By organism › Green plants › Sphagnaceae › Sphagnum majus

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sphagnum majus had medium annual growth (42 mm) in low-flow watered bogs.

Taxon: S. majusSphagnum majuse2
Outcome: annual growthe0
Direction: medium growthse2
Value: 42 mme2
Setting: low-flow watered bogs, hollows, and on carpetse2

Verbatim

e0
“The paper presents long-term results (from 10 to 38 years) of studies of the dynamics of annual growth of 11 widespread hygro- and hydrophilic species of sphagnum mosses”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–573

e2
“medium growths of S. fallax (65 mm), S. subsecundum (57 mm), S. majus (42 mm), S. balticum (36 mm), and S. warnstorfii (28 mm) are found in low-flow watered bogs, hollows, and on carpets”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–1005

Title

Results of Long-Term Studies of Annual Growth of Mosses of the Genus Sphagnum L. in the Central Taiga of Karelia

S. I. Grabovik; L. V. Kantserova; S. R. Znamenskiy Russian Journal of Ecology 2024. doi:10.1134/s1067413624602094

Other claims from this paper (16)

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The precipitation dependence of annual growth of S. divinum, S. fuscum and S. majus is weak.

Taxon: S. divinum, S. fuscum, and S. majusSphagnum fuscumSphagnum majusSphagnum divinume7
Treatment: precipitation during the growing seasone7
Outcome: annual growthe7
Qualifier: weake7

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e7
“A significant dependence of annual growth on precipitation during the growing season was shown for species S. obtusum, S. papillosum, S. centrale, S. fallax, and S. subsecundum, while the significance was weak for S. divinum, S. fuscum, and S. majus”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1744–1993

Title

Results of Long-Term Studies of Annual Growth of Mosses of the Genus Sphagnum L. in the Central Taiga of Karelia

S. I. Grabovik; L. V. Kantserova; S. R. Znamenskiy Russian Journal of Ecology 2024. doi:10.1134/s1067413624602094

Other claims from this paper (16)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S. majus had medium growth of 42 mm.

Taxon: S. majusSphagnum majuse0
Outcome: medium growthse0
Value: 42 mme0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0
“medium growths of S. fallax (65 mm), S. subsecundum (57 mm), S. majus (42 mm), S. balticum (36 mm), and S. warnstorfii (28 mm)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 807–933

Title

Results of long-term studies of the annual growth of mosses of the genus Sphagnum L. In the central taiga of Karelia

S. I. Grabovik; L. V. Kantserova; S. R. Znamenskiy Экология 2024. doi:10.31857/s0367059724040021

Other claims from this paper (15)

Observation Sphagnum riparium showed one of the largest annual growth increases, 140 mm.
Observation S. obtusum showed one of the largest annual growth increases, 93 mm.
Observation S. fallax had medium growth of 65 mm.
Observation S. subsecundum had medium growth of 57 mm.
Observation S. balticum had medium growth of 36 mm.
Observation S. warnstorfii had medium growth of 28 mm.
Observation S. divinum had low growth of 17 mm.
Observation S. centrale had low growth of 15 mm.
Observation S. papillosum had low growth of 12 mm.
Observation S. fuscum had low growth of 8 mm.
Association Growing-season temperature had no significant association with Sphagnum annual growth overall.
Association S. fuscum, S. obtusum, and S. warnstorfii had negative associations with temperature in individual months.
Association Growing-season precipitation was the main factor associated with Sphagnum annual growth.
Association S. obtusum, S. papillosum, S. centrale, S. fallax, and S. subsecundum showed significant dependence of growth on growing-season precipitation.
Association S. divinum, S. fuscum, and S. majus showed weak significance of growth dependence on precipitation.

Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Sphagnum majus was not predicted to change its future distribution when blanket bog is held at its current level.

Taxon: Sphagnum majusSphagnum majuse2
Treatment: blanket bog is held constant at the current levele2
Outcome: future distributione2
Direction: not predicted to changee2

Verbatim

t0
“Modelling the future distribution of rare bryophytes in Scotland”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–64

e2
“For example, Sphagnum majus, the species with the highest affinity with blanket bog in our study, was not predicted to change its future distribution when blanket bog is held constant at the current level, but was predicted to lose up to 60% of its current suitable area when the projected loss of blanket bog is included”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1709

Title

Modelling the future distribution of rare bryophytes in Scotland: the importance of the inclusion of habitat loss

Anna Ferretto; Peter Smith; David R. Genney; et al. Plant Ecology & Diversity 2023. doi:10.1080/17550874.2023.2274839

Other claims from this paper (3)

Associationobservedoriginal resultprojected

Claim · model-written summary

Sphagnum majus was predicted to lose up to 60% of its current suitable area when the projected loss of blanket bog is included.

Taxon: Sphagnum majusSphagnum majuse2
Treatment: projected loss of blanket bog is includede2
Outcome: current suitable areae2
Direction: losee2
Value: up to 60%e2

Verbatim

t0
“Modelling the future distribution of rare bryophytes in Scotland”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–64

e2
“For example, Sphagnum majus, the species with the highest affinity with blanket bog in our study, was not predicted to change its future distribution when blanket bog is held constant at the current level, but was predicted to lose up to 60% of its current suitable area when the projected loss of blanket bog is included”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1388–1709

Title

Modelling the future distribution of rare bryophytes in Scotland: the importance of the inclusion of habitat loss

Anna Ferretto; Peter Smith; David R. Genney; et al. Plant Ecology & Diversity 2023. doi:10.1080/17550874.2023.2274839

Other claims from this paper (3)

Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Field collections of the two Sphagnum majus subspecies can be statistically differentiated morphologically, with substantial overlap.

Taxon: Sphagnum majusSphagnum majuse0
Material: field collectionse1
Outcome: statistically differentiated morphologicallye1
Qualifier: substantial overlape1

Verbatim

e0
“The allopolyploid species, Sphagnum majus, comprises one such problematic complex”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–258

e1
“Although field collections of the two species can be statistically differentiated morphologically, there is substantial overlap”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 521–648

Title

Morphological-molecular incongruence in Sphagnum majus ssp. majus and ssp. norvegicum

Marta Nieto-Lugilde; Sean Robinson; Blanka Aguero; et al. The Bryologist 2022. doi:10.1639/0007-2745-125.2.294

Other claims from this paper (4)

Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genome-scale molecular data show no differentiation between S. majus ssp. majus and ssp. norvegicum.

Taxon: S. majusSphagnum majuse2
Outcome: any differentiatione2

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e2
“Genome-scale molecular data do not suggest any differentiation between S. majus ssp. majus and ssp. norvegicum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–760

Title

Morphological-molecular incongruence in Sphagnum majus ssp. majus and ssp. norvegicum

Marta Nieto-Lugilde; Sean Robinson; Blanka Aguero; et al. The Bryologist 2022. doi:10.1639/0007-2745-125.2.294

Other claims from this paper (4)

Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plastid genome sequence data support S. annulatum as the paternal parent and S. cuspidatum as the maternal parent of allopolyploid S. majus.

Taxon: Sphagnum majusSphagnum majuse0
Outcome: paternal parente1
Qualifier: plastid genomee1

Verbatim

e0
“The allopolyploid species, Sphagnum majus, comprises one such problematic complex”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–258

e1
“Sequence data from the plastid genome were employed to infer parentage of allopolyploid S. majus. Our results support the hypothesis that S. annulatum is the paternal parent and S. cuspidatum is the maternal parent”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–1041

Title

Morphological-molecular incongruence in Sphagnum majus ssp. majus and ssp. norvegicum

Marta Nieto-Lugilde; Sean Robinson; Blanka Aguero; et al. The Bryologist 2022. doi:10.1639/0007-2745-125.2.294

Other claims from this paper (4)

Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The morphological differences between the two subspecies are interpreted as either plastic responses to habitat heterogeneity or segregating genetic variation within a single taxon.

Taxon: Sphagnum majusSphagnum majuse0
Outcome: morphological differencese3
Qualifier: plastic responses to habitat heterogeneity or segregating genetic variation within a single taxone3

Verbatim

e0
“The allopolyploid species, Sphagnum majus, comprises one such problematic complex”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–258

e3
“We conclude that the morphological differences between them are either plastic responses to habitat heterogeneity or segregating genetic variation within a single taxon”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1211

Title

Morphological-molecular incongruence in Sphagnum majus ssp. majus and ssp. norvegicum

Marta Nieto-Lugilde; Sean Robinson; Blanka Aguero; et al. The Bryologist 2022. doi:10.1639/0007-2745-125.2.294

Other claims from this paper (4)

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Molecular data do not support formal taxonomic recognition of two Sphagnum majus taxa.

Taxon: Sphagnum majusSphagnum majuse0
Outcome: Formal taxonomic recognition of two taxae4

Verbatim

e0
“The allopolyploid species, Sphagnum majus, comprises one such problematic complex”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–258

e4
“Formal taxonomic recognition of two taxa is not supported by our molecular data”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1292

Title

Morphological-molecular incongruence in Sphagnum majus ssp. majus and ssp. norvegicum

Marta Nieto-Lugilde; Sean Robinson; Blanka Aguero; et al. The Bryologist 2022. doi:10.1639/0007-2745-125.2.294

Other claims from this paper (4)

Sphagnum majus 22 claims

22 claims