: highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“All shaded treatments had higher chlorophyll a and b concentrations”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1022

t0
“Sphagnum magellanicum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–43

Title

Shading as a tool for Sphagnum magellanicum regeneration: scalable implications for peatland restoration in southern South America

Janice Zúñiga; Sebastián A. Reyes; Cristian Atala; et al. Botany 2025. doi:10.1139/cjb-2025-0090

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect 35% shading increased shoot elongation against no shading.
Intervention effect 70% shading increased shoot elongation against no shading.
Intervention effect 80% shading did not promote regeneration.
Intervention effect 80% shading produced significantly longer shoots than unshaded moss.
Intervention effect Shading did not affect carotenoid or sphagnorubin levels.
Recommendation The authors recommend 35%–70% Raschel shading for ex situ production and peatland restoration.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading did not affect carotenoid or sphagnorubin levels.

Taxon: Sphagnum magellanicumSphagnum magellanicumt0
Treatment: All shaded treatmentse0
Outcome: carotenoid and sphagnorubin levelse0
Direction: unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“All shaded treatments had higher chlorophyll a and b concentrations, while carotenoid and sphagnorubin levels were unaffected”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 955–1080

t0
“Sphagnum magellanicum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–43

Title

Shading as a tool for Sphagnum magellanicum regeneration: scalable implications for peatland restoration in southern South America

Janice Zúñiga; Sebastián A. Reyes; Cristian Atala; et al. Botany 2025. doi:10.1139/cjb-2025-0090

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect 35% shading increased shoot elongation against no shading.
Intervention effect 70% shading increased shoot elongation against no shading.
Intervention effect 80% shading did not promote regeneration.
Intervention effect 80% shading produced significantly longer shoots than unshaded moss.
Intervention effect All shaded treatments increased chlorophyll a and b concentrations.
Recommendation The authors recommend 35%–70% Raschel shading for ex situ production and peatland restoration.

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 35%–70% Raschel shading for ex situ production and peatland restoration.

Taxon: Sphagnum magellanicumSphagnum magellanicumt0
Treatment: 35%–70% Raschel shadinge0
Outcome: ex situ production and field restoration of peatlandse0
Setting: Southern South Americae0

Verbatim

e0
“applying 35%–70% Raschel shading could serve as a practical method for ex situ production and field restoration of peatlands in Southern South America”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1356

t0
“Sphagnum magellanicum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–43

Title

Shading as a tool for Sphagnum magellanicum regeneration: scalable implications for peatland restoration in southern South America

Janice Zúñiga; Sebastián A. Reyes; Cristian Atala; et al. Botany 2025. doi:10.1139/cjb-2025-0090

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect 35% shading increased shoot elongation against no shading.
Intervention effect 70% shading increased shoot elongation against no shading.
Intervention effect 80% shading did not promote regeneration.
Intervention effect 80% shading produced significantly longer shoots than unshaded moss.
Intervention effect All shaded treatments increased chlorophyll a and b concentrations.
Intervention effect Shading did not affect carotenoid or sphagnorubin levels.

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. magellanicum decomposed the slowest among the Sphagnum species.

Taxon: S. magellanicumSphagnum magellanicume0
Outcome: decompositione0
Direction: sloweste0

Verbatim

e0
“Sphagnum biomass transplants, interspecific differences in decomposition overruled the effects of both the origin of the material and the environment of the decomposition site, with S. magellanicum decomposing the slowest.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–953

Title

Decomposition patterns, nutrient availability, species identities and vegetation changes in central-European summit bogs

Jiroušek, Martin; Tůma, Ivan; Záhora, Jaroslav; et al. Työväentutkimus Vuosikirja 2024. doi:10.60910/yukk-3z5j

Other claims from this paper (3)

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sphagnum magellanicum height increment depended on season and water table level.

Taxon: Sphagnum magellanicumSphagnum magellanicume1
Outcome: height incremente0
Setting: WTLe0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“Both Sphagnum species showed season- and WTL-dependent height increment and released phenolics”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–794

e1
“Sphagnum magellanicum Bridel, 1798”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–679

Title

Monthly dynamics of phenolic release and allelopathic effect in hollow and hummock Sphagnum

Chao Liu; Yong-Da Chen; Azim Mallik; et al. Botany 2023. doi:10.1139/cjb-2023-0058

Other claims from this paper (9)

Sphagnum magellanicum 148 claims

148 claims