Eustoma russellianum 937 claims

species · family Gentianaceae · green plant · NCBI Taxonomy ↗

Common name: prairie gentian — Also written in claims: Eustoma grandiflorum · Lisianthus · Eustoma grandiflorum Shinn · E. grandiflorum · E. grandiflorum Shinners · prairie gentian — NCBI synonyms: Bilamista grandiflora · Eustoma exaltatum subsp. russellianum · Eustoma grandiflorum · Eustoma grandiflorum (Raf.) Shinners, 1957 · Lisianthius russellianus

13 spellings

Questions studied on this organism25 questions41 papers

Eustoma russellianumSam Kieschnick · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

937 claims

Open in search (filters, sorting) →

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three independent lines had deletions or insertions in all EgCCD8 alleles.

Taxon: Eustoma grandiflorumEustoma russellianumt0
Gene: EgCCD8e0
Outcome: deletions or insertions in all EgCCD8 allelese0
Value: Three independent linese0

Verbatim

e0
“Three independent lines carried deletions or insertions in all EgCCD8 alleles, indicating high editing efficiency.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–784

t0
“Eustoma grandiflorum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–77

Title

Engineering plant architecture in the ornamental species Eustoma grandiflorum by knockout of strigolactone biosynthesis

Kana Yamaguchi; Eri Tomizawa; Noriko Kanematsu; et al. Plant Cell Reports 2026. doi:10.1007/s00299-026-03867-w

Other claims from this paper (6)

Intervention effect Two edited lines showed increased branching.
Observation Two edited lines showed pronounced dwarfism.
Intervention effect Height of T 1 null segregants in one line was 47% of wild type.
Intervention effect Branch number increased 5.0-fold over wild type.
Intervention effect Flower bud formation increased 1.7-fold alongside branching.
Observation The authors conclude CCD8 mutation changes architecture without compromising other ornamental traits.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two edited lines showed increased branching.

Taxon: Eustoma grandiflorumEustoma russellianumt0
Treatment: Two linese0
Outcome: branchinge0
Direction: increasede0
Value: Two linese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Two lines exhibited increased branching and pronounced dwarfism.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–849

t0
“Eustoma grandiflorum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–77

Title

Engineering plant architecture in the ornamental species Eustoma grandiflorum by knockout of strigolactone biosynthesis

Kana Yamaguchi; Eri Tomizawa; Noriko Kanematsu; et al. Plant Cell Reports 2026. doi:10.1007/s00299-026-03867-w

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observation Three independent lines had deletions or insertions in all EgCCD8 alleles.
Observation Two edited lines showed pronounced dwarfism.
Intervention effect Height of T 1 null segregants in one line was 47% of wild type.
Intervention effect Branch number increased 5.0-fold over wild type.
Intervention effect Flower bud formation increased 1.7-fold alongside branching.
Observation The authors conclude CCD8 mutation changes architecture without compromising other ornamental traits.

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two edited lines showed pronounced dwarfism.

Taxon: Eustoma grandiflorumEustoma russellianumt0
Outcome: pronounced dwarfisme0
Value: Two linese0

Verbatim

e0
“Two lines exhibited increased branching and pronounced dwarfism.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–849

t0
“Eustoma grandiflorum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–77

Title

Engineering plant architecture in the ornamental species Eustoma grandiflorum by knockout of strigolactone biosynthesis

Kana Yamaguchi; Eri Tomizawa; Noriko Kanematsu; et al. Plant Cell Reports 2026. doi:10.1007/s00299-026-03867-w

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observation Three independent lines had deletions or insertions in all EgCCD8 alleles.
Intervention effect Two edited lines showed increased branching.
Intervention effect Height of T 1 null segregants in one line was 47% of wild type.
Intervention effect Branch number increased 5.0-fold over wild type.
Intervention effect Flower bud formation increased 1.7-fold alongside branching.
Observation The authors conclude CCD8 mutation changes architecture without compromising other ornamental traits.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Height of T 1 null segregants in one line was 47% of wild type.

Taxon: Eustoma grandiflorumEustoma russellianumt0
Material: T 1 null segregantse0
Treatment: T 1 null segregantse0
Outcome: plant heighte0
Direction: reducede0
Value: 47%e0
Comparator: wild-type (WT)e0

Verbatim

e0
“In one of these lines, plant height in T 1 null segregants was reduced to 47% of wild-type (WT) levels.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 850–953

t0
“Eustoma grandiflorum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–77

Title

Engineering plant architecture in the ornamental species Eustoma grandiflorum by knockout of strigolactone biosynthesis

Kana Yamaguchi; Eri Tomizawa; Noriko Kanematsu; et al. Plant Cell Reports 2026. doi:10.1007/s00299-026-03867-w

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observation Three independent lines had deletions or insertions in all EgCCD8 alleles.
Intervention effect Two edited lines showed increased branching.
Observation Two edited lines showed pronounced dwarfism.
Intervention effect Branch number increased 5.0-fold over wild type.
Intervention effect Flower bud formation increased 1.7-fold alongside branching.
Observation The authors conclude CCD8 mutation changes architecture without compromising other ornamental traits.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Branch number increased 5.0-fold over wild type.

Taxon: Eustoma grandiflorumEustoma russellianumt0
Outcome: Branch numbere0
Direction: increasede0
Value: 5.0-folde0
Comparator: WTe0

Not reportedTreatment

Verbatim

e0
“Branch number increased 5.0-fold compared with the WT”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1007

t0
“Eustoma grandiflorum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–77

Title

Engineering plant architecture in the ornamental species Eustoma grandiflorum by knockout of strigolactone biosynthesis

Kana Yamaguchi; Eri Tomizawa; Noriko Kanematsu; et al. Plant Cell Reports 2026. doi:10.1007/s00299-026-03867-w

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observation Three independent lines had deletions or insertions in all EgCCD8 alleles.
Intervention effect Two edited lines showed increased branching.
Observation Two edited lines showed pronounced dwarfism.
Intervention effect Height of T 1 null segregants in one line was 47% of wild type.
Intervention effect Flower bud formation increased 1.7-fold alongside branching.
Observation The authors conclude CCD8 mutation changes architecture without compromising other ornamental traits.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower bud formation increased 1.7-fold alongside branching.

Taxon: Eustoma grandiflorumEustoma russellianumt0
Outcome: flower bud formatione0
Direction: increasede0
Value: 1.7-folde0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0
“flower bud formation increased 1.7-fold alongside enhanced branching.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1013–1082

t0
“Eustoma grandiflorum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–77

Title

Engineering plant architecture in the ornamental species Eustoma grandiflorum by knockout of strigolactone biosynthesis

Kana Yamaguchi; Eri Tomizawa; Noriko Kanematsu; et al. Plant Cell Reports 2026. doi:10.1007/s00299-026-03867-w

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observation Three independent lines had deletions or insertions in all EgCCD8 alleles.
Intervention effect Two edited lines showed increased branching.
Observation Two edited lines showed pronounced dwarfism.
Intervention effect Height of T 1 null segregants in one line was 47% of wild type.
Intervention effect Branch number increased 5.0-fold over wild type.
Observation The authors conclude CCD8 mutation changes architecture without compromising other ornamental traits.

Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude CCD8 mutation changes architecture without compromising other ornamental traits.

Taxon: Eustoma grandiflorumEustoma russellianumt0
Gene: CCD8e0
Outcome: without compromising other ornamental traitse0

Verbatim

e0
“targeted mutation of CCD8 through genome editing induces dwarfism and enhanced branching without compromising other ornamental traits.”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1253

t0
“Eustoma grandiflorum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–77

Title

Engineering plant architecture in the ornamental species Eustoma grandiflorum by knockout of strigolactone biosynthesis

Kana Yamaguchi; Eri Tomizawa; Noriko Kanematsu; et al. Plant Cell Reports 2026. doi:10.1007/s00299-026-03867-w

Other claims from this paper (6)

Observation Three independent lines had deletions or insertions in all EgCCD8 alleles.
Intervention effect Two edited lines showed increased branching.
Observation Two edited lines showed pronounced dwarfism.
Intervention effect Height of T 1 null segregants in one line was 47% of wild type.
Intervention effect Branch number increased 5.0-fold over wild type.
Intervention effect Flower bud formation increased 1.7-fold alongside branching.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments generally increased plant height and leaf number.

Taxon: Eustoma russellianumEustoma russellianumt0
Treatment: treatmentse0
Outcome: Plant height and leaf numbere0
Direction: increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“Plant height and leaf number generally increased with treatments”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–740

t0
“Eustoma russellianum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–116

Title

Biostimulation with Se, I, Co, Si and Saccharomyces cerevisiae improves growth and flowering of Eustoma russellianum

Carlos A. GABRIEL-ZUNUN; José A. GONZÁLEZ-FUENTES; Adalberto BENAVIDES-MENDOZA; et al. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 2026. doi:10.15835/nbha54115091

Other claims from this paper (2)

Intervention effect All treatments increased petal number.
Intervention effect Biostimulant application decreased potassium content.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All treatments increased petal number.

Taxon: Eustoma russellianumEustoma russellianumt0
Treatment: All treatmentse0
Outcome: petal numbere0
Direction: increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“All treatments increased petal number”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1219

t0
“Eustoma russellianum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–116

Title

Biostimulation with Se, I, Co, Si and Saccharomyces cerevisiae improves growth and flowering of Eustoma russellianum

Carlos A. GABRIEL-ZUNUN; José A. GONZÁLEZ-FUENTES; Adalberto BENAVIDES-MENDOZA; et al. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 2026. doi:10.15835/nbha54115091

Other claims from this paper (2)

Intervention effect Treatments generally increased plant height and leaf number.
Intervention effect Biostimulant application decreased potassium content.

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biostimulant application decreased potassium content.

Taxon: Eustoma russellianumEustoma russellianumt0
Treatment: biostimulant applicatione0
Outcome: potassium (K)e0
Direction: decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0
“potassium (K) decreased with biostimulant application”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1497

t0
“Eustoma russellianum”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–116

Title

Biostimulation with Se, I, Co, Si and Saccharomyces cerevisiae improves growth and flowering of Eustoma russellianum

Carlos A. GABRIEL-ZUNUN; José A. GONZÁLEZ-FUENTES; Adalberto BENAVIDES-MENDOZA; et al. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 2026. doi:10.15835/nbha54115091

Other claims from this paper (2)

Intervention effect Treatments generally increased plant height and leaf number.
Intervention effect All treatments increased petal number.