Sphagnaceae 4,625 claims

Claim · model-written summary

Sphagnum communities had gross primary production ranging from 0 to –2384.7 mg CO2/m2 h in forest-mire habitats.

Taxon

SphagnumSphagnumt0

Outcome

Gross primary production (GPP)e2

Value

0 to –2384.7 mg CO2/m2 he2

Setting

forest-mire habitats (Arkhangelsk region)e1

Verbatim

t0

“CO2-Gas Exchange of Sphagnum Mosses”

e1

“The species-specificity of carbon exchange responses of Sphagnum communities to hydrothermal factors was studied in forest-mire habitats (Arkhangelsk region)”

e2

“Gross primary production (GPP) ranged from 0 to –2384.7 mg CO2/m2 h, and ecosystem respiration (ER) ranged from 45.2 to 1411.5 mg CO2/m2 h”

Claim · model-written summary

Sphagnum communities had ecosystem respiration ranging from 45.2 to 1411.5 mg CO2/m2 h in forest-mire habitats.

Taxon

SphagnumSphagnumt0

Outcome

ecosystem respiration (ER)e2

Value

45.2 to 1411.5 mg CO2/m2 he2

Setting

forest-mire habitats (Arkhangelsk region)e1

Verbatim

t0

“CO2-Gas Exchange of Sphagnum Mosses”

e1

“The species-specificity of carbon exchange responses of Sphagnum communities to hydrothermal factors was studied in forest-mire habitats (Arkhangelsk region)”

e2

“ecosystem respiration (ER) ranged from 45.2 to 1411.5 mg CO2/m2 h”

Claim · model-written summary

For S. fuscum, GPP is regulated by the interaction of temperature regime and air humidity.

Taxon

S. fuscumSphagnum fuscume3

Treatment

the interaction of temperature regime and air humiditye3

Outcome

GPPe3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e3

“The main factors regulating GPP were: for S. fuscum, the interaction of temperature regime and air humidity”

Claim · model-written summary

For S. lindbergii, GPP is regulated by the combined effect of habitat water content and temperature.

Taxon

S. lindbergiiSphagnum lindbergiie3

Treatment

the combined effect of habitat water content and temperaturee3

Outcome

GPPe2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e2

“Gross primary production (GPP) ranged from 0 to –2384.7 mg CO2/m2 h”

e3

“for S. lindbergii, the combined effect of habitat water content and temperature”

Claim · model-written summary

For S. divinum, GPP is regulated by air humidity and water content of the peat deposit.

Taxon

S. divinumSphagnum divinume3

Treatment

air humidity and water content of the peat deposite3

Outcome

GPPe2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e2

“Gross primary production (GPP) ranged from 0 to –2384.7 mg CO2/m2 h”

e3

“for S. divinum and S. squarrosum, air humidity and water content of the peat deposit”

Claim · model-written summary

For S. squarrosum, GPP is regulated by air humidity and water content of the peat deposit.

Taxon

S. squarrosumSphagnum squarrosume3

Treatment

air humidity and water content of the peat deposite3

Outcome

GPPe2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e2

“Gross primary production (GPP) ranged from 0 to –2384.7 mg CO2/m2 h”

e3

“for S. divinum and S. squarrosum, air humidity and water content of the peat deposit”

Claim · model-written summary

Ecosystem respiration regulation in Sphagnum is species specific and controlled by temperature or its interaction with other factors.

Taxon

SphagnumSphagnumt0

Treatment

temperaturee4

Outcome

ER regulatione4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“CO2-Gas Exchange of Sphagnum Mosses”

e4

“The ER regulation was also species specific and controlled by temperature or its interaction with other factors”

Claim · model-written summary

Sphagnum decomposition was higher in the R. auriculatum–S. palustre peatland than in the S. palustre-dominated peatland.

Taxon

Sphagnum palustreSphagnum palustree0

Treatment

R. auriculatum (Sapling)e0

Interactor

R. auriculatumRhododendron auriculatume0other

Outcome

Decompositione0

Direction

highere0

Comparator

Sphagnum palustre L.-dominated peatlande0

Verbatim

e0

“This study compared Sphagnum decomposition in a Sphagnum palustre L.-dominated peatland and an R. auriculatum (Sapling)–S. palustre peatland by examining the microscopic structure of S. palustre and microbial community composition. Decomposition was higher in the R. auriculatum–S. palustre peatland”

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial metabolic types such as aerobic chemoheterotrophy and chemoheterotrophy had higher relative abundances in the R. auriculatum peatland.

Taxon

Sphagnum palustreSphagnum palustree0

Interactor

bacterial metabolic typese1other

Outcome

relative abundancese1

Direction

highere1

Verbatim

e0

“This study compared Sphagnum decomposition in a Sphagnum palustre L.-dominated peatland and an R. auriculatum (Sapling)–S. palustre peatland by examining the microscopic structure of S. palustre and microbial community composition. Decomposition was higher in the R. auriculatum–S. palustre peatland”

e1

“bacterial metabolic types such as aerobic chemoheterotrophy and chemoheterotrophy had higher relative abundances, as did fungal trophic modes, including those with combined ectomycorrhizal, ericoid mycorrhizal, and saprotrophic functions”

Claim · model-written summary

Fungal trophic modes, including combined ectomycorrhizal, ericoid mycorrhizal and saprotrophic functions, also had higher relative abundances in the R. auriculatum peatland.

Taxon

Sphagnum palustreSphagnum palustree0

Interactor

fungal trophic modese1other

Outcome

relative abundancese1

Direction

highere1

Verbatim

e0

“This study compared Sphagnum decomposition in a Sphagnum palustre L.-dominated peatland and an R. auriculatum (Sapling)–S. palustre peatland by examining the microscopic structure of S. palustre and microbial community composition. Decomposition was higher in the R. auriculatum–S. palustre peatland”

e1

“bacterial metabolic types such as aerobic chemoheterotrophy and chemoheterotrophy had higher relative abundances, as did fungal trophic modes, including those with combined ectomycorrhizal, ericoid mycorrhizal, and saprotrophic functions”